Kapłańska 10:9 Komentarz: Rashi, Kli Yakar, Ramban & Tur HaArokh

יַ֣יִן וְשֵׁכָ֞ר אַל־תֵּ֣שְׁתְּ ׀ אַתָּ֣ה ׀ וּבָנֶ֣יךָ אִתָּ֗ךְ בְּבֹאֲכֶ֛ם אֶל־אֹ֥הֶל מוֹעֵ֖ד וְלֹ֣א תָמֻ֑תוּ חֻקַּ֥ת עוֹלָ֖ם לְדֹרֹתֵיכֶֽם׃

"Wina, ani mocnego napoju nie będziesz pijał, ani ty, ani synowie twoi z tobą, gdy będziecie mieli wchodzić do przybytku zboru, abyście nie pomarli. Ustawa to wieczna w pokoleniach waszych. 

Rashi

ושכר ‎יין [DO NOT DRINK] WINE NOR STRONG DRINK — do not drink wine in a manner that brings out its intoxicating force (i. e. do not drink a “log” of wine) (Sifra, Shemini, Section 1 1; Keritot 13b).
Zapytaj rabinaBookmarkShareCopy

Kli Yakar

Wine and strong drink do not drink, etc. [God] placed this commandment here because wine was only created to comfort mourners (Eruvin 65), and Aaron might think that in his mourning he would at least be permitted to drink wine. Therefore, He warned him here that even in his mourning it is forbidden for him to drink it to the point of intoxication. Rashi explained regarding Aaron was silent that he received reward for his silence, in that this speech was designated to him alone. It is alluded here that anyone who cannot speak before the king is called drunk, therefore the speech was designated to him to instruct him not to be so drunk that he cannot speak before the king, but rather to be composed in his mind at all times so that he can respond. That is why it says And the Lord spoke to Aaron, saying: with the word saying, [God] sealed the entire matter for him, to tell you that he should always be ready to speak and respond to the King, blessed be He. And this entire commandment came to him by virtue of Aaron was silent.
Zapytaj rabinaBookmarkShareCopy

Ramban

DRINK NO WINE NOR STRONG DRINK. “[Do not drink] wine to such an extent that it has an intoxicating effect.” This is Rashi’s language. The meaning thereof is that if he paused during the drinking [of a fourth of a log of wine], or if he mixed a little water into it, he is free from punishment. The opinion of the Rabbi [Rashi] is thus that the priests were only prohibited from drinking wine, but not from other intoxicating drinks, the meaning of the term sheichar (strong drink) mentioned here being derived from the law of the Nazirite [where a similar expression appears,109He shall abstain from wine and ‘sheichar’ (strong drink) (Numbers 6:3). and only wine is forbidden to him].110The word sheichar must not therefore be understood as strong drink [as it is found in all English translations], but rather as “strong wine.” The vav in the Hebrew yayin v’sheichar (literally: “wine and strong wine”) is thus to be understood as if it said yayin k’shehu sheichar — you must not drink “wine when it is strong wine,” or “when it is intoxicating” (Mizrachi). Rambam’s opinion, however, as mentioned further on in the text, is that sheichar means “strong drink,” and the priests were warned against both — wine and strong drink, although the punishment for violation was different for each. This is correct according to my opinion. But in the opinion of Rabbi Moshe [ben Maimon],111Mishneh Torah, Hilchoth Bi’ath Hamikdash 1:2. however, other intoxicating drinks are prohibited [through a negative commandment, without being punishable by death, and the Service performed after drinking them is not invalidated, whereas for drinking wine the punishment is death by the hand of Heaven, and the Service is invalidated]; thus sheichar is to be understood in its plain sense [i.e., strong drink]. The reason why this commandment was given at that time, was in order that the priest should not go astray through the intoxicating effect of wine, and thus come to entertain some improper thought which might cause his death, as happened to [Aaron’s] sons. It is possible that when the Rabbis interpreted112Vayikra Rabbah 12:1. that Nadab and Abihu died because they entered the Sanctuary whilst intoxicated by wine, they meant to say that it was because of the wine they had drunk that they erred in the matter of the strange fire,113Above, Verse 1. but not that their punishment actually was because they had drunk the wine, since they had not yet been warned against it. Rather, their punishment was because they erred with respect to the fire of G-d, as I have alluded to.113Above, Verse 1.
Zapytaj rabinaBookmarkShareCopy