Powtórzonego Prawa 27:26 Midrasz: Bamidbar Rabbah, Kohelet Rabbah & Vayikra Rabbah

“The priest shall administer an oath to her, and he shall say to the woman: If a man has not lain with you, and if you did not stray in defilement while married to your husband, be absolved of this water of bitterness that causes curse” (Numbers 5:19).
“The priest shall administer an oath to her” – this is the oath that they will fulfill the Torah, just as it says: “This is the blood of the covenant that the Lord has made [with you regarding all these matters]” (Exodus 24:8). There is no covenant without an oath. This is what Moses said to them: If you fulfilled the oath of the covenant, “if [a man] has not lain…,” that you did not stray after idol worship, that you did not prostrate yourself to it. “And if you did not stray” – if you did not sacrifice; “defilement” – that you did not frolic before it; “be absolved of this water of bitterness” – just as it says: “He said: If You will heed the voice of the Lord your God [and will perform what is right in His eyes…all of the diseases that I placed on Egypt I will not place upon you]” (Exodus 15:26).
“But you, if you strayed while married to your husband, and if you were defiled, and a man has lain carnally with you, other than your husband” (Numbers 5:20).
“You, if you strayed” – this is one who sacrificed to the calf. “But you, if you strayed” – this is one who burned incense.¹⁷⁴To the calf. “If you were defiled” – this is one who poured libations. “And if you were defiled” – this is one who prostrated himself. “And a man has lain [carnally with you]” – this is one who accepted it upon them as a god, and said to it: “You are my god” (Isaiah 44:17). All these were with witnesses and without forewarning.¹⁷⁵See section 48, which describes who was punished by the water.
“The priest shall administer to the woman the oath of the curse, and the priest shall say to the woman: May the Lord render you as a curse and as an oath among your people, in the Lord causing your thigh to fall and your belly to distend” (Numbers 5:21).
“The priest shall administer to the woman the oath [of the curse [uvalato]]” – just as it says: “To pass you into the covenant of the Lord your God and His curse [uve’alato]” (Deuteronomy 29:11). A covenant is nothing other than an oath, just as it says: “Because both of them took an oath there. They made a covenant in Beersheba” (Genesis 21:31–32). From where is it derived that they took an oath with a curse [ala] at Sinai? It is as it is written: “These are the words of the covenant [that the Lord commanded Moses to make with the children of Israel in the land of Moav], besides the covenant that He made with them at Ḥorev” (Deuteronomy 28:69). It juxtaposes the covenant at Ḥorev with the covenant in the land of Moav. Just as there it was with an ala, so too, here it is with an ala. Which is the covenant at Ḥorev? “But if you will not heed Me…” (Leviticus 26:14). “And the priest shall say to the woman” – this is Moses. “May the Lord render you as a curse and as an oath…” – these are the curses in the book of Leviticus.
“This water that causes curse will enter your innards, to cause the belly to distend and the thigh to collapse; and the woman shall say: Amen, amen” (Numbers 5:22).
“This water that causes curse will enter” – this is the water of the brook into which Moses cast the gold dust of the calf, and Moses administered an oath to them by everything that they had received at Sinai that the water would examine them. “Will enter” is written here three times corresponding to the three sentences to which the worshippers of the calf were sentenced: The sword, examination by water, and a plague.
“To cause the belly to distend and the thigh to collapse” – it teaches that even Aaron, the paramour,¹⁷⁶He is likened to the paramour because he facilitated the sin of the Golden Calf. was punished with them, as it is stated: “And [the Lord] was incensed with Aaron [to destroy him]” (Deuteronomy 9:20). “To destroy him” is nothing other than the death of children, just as it says: “I destroyed his fruit from above…” (Amos 2:9). All his sons were fit to die, but Moses prayed on his behalf and the two died corresponding to the two curses stated here: “To cause belly [beten] to distend and thigh [yarekh] to collapse.” From where is it derived that the verse is speaking of the death of children? It is as it is written: “The womb [habaten] is a reward” (Psalms 127:3); “the fruit of your womb [bitnekha]” (Deuteronomy 7:13); and it said: “Who emerged from Jacob’s loins [yerekh]” (Exodus 1:5).
And the two remained. Likewise it says: “For every matter of transgression” (Exodus 22:8) – it is speaking of Aaron, who caused Israel to transgress the commandment: “You shall not have [other gods]” (Exodus 20:3). “For an ox” (Exodus 22:8) – just as it says: “They exchanged their Glory for the molded image of an ox” (Psalms 106:20). “For a donkey” (Exodus 22:8) – these are the Egyptians,¹⁷⁷The reference is to the Egyptians who left Egypt with Moses. who are called donkeys, just as it says: “Whose [flesh] is the flesh of donkeys” (Ezekiel 23:20); they incited Israel to craft the calf. “For a sheep” (Exodus 22:8) – this is Israel, who strayed after it and are called sheep, just as it says: “Israel is scattered sheep” (Jeremiah 50:17). “For a garment [salma]” (Exodus 22:8) – that they crowned it as king over them, just as it says: “You have a garment [simla]; be our ruler” (Isaiah 3:6). “For any lost item” (Exodus 22:8) – as they lost what they said at Sinai: “Everything that the Lord has spoken we will perform” (Exodus 19:8). “Regarding which he says: This is it” (Exodus 22:8) – as they said regarding the calf: “This is your god, Israel” (Exodus 32:4). “The statements of both of them shall come before the judges [elohim]” (Exodus 22:8) – this is Moses, who is called elohim: “See, I have placed you as a god [elohim] for Pharaoh” (Exodus 7:1). “Whomever elohim condemns [yarshiun]” (Exodus 22:8) – this is Moses; yarshian is written.¹⁷⁸Yarshiun is plural; however, as it is written without the vav, it is expounded in the singular, yarshian, as a reference to Moses. “Shall pay double to the other [lere’ehu]” (Exodus 22:8) – these are his [Aaron’s] two sons that he paid to the Holy One blessed be He, who is a Companion [re’a] of Israel,¹⁷⁹See Psalms 122:8. as they died.
“And the woman shall say: Amen, [amen]” – this is Israel, who answered amen after the curse of idol worship, just as it says: “Cursed is the man who will craft an idol…[and the entire people shall answer and say: Amen]” (Deuteronomy 27:15). Why “amen” twice? It corresponds to “cursed” in particular and “cursed” in general, just as it says: “Cursed is one who will not uphold [the matters of this Torah to perform them, and the entire people shall say: Amen] (Deuteronomy 27:26).

“Wisdom is good with inheritance, and more so for viewers of the sun. For in the shadow of wisdom, in the shadow of money; the advantage of knowledge is that wisdom preserves the life of its possessors” (Ecclesiastes 7:11–12).
“Wisdom is good with inheritance” – “wisdom is good” when it is an inheritance. Alternatively, “wisdom is good” when it is accompanied by inheritance, as we learned there in Avot (2:2): Torah study is best with a worldly occupation, etc. Alternatively, “wisdom is good” – the wisdom of Moses is good, as it is stated: “A wise man ascended against the city of the mighty” (Proverbs 21:22);⁷²This is a reference to Moses ascending heavenward to the stronghold of the angels to receive the Torah. “with inheritance” – as he bequeathed the Torah to Israel.
Another matter, “wisdom is good” – this is the wisdom of Betzalel, who bequeathed the Ark to Israel. When Moses said to him: ‘Craft an Ark, vessels, and the Tabernacle,’ Betzalel said to him: ‘Moses our master, does one bring the vessels and position them exposed to the air? Let the Tabernacle be crafted first and the Ark be crafted afterward.’ Moses said to him: ‘Were you, perhaps, sitting in the shadow of God and you knew? First, “they shall craft the Ark” (Exodus 25:10) and then, “the Tabernacle you shall craft” (Exodus 26:1)’ – that is, “wisdom is good with inheritance,” the wisdom of Betzalel is good, “with inheritance,” as he bequeathed the Ark to Israel.
Another matter, the wisdom of Joshua is good “with inheritance,” as he bequeathed the land; “and more so for viewers of the sun.”⁷³This is a reference to the miracle performed for Joshua in which the sun’s orbit was delayed; see Joshua 10:12–13. Alternatively, “wisdom is good” when it is accompanied by the merit of the forefathers. Happy is one for whom the merit of his forefathers stands and illuminates for him.
Rabbi Aḥa [said] in the name of Rabbi Tanḥum: If a person studied, taught, observed, and performed [the Torah’s commandments], and he had the wherewithal to support,⁷⁴He was able to facilitate Torah study or the performance of mitzvot by others. but he did not support, he is in the category of: “Cursed is one who will not uphold the matters of this Torah” (Deuteronomy 27:26). If a person studied, did not teach, did not observe, and did not perform, and he did not have the wherewithal to support, but he [nonetheless] supported, he is in the category of: “Blessed is one who will uphold,” as every “cursed” indicates “blessed.”⁷⁵Although the Torah mentions only the curses for those who sin or fail to perform those mitzvot, by inference, all those who refrain from sin or perform those mitzvot are blessed. Rabbi Huna said: The Holy One blessed be He is destined to provide shade and a canopy⁷⁶The supporters of Torah study will be rewarded and accorded honor together with the Torah scholars. for those who have [performed] mitzvot with those who have [studied] Torah. What is the reason? “For in the shadow of wisdom, in the shadow of money.”
Three hundred nazirites ascended⁷⁷To Jerusalem. to sacrifice nine hundred offerings⁷⁸A nazirite is obligated to bring three offerings at the conclusion of his term as a nazirite: a burnt offering, a sin offering, and a peace offering. However, these nazirites did not have the means to pay for their offerings. during the days of Shimon ben Shetaḥ. For one hundred and fifty [of the nazirites], he found an extenuation,⁷⁹A flaw in their initial vow which enabled him to nullify their vows of naziriteship; they therefore were not obligated to bring the three offerings. and for one hundred and fifty he did not find an extenuation. Shimon ben Shetaḥ went up to King Yannai [and] said to him: ‘Three hundred nazirites ascended and they need to sacrifice nine hundred offerings, but they do not have [the means to purchase] them. You give half from yours and I will give half from mine, and they will go and sacrifice.’ Yannai gave them half [the required sum] and they went and sacrificed. Someone went and spoke slander to King Yannai about Shimon ben Shetaḥ. He said to King Yannai: ‘You should know that everything that they sacrificed was from yours, but Shimon ben Shetaḥ did not give anything from his.’ [King Yannai] heard [this] and became angry at Shimon ben Shetaḥ, and Shimon ben Shetaḥ heard [that King Yannai was angry] and he fled.
Some time later, there were important personages there from the kingdom of Persia, who were sitting at the table of King Yannai. After they ate, they said to Yannai, ‘My lord the king, we recall that there was an elder here who would say words of Torah to us.’ [Yannai] said to Salome, [Shimon ben Shetaḥ’s] sister, [who was] King Yannai’s wife: ‘Send [for him] and bring him.’ She said to him: ‘Give me your word⁸⁰That you will not harm him. and send him your ring⁸¹As a sign of good faith. and he will come.’ He gave her his word and [Shimon ben Shetaḥ] came. When he came, he sat between the king and the queen. [Yannai] said to him: ‘Why did you flee?’ He said to [Yannai]: ‘I heard you were angry at me, and I was afraid of you. I fled so you would not execute me. I fulfilled this verse: “Hide for a brief moment until the wrath has passed”’ (Isaiah 26:20). [Yannai] said to him: ‘Why did you deceive me?’ He said to [Yannai]: ‘God forbid, I did not deceive you; rather, you [gave] from your property and I [gave] from my Torah,⁸²Shimon ben Shetaḥ had used his Torah knowledge to annul the vows of half the nazirites, thus exempting them from bringing their sacrifices. as it is written: “For in the shadow of wisdom, in the shadow of money.”’ [Yannai] said to him: ‘Why did you sit between the king and the queen?’ He said to [Yannai]: ‘It is because it is written in the book of Ben Sira: “Extol it and it will exalt you, and it will seat you between leaders.” [Yannai] said to him: ‘Do you see that I honor you more than anyone?’ He said to [Yannai]: ‘It is not you who honor me, but rather my Torah honors me, as it is written: “Extol it and it will exalt you” (Proverbs 4:8).’ [Yannai] said to them:⁸³To his servants ‘Pour him a cup [of wine] so he can recite Grace after Meals.’ [Shimon ben Shetaḥ] said: ‘What will I recite? Shall I say: Blessed is He from whose [food] Yannai has eaten?’⁸⁴Generally, when three men participate in a meal, Grace after Meals is preceded by zimmun, an introductory section in which one of the lines is: Blessed is He from whose [food] we have eaten. However, in this instance Shimon ben Shetaḥ had not actually eaten. [Yannai said:] ‘You remain in your stubbornness; I have never heard Yannai in the Grace after Meals.’ [Shimon ben Shetaḥ] said: ‘What, then, shall I say: Blessed that we ate? I have not eaten.’ [Yannai] said to them: ‘Bring him [food] so he will eat.’ [After having eaten, Shimon ben Shetaḥ recited the Grace after Meals] and said: ‘From whose [food] we have eaten.’
Rabbi Yoḥanan said: The colleagues of Shimon ben Shetaḥ disagree with him. Rabbi Avin said: Regarding the second.⁸⁵Shimon ben Shetaḥ had not actually eaten bread. His colleagues held that one cannot recite Grace after Meals on behalf of those who ate bread if one did not himself eat bread. Rabbi Yirmeya said: Regarding the first.⁸⁶The nazirites had come from outside of the Land of Israel to sacrifice offerings. His colleagues maintained that it is impossible to complete the period of naziriteship there in ritual purity. They reversed the opinion of Rabbi Yirmeya, as there it is clear for him, while here it requires [resolution].⁸⁷There, regarding the incident with Shimon ben Shetaḥ, it was clearly stated that his colleagues disagreed with him, whereas regarding the laws of Grace after Meals, Rabbi Yirmeya was not sure about the halakha. [Alternatively,] there, it is clear for him, in accordance with the opinion of Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel,⁸⁸It is clear to Rabbi Yirmeya that Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel disagreed with Shimon ben Shetaḥ. while here it requires [resolution], according to the Rabbis,⁸⁹When Rabbi Yirmeya sought clarification, it was about the opinion of the Rabbis. as it is taught in this regard: If one reclined and dipped with them, even though he did not eat with them an olive-bulk of grain, they include him in their zimmun; [this is] the statement of the Rabbis.⁹⁰Rabbi Yirmeya was unsure whether the individual who did not eat grain could be counted for the zimmun, which requires three men, or whether he could even recite the zimmun and Grace after Meals on behalf of the others. Rabbi Yaakov bar Aḥa said in the name of Rabbi Isi: Actually, one does not include him in the zimun unless he eats an olive-bulk of grain. It is taught: Two who ate grain and one who ate something other than grain join together.⁹¹The implication of this phrase is that they may join together for the zimmun but the individual who did not eat grain may not be the one to recite the zimmun and the Grace after Meals. In accordance with whose opinion is this taught? It is in accordance with [the opinion of] Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel.
There were three prominent wealthy leaders in Jerusalem:⁹²This was during the Roman siege on Jerusalem. Ben Tzitzit HaKesat, Nakdimon ben Guryon, and ben Kalba Savua. Each and every one of them was capable of providing for and sustaining the country for ten years. There was [a warrior] there [named] ben-Batiaḥ, the son of Rabbi Yoḥanan ben Zakkai’s sister, who was the official in charge of the storehouses, and the leader of the rebels in Jerusalem. He arose and burned the storehouses. Rabbi Yoḥanan ben Zakkai heard and said: ‘Alas.’ They went and told ben-Batiaḥ that his uncle had said: ‘Alas, alas.’ He sent and had him brought [and] said to him: ‘Why did you say alas?’ [Rabbi Yoḥanan] said to him: ‘I did not say alas [vai], but I said hurrah [vah], for as long as the full storehouses are intact, they will not give their lives to wage war.’ By the difference between vai and vah, Rabbi Yoḥanan was spared. They read in his regard: “The advantage of knowledge is that wisdom preserves the life of its possessors.”
There was an incident involving Rabbi Yoḥanan, who was overcome with bulmus,⁹³This results from great hunger and its symptoms include trembling and a loss of eyesight. and he went to Emmaus. He sat to the east of a fig tree⁹⁴He ate figs from the tree. and was cured. They said to him: ‘From where did you know [that figs could cure you of this condition]?’ He said to them: ‘From David, as it is written: “They gave him a slice of pressed figs”’ (I Samuel 30:12). They read in his regard: “The advantage of knowledge is that wisdom preserves the life of its possessors.”
Rabbi Yosei bar Yasin was traveling on a ship coming from Tarshish. His lad said to him: ‘I need to descend.’⁹⁵He needed to immerse in the sea due to the ritual impurity of a seminal emission. [Rabbi Yosei] said to him: ‘Do not descend into the sea, as the sea is dangerous.’ [The lad] said to him: ‘I must recite shema.’⁹⁶It was prohibited for one who experienced a seminal emission to recite shema or blessings (see Berakhot 20b). He said to [the lad]: ‘Recite it.’ [The lad] said to him: ‘I need to eat.’⁹⁷This involves reciting the blessings over food. He said to [the lad]: ‘Eat.’ When they came to port, he said to [the lad]: It is prohibited for you until you immerse.⁹⁸He permitted reciting shema and reciting the blessings without immersion only at sea, due to the danger. It was read in his regard: “The advantage of knowledge is that wisdom preserves the life of its possessors.”
Rabbi Meir was wanted by the government, and he fled. He passed an Aramean inn and found them sitting and partaking of “that species.”⁹⁹Pig meat. They saw him [and] said: ‘It is him, it is not him.’¹⁰⁰Roman officials saw him but were not absolutely sure it was him. They said: ‘[To see] if it is him, let us invite him [and see] if he comes to eat with us.’ [Rabbi Meir] dipped one of his fingers into the pig’s blood and put a different finger into his mouth; he dipped this one and sucked that one. [The Romans thought he had eaten the pig blood and] said to each other: ‘Were he Rabbi Meir, he would not have done so.’ They let him be, and he fled. It was read in his regard: “The advantage of knowledge is that wisdom preserves the life of its possessors.”
Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi] was dying in Tzippori, and the residents of Tzippori said: ‘Anyone who comes and says that Rabbi died, we will kill him.’ Bar Kappara¹⁰¹He was one of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi’s disciples and was with him as he died. went to the window and looked outside, and his head was covered and his garments were rent. He said: ‘Our brethren, descendants of Yedaya,¹⁰²Beginning in the Second Temple period, the members of the priestly watch of Yedaya resided in the city of Tzippori. hear me, hear me. Angels and righteous people grasped the Tablets of the covenant. Angels overcame the righteous, and they snatched the Tablets.’¹⁰³This was his way of saying that Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi’s soul had ascended to heaven. They said to him: ‘Has Rabbi died?’ He said to them: ‘You said so, I did not say so.’ Why did he not say? Because it is written: “One who utters a negative report is a fool” (Proverbs 10:18). They rent their garments until the sound of the rending reached Gufteta, at a distance of three mil. It was read in his regard:¹⁰⁴Regarding bar Kappara. “The advantage of knowledge is that wisdom preserves the life of its possessors.”
Rabbi Neḥemya [said] in the name of Rabbi Mana: Miraculous acts were performed on that day. It was Friday and all the cities gathered for Rabbi’s eulogy. They stopped his [burial procession to eulogize him] at eighteen synagogues, and took him to Beit She’arim,¹⁰⁵That was Rabbi’s home. Several years earlier he had taken ill and he moved to Tzippori. and the day lasted until each and every one of the people of Israel reached home and kindled a lamp for himself, roasted a fish for himself, and filled a barrel of water for himself, until the last of them did so; [then] the sun set and the rooster crowed.¹⁰⁶The rooster crowed signifying daybreak, which came just after sunset because sunset had been miraculously delayed for so long. [The people] began to become agitated and said: ‘Alas, we have desecrated Shabbat!’ A Divine Voice called out and said: ‘Anyone who was not indolent in the eulogy of Rabbi is destined for life in the World to Come except for the launderer, who was there, but did not come.’¹⁰⁷He was in the town but did not come to the funeral. When [the launderer] heard [this], he ascended and cast himself from the roof, and he fell and died. A Divine Voice called out and said: ‘Even the launderer [who was on] the roof is destined for life in the World to Come.’

“On the eighth day, prince of the children of Manasseh, Gamliel son of Pedatzur” (Numbers 7:54).
“On the eighth day, prince of the children of Manasseh, Gamliel son of Pedatzur” – that is what is written: “I keep the king’s directive, [and in regard to the word of an oath to God]” (Ecclesiastes 8:2). If the king will say to you that his fear shall be upon you and you shall observe his decrees, observe his decrees. Likewise, it says: “You shall set a king over you” (Deuteronomy 17:15) – that his fear shall be upon you. And it says: “Any man who will disobey your directive, [and does not heed your words in everything that you command him, will be put to death]” (Joshua 1:18). “I” that is written here is nothing other than fear of the monarchy, just as Pharaoh said to Joseph. That is what is written: “Pharaoh said to Joseph: I am Pharaoh, and without you no man shall lift his hand…” (Genesis 41:44). What is “I am Pharaoh”? This is what Pharaoh said to Joseph: Even though I said to you: “You will be in charge of my house…” (Genesis 41:40) – that I made you king over everyone – be careful to treat me with respect and make me king over you. That is why he said: “I am Pharaoh” – in other words, that the fear of my kingship shall be upon you.
Similarly, “God spoke to Moses, and He said to him: I am the Lord” (Exodus 6:2) – why was it necessary to say here: “I am the Lord”? Rather, the Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: Even though I set you as a god for Pharaoh, as the verse states: “See, I have made you a god to Pharaoh” (Exodus 7:1) be careful that my Godliness will be upon you, as I made you a god only over Pharaoh alone. That is, “I keep the king’s directive” (Ecclesiastes 8:2) – it is “I” who requires you to “keep the king’s directive” – that his fear shall be upon you. Make certain that you do not flout his commands. Is it, perhaps, even if he tells you to violate the words of the Omnipresent? The verse states: “And in regard to the word of an oath to God” (Ecclesiastes 8:2) – the verse comes to inform you that “and in regard to the word of an oath of God” will be paramount over the command of flesh and blood, as you should nullify the will of flesh and blood before the will of God and fulfill all the commandments that are in the Torah, as you entered into an oath in their regard to fulfill them, just as it says: “To pass you into the covenant of the Lord your God and into His oath…” (Deuteronomy 29:11), and it says: “[Cursed be] who will not uphold the matters of this Torah to perform them; and the entire people shall say: Amen” (Deuteronomy 27:26).
Similarly, “each of you shall fear his mother and his father…” (Leviticus 19:3) – is it, perhaps, even if his father said to him: Slaughter for me and cook for me on Shabbat, that he should listen to him? The verse states: “And you shall observe My Shabbatot” (Leviticus 19:3) – all of you are obligated in My honor. Here too, “and the word of an oath to God” (Ecclesiastes 8:2) – as above the word of the king observe the word of an oath to God.
“Do not be frightened; leave his presence [mipanav]; [do not remain in a bad situation, as he will do what he wills]” (Ecclesiastes 8:3). If [a king of] flesh and blood will become angry at you in order to cause you to violate the statutes of the Torah, do not be frightened by his anger and follow his counsel, just as it says: “Who has not walked in the counsel of the wicked” (Psalms 1:1). Panav is nothing other than his anger, just as it says: “And the expression on his face [anpohi] was distorted” (Daniel 3:19). That is, “leave his presence”; “do not remain in a bad situation [bedavar]” – do not remain in his path to follow it, just as it says: “And did not remain in the path of sinners” (Psalms 1:1).
What is “bedavar” (Ecclesiastes 8:3)? It is that you should not fear that evil matter, that he will say to you that he will burn you, kill you, or subject you to harsh suffering if you do not fulfill his decree, and he will threaten you that there is no God in the world who will be able to rescue you from his hand. That is what is written thereafter: “As he will do what he wills” (Ecclesiastes 8:3). Just as Nebuchadnezzar said to Ḥananya, Mishael, and Azarya: “At that time you will be cast into the burning fiery furnace; who is the god who will save you from my hands?” (Daniel 3:15). “Since authority is by the king’s word, [who will say to him: What are you doing?]” (Ecclesiastes 8:4). If you devote yourself to the mitzvot to fulfill the decree of the Holy One blessed be He and to nullify the decrees of flesh and blood, what is your reward? When the Holy One blessed be He issues a decree to bring calamity to the world – as he is the King of the world and Ruler of everything, to do everything that He desires and no one can impede him: “He is of one mind, and who can respond to Him? His soul desires, and He does” (Job 23:13) – you will stand and ask for mercy regarding the decree to abrogate it. The Holy One blessed be He will show forbearance to you, and He will nullify it because you nullified the decree of flesh and blood in order to fulfill His decree. That is why it is stated: “Since authority is by the king’s word” – this is the Holy One blessed be He, when He says to bring something to the world to inform of his authority in the world, just as it says: “God caused that they would experience fear before Him” (Ecclesiastes 3:14). Know, who can impede His decree and say to Him: ‘Why are You doing so’? It is one who observes mitzvot. That is why it is stated: “Who will say to him: What are you doing?” Who can say to Him: ‘Why are You doing this to Your creations? Descend to them with the attribute of mercy’? That is one who observes His mitzvot. That is what is written: “One who observes a mitzva [will know no evil matter]” (Ecclesiastes 8:5).
What is “will know no evil matter” (Ecclesiastes 8:5)? It is measure for measure; he did not remain in a bad situation, therefore, “he will know no evil matter.” “A wise man’s heart will know the time and judgment” (Ecclesiastes 8:5) – as there is a wise man who considers the consequences and reckons the loss from a mitzva against its reward and the loss from a transgression against its reward. He considers in his heart: If I transgress His mitzvot, and I have an opportunity to do what I want and there is no one who can impede me, tomorrow, the time will come when the Holy One blessed be He will execute judgment against him⁴⁴Referring to himself. because he violated His Torah. Likewise it says: “The wise man’s eyes are in his head, but the fool [walks in darkness]” (Ecclesiastes 2:14). And it says: “The heart of the wise inclines to his right, [and the heart of a fool inclines to his left]” (Ecclesiastes 10:2). “A wise man’s heart will know the time and judgment” – one whose heart is wise knows that if he transgresses the mitzvot, that the time will come when the Holy One blessed be He will execute judgment against him, and he refrains from the transgression. That is what is written thereafter: “For there is a time and a judgment for every matter…” (Ecclesiastes 8:6) – regarding every situation where a person performs his will and nullifies the will of the Omnipresent, it should be known to him that he is destined to be judged. Even though retribution is not exacted from him immediately, let him not think that the Holy One blessed be He would overlook his iniquity for him, but rather, He is slow to anger and collects what is due to Him. When does He exact retribution from him? It is when the hin is filled. Likewise it says: “With the filling of his quota, he will be troubled; [the hand of all travail will come upon him]” (Job 20:22). That is why it is stated: “As the evil of man overwhelms him” (Ecclesiastes 8:6); just as He did with the generation of the Flood, as He gave them an extension but ultimately exacted retribution from them, just as it says: “The Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth…” (Genesis 6:5). What is written thereafter? “The Lord said: I will obliterate man…” (Genesis 6:7).
“For he does not know what will be, [for whenever it will be, who will have told him]?” (Ecclesiastes 8:7). The verse comes to teach you that anyone who does not repent from a transgression that he committed and does not fear the Day of Judgment, when it will arrive they will not show him forbearance. Were he to come and say that he be given an extension so he could repent, they will not listen to him. That is, for whenever punishment “will be, who will have told him” so he would repent and be accepted. It is to say to you that prior to the sentence they listen to him; after the sentence they do not listen to him. That is why it is stated: “For whenever it will be, who will have told him?”
“There is no man who rules the spirit [to retain the spirit, and there is no rule on the day of death, and there is no sending a proxy in war, and wickedness will not rescue its owner]” (Ecclesiastes 8:8) – because we found that the Holy One blessed be He decreed four court-imposed death penalties for performers of transgressions. That is why four matters are written here, corresponding to them, where the living lack the ability to be rescued from them after their sentence. These are: “There is no man who rules the spirit [ruaḥ] to retain the spirit” – this is death by strangulation and the like, as a person dies from it only due to breath [ruaḥ], as he has no place from which to breathe. That is, “there is no man who rules the spirit” to exhale it when the day comes that the breath will be constricted in his body. “And there is no rule on the day of death” – this is death by stoning and the like, just as it says: “You shall stone him with stones, and he will die” (Deuteronomy 13:11). “There is no sending a proxy in war” – this is death by decapitation by sword and the like, just as it says: “Go out and wage war with Amalek” (Exodus 17:9), and it is written: “Joshua weakened [Amalek and its people by sword]” (Exodus 17:13). “And wickedness will not rescue its owner” – this is death by burning and the like, just as it says: “All the criminals and all the doers of wickedness will be straw; the day that is coming will burn them…” (Malachi 3:19). These are the four court-imposed death penalties mentioned in this verse.
Even though the Sanhedrin ceased and the four court-imposed death penalties were abrogated, the sentence of the four court-imposed death penalties were not abrogated, as the Holy One blessed be He judges the living to die of them with harsh punishments corresponding to them. One who incurs liability to be strangled either drowns in the river, dies of diphtheria, or is delivered into the hands of idol worshippers who strangle him. One who incurs liability to be stoned either falls off the roof, or a beast tramples him, or idol worshippers stone him. One who incurs liability to be beheaded, robbers come upon him and behead him. One who incurs liability to be burned either falls into the fire or a snake bites him. You learned that a person cannot escape the judgment of the Holy One blessed be He that He will not punish him measure for measure. That is why it is stated: “There is no man who rules the spirit….” (Ecclesiastes 8:8).
Another matter: “I keep the king’s directive” (Ecclesiastes 8:2) – it is speaking of Joseph the righteous, who observed the “I” that Pharaoh had said to him, just as it says: “Pharaoh said to Joseph: I am Pharaoh, [and without you no man shall lift his hand]” (Genesis 41:44), as he never flouted his command. “And the word of an oath to God” (Ecclesiastes 8:2) – as even though he entered into that prominence, he did not throw the yoke of Heaven from upon him and he feared the Holy One blessed be He, just as it says: “[I fear] God” (Genesis 42:18). That is why “God” is stated.⁴⁵According to the Etz Yosef, the midrash is explaining that this is an allusion to the verse, “And the word of an oath to God” (Ecclesiastes 8:2). He was very cautious regarding the oath, as he did not take an oath “as the Lord lives,” but rather, “as Pharaoh lives, that you will not depart from here” (Genesis 42:15). That is, “an oath.” What is “the word of [divrat]”? It is because he separated himself from lasciviousness, just as it says: “He shall not see a lascivious matter [davar] in you” (Deuteronomy 23:15). And it says: The young woman, because [al devar] she did not cry out in the city…” (Deuteronomy 22:24). Likewise it says: “His master’s wife cast her eyes upon Joseph, and she said: Lie with me” (Genesis 39:7). What is written there? “He refused, and he said to his master’s wife: Behold, my master…” (Genesis 39:8). That is why it is stated: “The word of [divrat],” just as it says: “It was, as she spoke [kedabra] to Joseph day after day, and he did not heed her…” (Genesis 39:10).
“Do not be frightened; [leave] his presence” – when he entered the house to perform his labor, and the house was vacant and there was no person who could see him, just as it is written: “It was, on a certain day he went into the house to perform his labor, and there was no one [of the people of the household there in the house]” (Genesis 39:11), she came and seized his garment so that he would lie with her. Nevertheless, he was not frightened by her actions, and he went outside, just as it says: “He left his garment in her hand, fled, and went outside” (Genesis 39:12). That is why it is stated: “Do not be frightened; [leave] his presence.” He was not frightened by the house being vacant, but rather he fled and left, even though she said to him that if he would not lie with her, she would say to her husband that he sought to rape her, and her husband will kill him, and there would be no one to impede him, because he is his slave. Nevertheless, he did not allow her to fulfill her desire because of that evil matter that she threatened to do to him. That is why it says: “Do not remain in a bad situation, as God will do what He wills” (Ecclesiastes 8:3). From where do you derive that she threatened him in that manner? It is from the end of the matter. When she saw that her actions were to no avail, look at what she did: “She called to the people of her household, and spoke to them, saying.… It was, when he heard.… She placed his garment [beside her, until his master’s arrival home]. She spoke to him…[saying: The Hebrew slave whom you brought to us came to me to mock me]. It was, as I raised my voice [and cried out, that he left his garment with me, and fled outside]” (Genesis 39:14–18).
“Since authority is by the king’s word…” (Ecclesiastes 8:4) – what reward did the Holy One blessed be He give him for this? He placed him in a position of authority in the land of Egypt. That is what is written: “Since [authority is] by the king’s word…,” just as it says: “Pharaoh spoke to Joseph: In my dream, behold, I am…” (Genesis 41:17). “Authority” – just as it says: “Joseph was the ruler over the land” (Genesis 42:6). “Who will say to him: What are you doing?” (Ecclesiastes 8:4), just as it says: “Go to Joseph; what he says to you, you shall do” (Genesis 41:55). Why to that extent? It is because he observed the mitzvot. That is what is written: “One who observes a mitzva will know no evil matter” (Ecclesiastes 8:5). What is “will know no evil matter”? It is this evil matter that the butler said, just as it says: “There with us was a Hebrew lad, a slave of the chief executioner…” (Genesis 41:12). He said three matters here in Joseph’s regard: “Lad” – that he was a fool, just as it says: “Folly is bound in the heart of a lad” (Proverbs 22:15); “Hebrew” – an enemy; “slave” – that he is not worthy of kingship. Nevertheless, Joseph knew no evil matter. In other words, the matter did not affect him, as he ruled.
“A wise man’s heart will know the time and judgment” (Ecclesiastes 8:5) – this was Joseph, who was called wise, just as it says: “There is no one as wise and understanding as you” (Genesis 41:39). He knew that he would be held accountable had he touched Potifar’s wife; that is why he withdrew from her. That is what is written: “He did not heed her [to lie with her, to be with her]” (Genesis 39:10); “to lie with her” in this world; “to be with her” in the World to Come.
Another matter: “A wise man’s heart will know the time and judgment” (Ecclesiastes 8:5) – this is the Holy One blessed be He, in whose regard it is written: “Wise of heart and mighty of power” (Job 9:4). He brought about a time to reward Joseph on the basis of measure for measure. How so? He ruled over his inclination and did not touch her; therefore, he became a ruler, just as it says: “Joseph was the ruler over the land” (Genesis 42:6). He did not heed her, just as it says: “He did not heed her” (Genesis 39:10); therefore, the Holy One blessed be He crowned him as king over Egypt in its entirety, and everyone heeded his words, just as it says: “What he says to you, you shall do” (Genesis 41:55). His mouth [piv] did not kiss [nashak] in transgression; therefore, “at your directive [pikha] my entire people will be sustained [yishak]” (Genesis 41:40). He said: “There is no one greater in this house than I…” (Genesis 39:9) in order to rebuff her; therefore, “you will be in charge of my house” (Genesis 41:40). He did not seize her, but she seized him with her hands, just as it says: “She seized him by his garment…” (Genesis 39:12); therefore, “Pharaoh removed his signet ring from upon his hand, and he placed it upon Joseph’s hand” (Genesis 41:42). He left his garment in her hand; therefore, “he dressed him in linen garments” (Genesis 41:42). He did not bend his neck toward her; therefore, “he placed a gold chain on his neck” (Genesis 41:42). He did not mount [rakhav] her; therefore, “he had him ride [vayarkev] in the second chariot that he had” (Genesis 41:43). She called the people of her household in this regard, just as it says: “She called the people of her household…” (Genesis 39:14); therefore, “they called before him: Kneel” (Genesis 41:43). He was relegated to the prison for this, just as it says: “He relegated him [vayitenehu] to the prison” (Genesis 39:20); therefore, “he appointed him [venaton oto] over the land of Egypt” (Genesis 41:43). He did not direct his glance toward her, and not toward the Egyptian women when he ruled, just as it says: “Joseph is a fruitful son, a fruitful bough alongside a spring [alei ayin]” (Genesis 49:22), as he averted his eye [she’ilem eino] from Potifar’s wife and from the Egyptian women.
“Branches [banot]⁴⁶Banot can also mean women. ran atop the wall [alei shur]” (Genesis 49:22). Therefore, alei shur. Rabbi Reuven said: What is alei shur? The Holy One blessed be He said: It is incumbent upon me to pay a reward for that eye. How so? The Rabbis taught that in the Temple they would eat offerings of lesser sanctity within the wall, within the wall of Jerusalem. But in Shilo, which was in the portion of Joseph, they would eat it within eyeshot.⁴⁷Within eyeshot of the Tabernacle (Rambam, Mishna Zevaḥim 14:6). That is alei shur, just as it says: “The eye of one who sees me will not behold me [teshureni]” (Job 7:8). Rabbi Azarya said: The Holy One blessed be He said to Joseph: You observed the mitzva of: “You shall not commit adultery” (Exodus 20:13), which is the seventh of the Commandments, and you did not commit adultery with Potifar’s wife. And you observed the mitzva of: “You shall not steal” (Exodus 20:13), which is the eighth of the Commandments, as you did not steal Potifar’s property and you did not “steal” his wife, just as it says: “The eye of the adulterer observes the night, saying: No eye will behold [teshureni] me…” (Job 24:15). The time will come when I will repay you for them. Tomorrow, when the princes come to bring [offerings] for the dedication of the altar, the princes of your two sons, one will present his offering on the seventh day, and the second on the eighth day. And no other tribe will interpose between your two sons, just as you did not interpose⁴⁸Namely, you did not differentiate between them. You observed both of them. As a reward, Benjamin did not interpose between Ephraim and Manasseh. between “you shall not commit adultery” and “you shall not steal,” as it is written: “On the seventh day, prince of the children of Ephraim.… On the eighth day, prince of the children of Manasseh…” (Numbers 7:48–54) That is why it is written: “A wise man’s heart will know the time and judgment” (Ecclesiastes 8:5).