וְלִזְבוּלֻ֣ן אָמַ֔ר שְׂמַ֥ח זְבוּלֻ֖ן בְּצֵאתֶ֑ךָ וְיִשָּׂשכָ֖ר בְּאֹהָלֶֽיךָ׃
A o Zebulunie rzekł: "Ciesz się Zebulunie wyjściem twojém, a Isacharze namiotami twoimi!
Midrash Tanchuma
Zebulun shall dwell at the shore of the sea (Gen. 49:13). Zebulun was mentioned before Issachar even though Issachar was the elder. Why? Zebulun was engaged in commercial activity, while Issachar devoted himself to the study of the Torah, and they had agreed that Zebulun’s earnings would be shared by Issachar. That is why Moses blessed them: Rejoice, Zebulun, in thy going out, and Issachar in thy tents (Deut. 33:18). Rejoice, Zebulun, in going about to do business, for Issachar is in your tents studying the Torah. Why should he rejoice? Because the Torah is a tree of life to them that lay hold upon her, and happy is everyone that holdeth her fast (Prov. 3:8). Therefore Zebulun preceded Issachar. If it had not been for Zebulun, Issachar could not have studied the Torah. Since Issachar engaged exclusively in the study of the Torah, and was not concerned with business nor did any kind of work, it is written about him: And the children of Issachar, men that had understanding of the times (I Chron. 12:33).
Bamidbar Rabbah
“On the second day, Netanel son of Tzuar, prince of Issachar, presented his offering” (Numbers 7:18).
“He presented his offering: One silver dish, its weight one hundred and thirty; one silver basin of seventy shekels, in the sacred shekel; both of them full of high quality flour mixed with oil as a meal offering” (Numbers 7:19).
Why does it say in his regard: “Presented his offering [hikriv]”? (Numbers 7:18). It is because Reuben came and appealed. He said: ‘It is enough that Judah preceded me, just as he did on the journeys. I will present the [next] offering, in accordance with birth order.’ Moses reprimanded him and said to him: 'From the mouth of the Holy One blessed be He, it was stated to me: ‘Present the offerings [hakrev] in accordance with the journeys.’51Since the camp of Judah went first in the journeys, the tribes in that camp sacrificed first. Within each camp, the Torah orders the tribes. Thus, in the camp of Judah, the order is Judah, Issachar, Zevulun (Numbers 2:1–9.) Alternatively, hikriv, Moses brought him near [hikrivo], against Reuben’s will.
Another matter, “presented [his offering] – it is as though he presented his offering first. Why was it so? Because he was privileged to counsel the princes, the verse ascribes to him as though he presented his offering first. Abba Ḥanan says in the name of Rabbi Eliezer: Because he was privileged to counsel, he merited that understanding was granted to his tribe, as it is stated: “From the children of Issachar, possessors of understanding of the times” (I Chronicles 12:33), and it is stated: “Princes of Issachar were with Deborah” (Judges 5:15). Likewise, the verse speaks his praise as he sat on the tribunals in Egypt, as it is stated: “[Descendants of Issachar…] of Yashuv, the Yashuvite family” (Numbers 26:23–24), and yashuv is nothing other than courts,52Since Yashuv was in Egypt, and it is a term which refers to tribunals, we learn that there were tribunals in Egypt. as it is stated: “They will come to you as a people comes, and…will sit [veyeshvu] before you” (Ezekiel 33:31). “Jacob was a simple man, dwelling in tents” (Genesis 25:27),53“Tents” is expounded as a reference to the study halls of Shem and Ever. and it says: “And Issachar in your tents” (Deuteronomy 33:18).54This teaches that the tribe of Issachar studied a lot of Torah.
“He presented [hikriv] his offering…” (Numbers 7:19), Rabbi Pinḥas ben Yair said: Why did it add hikriv,55In the sacrifices of the other tribes, the word hikriv is not used. and it is lacking a yod? Rather, it was corresponding to the red heifer that they prepared on that day; that is why he added hikriv lacking a yod, establishing the word with four letters, corresponding to the four matters that the heifer required: Red, complete, unblemished, without having borne a yoke, just as it says: “They shall take to you a completely red heifer [in which there is no blemish, and upon which a yoke was not placed]” (Numbers 19:2).
“One silver dish” (Numbers 7:19), the prince of Issachar came and presented an offering in the name of the Torah, because they loved the Torah more than all the tribes did, as it is stated: “From the children of Issachar, possessors of understanding of the times, [to know what Israel should do; their leaders were two hundred, and all their brethren at their command]” (I Chronicles 12:33). What is “of the times”? Rabbi Tanḥuma said: To perform matters in a timely fashion. Rabbi Yosei says: For intercalations. “To know what Israel should do” – on what day they should observe the festivals. “Their leaders were two hundred” – these are the two hundred heads of the Sanhedrin that the tribe of Issachar produced. “And all their brethren at their command” – as others would agree to the halakha in accordance with their opinion. And it says: “[Issachar….] He bent his shoulder to bear” (Genesis 49:14–15), as they would bear the yoke of Torah. “And he became an indentured servant” (Genesis 49:15), as anyone who would err in halakha, they would ask the tribe of Issachar regarding it, and they would explain it to them.
“Silver dish,” corresponding to the Torah, that is called bread, as it is stated: “Come, partake of my bread” (Proverbs 9:5). And it is stated regarding the showbread: “You shall craft its dishes and its ladles” (Exodus 25:29), and we learned: The dishes were molds, as they would shape the showbread with molds.
“Its weight one hundred and thirty” (Numbers 7:19), go out and calculate twenty-four books of the written Torah, and eighty of mishna, that begin with mem: “From when [me’ematai] does one recite shema…” (Berakhot 1:1), and ends with mem: “The Lord will bless his people with peace” (Okatzin 3:12). Mem is forty and mem is forty, that is eighty;56Since the sum of the first letter in the Mishna and the last letter in the Mishna is 80, the number 80 represents the oral law. that is one hundred and four, the result of the tally of the written Torah and the Oral Torah. Alternatively, the beginnings of the six orders of Mishna, the tally of the first letters total eighty. Go out and calculate: mem of “me’ematai” (Berakhot 1:1), from the order of Zera’im; yod of “yetziot haShabbat” (Shabbat 1:1), from the order of Moed; ḥet of “ḥamesh esre nashim” (Yevamot 1:1), from the order of Nashim; alef of “arba’a avot nezikin” (Bava Kama 1:1), from the order of Yeshuot;57Also known as Nezikin. kaf of “kol hazevaḥim” from the order of Kodashim; alef of “avot hatuma” from the order of Teharot, equals eighty.58Mem – 40, + yod – 10, + ḥet – 8, + alef – 1, + kaf – 20, + alef – 1 = 80. From here [we see] that the written Torah and the Oral Torah total a tally of one hundred and four. The Torah was given after the twenty-six generations that were from Adam until Moses, by means of whom the Torah was given. That is one hundred and thirty; therefore, the weight of the dish was one hundred and thirty.
“He presented his offering: One silver dish, its weight one hundred and thirty; one silver basin of seventy shekels, in the sacred shekel; both of them full of high quality flour mixed with oil as a meal offering” (Numbers 7:19).
Why does it say in his regard: “Presented his offering [hikriv]”? (Numbers 7:18). It is because Reuben came and appealed. He said: ‘It is enough that Judah preceded me, just as he did on the journeys. I will present the [next] offering, in accordance with birth order.’ Moses reprimanded him and said to him: 'From the mouth of the Holy One blessed be He, it was stated to me: ‘Present the offerings [hakrev] in accordance with the journeys.’51Since the camp of Judah went first in the journeys, the tribes in that camp sacrificed first. Within each camp, the Torah orders the tribes. Thus, in the camp of Judah, the order is Judah, Issachar, Zevulun (Numbers 2:1–9.) Alternatively, hikriv, Moses brought him near [hikrivo], against Reuben’s will.
Another matter, “presented [his offering] – it is as though he presented his offering first. Why was it so? Because he was privileged to counsel the princes, the verse ascribes to him as though he presented his offering first. Abba Ḥanan says in the name of Rabbi Eliezer: Because he was privileged to counsel, he merited that understanding was granted to his tribe, as it is stated: “From the children of Issachar, possessors of understanding of the times” (I Chronicles 12:33), and it is stated: “Princes of Issachar were with Deborah” (Judges 5:15). Likewise, the verse speaks his praise as he sat on the tribunals in Egypt, as it is stated: “[Descendants of Issachar…] of Yashuv, the Yashuvite family” (Numbers 26:23–24), and yashuv is nothing other than courts,52Since Yashuv was in Egypt, and it is a term which refers to tribunals, we learn that there were tribunals in Egypt. as it is stated: “They will come to you as a people comes, and…will sit [veyeshvu] before you” (Ezekiel 33:31). “Jacob was a simple man, dwelling in tents” (Genesis 25:27),53“Tents” is expounded as a reference to the study halls of Shem and Ever. and it says: “And Issachar in your tents” (Deuteronomy 33:18).54This teaches that the tribe of Issachar studied a lot of Torah.
“He presented [hikriv] his offering…” (Numbers 7:19), Rabbi Pinḥas ben Yair said: Why did it add hikriv,55In the sacrifices of the other tribes, the word hikriv is not used. and it is lacking a yod? Rather, it was corresponding to the red heifer that they prepared on that day; that is why he added hikriv lacking a yod, establishing the word with four letters, corresponding to the four matters that the heifer required: Red, complete, unblemished, without having borne a yoke, just as it says: “They shall take to you a completely red heifer [in which there is no blemish, and upon which a yoke was not placed]” (Numbers 19:2).
“One silver dish” (Numbers 7:19), the prince of Issachar came and presented an offering in the name of the Torah, because they loved the Torah more than all the tribes did, as it is stated: “From the children of Issachar, possessors of understanding of the times, [to know what Israel should do; their leaders were two hundred, and all their brethren at their command]” (I Chronicles 12:33). What is “of the times”? Rabbi Tanḥuma said: To perform matters in a timely fashion. Rabbi Yosei says: For intercalations. “To know what Israel should do” – on what day they should observe the festivals. “Their leaders were two hundred” – these are the two hundred heads of the Sanhedrin that the tribe of Issachar produced. “And all their brethren at their command” – as others would agree to the halakha in accordance with their opinion. And it says: “[Issachar….] He bent his shoulder to bear” (Genesis 49:14–15), as they would bear the yoke of Torah. “And he became an indentured servant” (Genesis 49:15), as anyone who would err in halakha, they would ask the tribe of Issachar regarding it, and they would explain it to them.
“Silver dish,” corresponding to the Torah, that is called bread, as it is stated: “Come, partake of my bread” (Proverbs 9:5). And it is stated regarding the showbread: “You shall craft its dishes and its ladles” (Exodus 25:29), and we learned: The dishes were molds, as they would shape the showbread with molds.
“Its weight one hundred and thirty” (Numbers 7:19), go out and calculate twenty-four books of the written Torah, and eighty of mishna, that begin with mem: “From when [me’ematai] does one recite shema…” (Berakhot 1:1), and ends with mem: “The Lord will bless his people with peace” (Okatzin 3:12). Mem is forty and mem is forty, that is eighty;56Since the sum of the first letter in the Mishna and the last letter in the Mishna is 80, the number 80 represents the oral law. that is one hundred and four, the result of the tally of the written Torah and the Oral Torah. Alternatively, the beginnings of the six orders of Mishna, the tally of the first letters total eighty. Go out and calculate: mem of “me’ematai” (Berakhot 1:1), from the order of Zera’im; yod of “yetziot haShabbat” (Shabbat 1:1), from the order of Moed; ḥet of “ḥamesh esre nashim” (Yevamot 1:1), from the order of Nashim; alef of “arba’a avot nezikin” (Bava Kama 1:1), from the order of Yeshuot;57Also known as Nezikin. kaf of “kol hazevaḥim” from the order of Kodashim; alef of “avot hatuma” from the order of Teharot, equals eighty.58Mem – 40, + yod – 10, + ḥet – 8, + alef – 1, + kaf – 20, + alef – 1 = 80. From here [we see] that the written Torah and the Oral Torah total a tally of one hundred and four. The Torah was given after the twenty-six generations that were from Adam until Moses, by means of whom the Torah was given. That is one hundred and thirty; therefore, the weight of the dish was one hundred and thirty.
Bamidbar Rabbah
“On the third day, prince of the children of Zebulun, Eliav son of Ḥelon” (Numbers 7:24).
“On the third day, prince of the children of Zebulun, Eliav son of Ḥelon” – why, regarding all the princes, does it mention their tribe and then mentions their name, but regarding Judah and Issachar, it mentions the name of their princes first and then mentions their name? It is because Naḥshon was king, and Netanel was the king of Torah, just as it says: “Through me kings reign” (Proverbs 8:15), and in every circumstance, the king precedes his people, as it is stated: “Their king passed before them…” (Micah 2:13); “To enact justice for His servant" (I Kings 8:59); and then: “and justice for His people Israel, the matter of each day on its day” (I Kings 8:59).
Why, regarding all the princes, the title prince is written, but Naḥshon is not called “prince”? It is because he presented his offering first. Were he to come and be haughty regarding the other princes, saying: ‘I am king over them, as I presented my offering first,’ they could say to him: ‘You are nothing but a commoner, as all of them are called prince, and you were not called prince.’ This is to realize what is stated: “Anyone haughty of heart is an abomination to the Lord” (Proverbs 16:5). And it says: “Though the Lord is exalted, He sees the lowly; the haughty He knows from afar” (Psalms 138:6).
Why was Zebulun privileged to present his offering third? It is because he was fond of the Torah and was generous in dispensing his money to Issachar, so that the tribe of Issachar would not require a livelihood and would not be idle from engaging in Torah study. Therefore, Zebulun was privileged to be a partner in the Torah, and was Issachar’s associate, and that is why he presented his offering after him and after Judah, to realize what is stated: “A man’s giving expands him, and will guide him before the great” (Proverbs 18:16).
“His offering was one silver dish, its weight one hundred and thirty; one silver basin of seventy shekels, in the sacred shekel; both of them full of high quality flour mixed with oil as a meal offering” (Numbers 7:25).
“His offering was one silver dish” – the prince of Zebulun came and presented his offering due to his partnership with his brother Issachar, as Zebulun and Issachar were partners. Issachar would engage in Torah study and Zebulun would engage in commerce. Zebulun would toil and put food in Issachar’s mouth. This is why his offering was a “silver dish” – it was corresponding to the sea, that is shaped like a dish, and that was the portion of Zebulun, as it is stated: “Zebulun will dwell at the shore of seas” (Genesis 49:13). “One silver basin,” corresponding to the land that is shaped like an orb and that was the portion of Issachar, as it is stated: “He saw rest, that it was good, and the land, that it was pleasant” (Genesis 49:15).
“Its weight one hundred and thirty; one silver basin of seventy shekels,” that is two hundred, corresponding to the two hundred heads of the Sanhedrin who were from the tribe of Issachar, as it is stated: “[From the children of Issachar]…their leaders were two hundred” (I Chronicles 12:33). That is why it attributed the larger tally to Zebulun, because the one who causes the action is greater than the one who performs it, as had it not been for Zebulun, Issachar would have been unable to engage in Torah study, as he [Zebulun] would feed him and put food in his mouth.
Another matter, “dish,” corresponding to the food that he would feed him. “Basin,” corresponding to the wine that he would give him to drink. Why was it of silver? It is because he would also give him silver with which to perform all his needs, just as it says: “For laughter one prepares bread, wine brings joy the living, and silver answers everything” (Ecclesiastes 10:19).
“Both of them full of high quality flour [mixed with oil as a meal offering],” both Zebulun and Issachar would receive the reward for Torah together, and both would earn a livelihood together.
“One gold ladle, ten shekels, full of incense” (Numbers 7:26).
“One young bull, one ram, one lamb in its first year, as a burnt offering” (Numbers 7:27).
“One goat as a sin offering” (Numbers 7:28).
“And for the peace offering, two cattle, five rams, five goats, five sheep in their first year. This was the offering of Eliav son of Ḥelon” (Numbers 7:29).
“One…ladle [kaf]” (Numbers 7:26), this was Zebulun’s blessing that his father blessed him: “Zebulun will dwell at the shore [ḥof] of seas” (Genesis 49:13). And kaf is nothing other than ḥaf, just as it says: “Rivers will clap hands [khaf]” (Psalms 98:8).66This sound will be created by the river striking the shore; kaf equals khaf = shore. “Gold…ten shekels full of incense” (Numbers 7:26), corresponding to the ten words67In Hebrew. in Zebulun’s blessing. That is what is written: “Zebulun…at the shore of seas…” (Genesis 49:13). “And for the peace offering, two cattle” (Numbers 7:29), corresponding to the blessing that Moses blessed them: “Because they will be nourished by the bounty of the seas, and the hidden treasures of the sand” (Deuteronomy 33:19).
“One young bull…” (Numbers 7:27), it mentioned all the species for a burnt offering, besides the goat that was a sin offering, as we have not found a goat as a burnt offering. This is corresponding to the blessing of Moses who blessed them both regarding the offering, as it is stated: “Nations they will call to the mountain, there, they will sacrifice offerings of righteousness” (Deuteronomy 33:19). The burnt offering is “offerings of righteousness,” as it does not come due to a sin. Alternatively, it is because both Zebulun and Issachar were presenting their offering together, and the “offerings of righteousness" were the offerings, as, just as Zebulun had a share of the reward for his Torah, so, Issachar had a portion in Zebulun’s money.
“And for the peace offering, two cattle” (Numbers 7:29), corresponding to what Moses blessed them: “Because they will be nourished by the bounty of the seas” (Deuteronomy 33:19), two seas. “Five rams, five goats, five sheep in their first year” (Numbers 7:29), he sacrificed three species corresponding to the three matters regarding which Moses blessed them: “and the hidden treasures of the sand [usefunei temunei ḥol]” (Deutereonomy 33:19). Sefunei, this is snail;68From which the dye of tkhelet is derived. temunei, this is tuna; ḥol, this is white sand. Why were there five of each and every species? It is corresponding to the five words69In Hebrew. in the verse in which Moses blessed their partnership, as it is stated: “Rejoice, Zebulun, in your departure, and, Issachar, in your tents” (Deuteronomy 33:18).
“This was the offering of Eliav…” (Numbers 7:29), when the Holy One blessed be He saw that he presented his offering regarding the partnership in the Torah, He began lauding his offering: “This was the offering of Eliav,” to realize what is stated: "It is a tree of life for those who grasp it” (Proverbs 3:18); this is the tribe of Issachar, “and its supporters are happy” (Proverbs 3:18); this is the tribe of Zebulun.
“On the third day, prince of the children of Zebulun, Eliav son of Ḥelon” – why, regarding all the princes, does it mention their tribe and then mentions their name, but regarding Judah and Issachar, it mentions the name of their princes first and then mentions their name? It is because Naḥshon was king, and Netanel was the king of Torah, just as it says: “Through me kings reign” (Proverbs 8:15), and in every circumstance, the king precedes his people, as it is stated: “Their king passed before them…” (Micah 2:13); “To enact justice for His servant" (I Kings 8:59); and then: “and justice for His people Israel, the matter of each day on its day” (I Kings 8:59).
Why, regarding all the princes, the title prince is written, but Naḥshon is not called “prince”? It is because he presented his offering first. Were he to come and be haughty regarding the other princes, saying: ‘I am king over them, as I presented my offering first,’ they could say to him: ‘You are nothing but a commoner, as all of them are called prince, and you were not called prince.’ This is to realize what is stated: “Anyone haughty of heart is an abomination to the Lord” (Proverbs 16:5). And it says: “Though the Lord is exalted, He sees the lowly; the haughty He knows from afar” (Psalms 138:6).
Why was Zebulun privileged to present his offering third? It is because he was fond of the Torah and was generous in dispensing his money to Issachar, so that the tribe of Issachar would not require a livelihood and would not be idle from engaging in Torah study. Therefore, Zebulun was privileged to be a partner in the Torah, and was Issachar’s associate, and that is why he presented his offering after him and after Judah, to realize what is stated: “A man’s giving expands him, and will guide him before the great” (Proverbs 18:16).
“His offering was one silver dish, its weight one hundred and thirty; one silver basin of seventy shekels, in the sacred shekel; both of them full of high quality flour mixed with oil as a meal offering” (Numbers 7:25).
“His offering was one silver dish” – the prince of Zebulun came and presented his offering due to his partnership with his brother Issachar, as Zebulun and Issachar were partners. Issachar would engage in Torah study and Zebulun would engage in commerce. Zebulun would toil and put food in Issachar’s mouth. This is why his offering was a “silver dish” – it was corresponding to the sea, that is shaped like a dish, and that was the portion of Zebulun, as it is stated: “Zebulun will dwell at the shore of seas” (Genesis 49:13). “One silver basin,” corresponding to the land that is shaped like an orb and that was the portion of Issachar, as it is stated: “He saw rest, that it was good, and the land, that it was pleasant” (Genesis 49:15).
“Its weight one hundred and thirty; one silver basin of seventy shekels,” that is two hundred, corresponding to the two hundred heads of the Sanhedrin who were from the tribe of Issachar, as it is stated: “[From the children of Issachar]…their leaders were two hundred” (I Chronicles 12:33). That is why it attributed the larger tally to Zebulun, because the one who causes the action is greater than the one who performs it, as had it not been for Zebulun, Issachar would have been unable to engage in Torah study, as he [Zebulun] would feed him and put food in his mouth.
Another matter, “dish,” corresponding to the food that he would feed him. “Basin,” corresponding to the wine that he would give him to drink. Why was it of silver? It is because he would also give him silver with which to perform all his needs, just as it says: “For laughter one prepares bread, wine brings joy the living, and silver answers everything” (Ecclesiastes 10:19).
“Both of them full of high quality flour [mixed with oil as a meal offering],” both Zebulun and Issachar would receive the reward for Torah together, and both would earn a livelihood together.
“One gold ladle, ten shekels, full of incense” (Numbers 7:26).
“One young bull, one ram, one lamb in its first year, as a burnt offering” (Numbers 7:27).
“One goat as a sin offering” (Numbers 7:28).
“And for the peace offering, two cattle, five rams, five goats, five sheep in their first year. This was the offering of Eliav son of Ḥelon” (Numbers 7:29).
“One…ladle [kaf]” (Numbers 7:26), this was Zebulun’s blessing that his father blessed him: “Zebulun will dwell at the shore [ḥof] of seas” (Genesis 49:13). And kaf is nothing other than ḥaf, just as it says: “Rivers will clap hands [khaf]” (Psalms 98:8).66This sound will be created by the river striking the shore; kaf equals khaf = shore. “Gold…ten shekels full of incense” (Numbers 7:26), corresponding to the ten words67In Hebrew. in Zebulun’s blessing. That is what is written: “Zebulun…at the shore of seas…” (Genesis 49:13). “And for the peace offering, two cattle” (Numbers 7:29), corresponding to the blessing that Moses blessed them: “Because they will be nourished by the bounty of the seas, and the hidden treasures of the sand” (Deuteronomy 33:19).
“One young bull…” (Numbers 7:27), it mentioned all the species for a burnt offering, besides the goat that was a sin offering, as we have not found a goat as a burnt offering. This is corresponding to the blessing of Moses who blessed them both regarding the offering, as it is stated: “Nations they will call to the mountain, there, they will sacrifice offerings of righteousness” (Deuteronomy 33:19). The burnt offering is “offerings of righteousness,” as it does not come due to a sin. Alternatively, it is because both Zebulun and Issachar were presenting their offering together, and the “offerings of righteousness" were the offerings, as, just as Zebulun had a share of the reward for his Torah, so, Issachar had a portion in Zebulun’s money.
“And for the peace offering, two cattle” (Numbers 7:29), corresponding to what Moses blessed them: “Because they will be nourished by the bounty of the seas” (Deuteronomy 33:19), two seas. “Five rams, five goats, five sheep in their first year” (Numbers 7:29), he sacrificed three species corresponding to the three matters regarding which Moses blessed them: “and the hidden treasures of the sand [usefunei temunei ḥol]” (Deutereonomy 33:19). Sefunei, this is snail;68From which the dye of tkhelet is derived. temunei, this is tuna; ḥol, this is white sand. Why were there five of each and every species? It is corresponding to the five words69In Hebrew. in the verse in which Moses blessed their partnership, as it is stated: “Rejoice, Zebulun, in your departure, and, Issachar, in your tents” (Deuteronomy 33:18).
“This was the offering of Eliav…” (Numbers 7:29), when the Holy One blessed be He saw that he presented his offering regarding the partnership in the Torah, He began lauding his offering: “This was the offering of Eliav,” to realize what is stated: "It is a tree of life for those who grasp it” (Proverbs 3:18); this is the tribe of Issachar, “and its supporters are happy” (Proverbs 3:18); this is the tribe of Zebulun.