Commentaire sur Rois 2 5:20
וַיֹּ֣אמֶר גֵּיחֲזִ֗י נַעַר֮ אֱלִישָׁ֣ע אִישׁ־הָאֱלֹהִים֒ הִנֵּ֣ה ׀ חָשַׂ֣ךְ אֲדֹנִ֗י אֶֽת־נַעֲמָ֤ן הָֽאֲרַמִּי֙ הַזֶּ֔ה מִקַּ֥חַת מִיָּד֖וֹ אֵ֣ת אֲשֶׁר־הֵבִ֑יא חַי־יְהוָה֙ כִּֽי־אִם־רַ֣צְתִּי אַחֲרָ֔יו וְלָקַחְתִּ֥י מֵאִתּ֖וֹ מְאֽוּמָה׃
Ghéhazi, serviteur d’Élisée, l’homme de Dieu, s’était dit: "Mon maître a refusé d’accepter de la main de ce Syrien Naaman ce qu’il avait apporté. Vive Dieu! Je vais courir après lui, et j’en aurai quelque chose."
From David to Destruction
What Goes Wrong?
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Rashi on II Kings
Something. The ‘א’ is missing,14The word “מְאוּמָה” is written “מוּמָה,” without the ‘א.’ מוּם means a flaw. As a result of this taking, he was stricken with Na’amon’s flaw, that of tzora’as. because this taking was [responsible for his being stricken with] a flaw [=[מום.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy