Cytowanie Komentarza do Wyjścia 26:6

A more rational approach to our line: we all know of many phenomena both above terrestrial earth and below in our world which exercise their influence on our lives in one form or another. It stands to reason that above all of these phenomena there is a hand which directs them all. The proliferation of the phenomena we witness must have its origin in a single force (compare Shaar Hayichud Chovot Halevavot chapter 5). Just like the number 1 is the first in a string of numbers, so Unity is the first (in terms of time) of a number of phenomena. Seeing that we are all witnesses to so many and different phenomena in the universe, it is quite clear that all of them must be derivatives of an original phenomenon, the Ultimate Cause. Even though the name “one” is applied to many things this description is misleading and inaccurate. It is a habit of people to use terms which, strictly speaking, apply to only one phenomenon and to describe other phenomena as possessing such characteristics. For instance, even in the Torah we find the Tabernacle referred to as אחד, “one,”(Exodus 26,6) although we all know that it was composed of many different parts. The reason the Torah described it on that occasion as “one,” was that all its constituent parts had been joined together and placed in their correct positions so that the finished product appeared to be “one.” Nonetheless the Tabernacle was subject to being dismantled and to no longer appear as a single unit.
We find that G’d told the prophet (Ezekiel 37,16) “take for yourself ‘one’ tree (or piece of wood).“ The expression אחד in that verse is a misnomer as there is only one phenomenon to which that definition can truly be applied, but the prophet describes it as such as he wants to portray a concept, i.e. the symbol of unity, something undivided. Although man is composed of 248 limbs the composite of these 248 limbs is called “one man.” Even the raw material man is made of is a composite of 4 elements; nonetheless we speak of “flesh” as if it consisted of a single raw material. All of the components of man will disintegrate at death proving that what was considered as “one” during his lifetime was in reality nothing of the kind. [Science may be defined as the search for the original single cause of the universe. Ed.]. Even amongst the celestial beings, the angels which are made of a uniform raw material and are therefore not subject to disintegration the term אחד cannot be applied in the true meaning of the word, seeing that each angel is only one of many such angels, so where is his uniqueness? The same applies to our souls. Although it is not an amalgam of elements such as our body, there are thousands of souls so how could a soul be truthfully described as אחד, truly unique? In other words, none of the phenomena in the universe can accurately be described as אחד with the exception of the Lord G’d Who is truly one of a kind in the absolute sense of the word. This is what the prophet Isaiah 40,25 meant when he said, paraphrasing G’d: ואל מי תדמיוני ואשוה, “to whom do you wish to compare Me, to whom can I be likened?”

מקבילת הללאת אשה אל אחתה — Be careful that you make the loops (place them on the curtains) to one measurement: that the spaces between one loop and the other be exactly the same, and further, as their measurement is on the one so shall it be on the other, so that when you lay out one section next to the other the loops of the one shall come exactly opposite those of the other. That is what is meant by the expression מקבילות, viz., “one opposite the other”. In the Targum the translation of נֶגֶד “opposite” is לקבל (hence the term מקבילות from קבל). The curtains were twenty-eight cubits long and four cubits wide, so when they joined five curtains together along their lengths it followed that their width was twenty cubits. The same was the case with the other section. The Tabernacle was thirty cubits in length from East to West, for it is said, (Exodus 36:23) “twenty boards for the south side (which was the long side of the Tabernacle) southward,” and the same is stated with reference to the north side; and as each board was one cubit and a half in breadth you have thirty cubits from East to West. The width of the Tabernacle from North to South was ten cubits, for it is said, (Exodus 36:27, 28) “and for the side of the dwelling westward he made six boards … and two boards … for the corners of the dwelling,” so you have ten cubits (this appears to give a breadth of twelve cubits, but each of the corner boards stood partly behind the thickness of the adjoining board that stood at right angles with it, and as the thickness was one cubit it took off a cubit on each side from the inside measurement). — I shall explain these verses each on its place. — They spread the curtains with their length over the breadth of the Tabernacle, whereby the ten middle cubits served as a roofing for the inside over the width of the Tabernacle and a cubit on each side of these ten cubits went to cover the thickness of the boards which were one cubit thick, so that there remained altogether sixteen cubits — eight hanging over on the north side and eight on the south side, covering the vertical boards which were ten cubits in height; consequently the two lowest cubits of the boards were left showing. The breadth of the curtains after having been joined together was forty cubits, twenty cubits for each section. Thirty cubits of these served as a roofing for the inside of the Tabernacle over its length, and one cubit for the thickness of the tops of the boards of the westside and one more cubit to cover the thickness of the columns in the east side — for there were no boards in the east side but there were five columns on the hooks of which the screen was spread and hung as a kind of curtain (cf. Exodus 27:10). Thus there remained eight cubits which hung on the back of the Tabernacle on the west side, leaving the two lowest cubits showing. This I have found in the Boraitha מ"ט מדות. But in Treatise Shabbat 98b it is stated that the curtains did not cover the thickness of the columns on the east side, and consequently there were nine cubits of the curtains hanging on the back of the Tabernacle. The text of this section suppports this view, since it says (v. 33) “and thou shalt hang up the partition veil under the catches;” for if it were as the Boraitha states the partition veil would have been distant from the catches one cubit to the West.

The answer is clear when we consider our verse wherein G'd is on record as showing Moses the blueprint of the Tabernacle. Accordingly, when Moses received the details about the measurements of both the Tabernacle and its furnishings, he was told first about the furnishings. Moses misunderstood that these details were not communicated to him as an instruction to construct them first but that they merely complemented the picture G'd had already shown him of the overall structure. In other words, verse ten is merely a continuation of verse nine in which the visual appearance of the Tabernacle was described. The reason that G'd mentioned the Tabernacle first in 26,6, i.e. "the Tabernacle and its furnishings," is to reflect Moses' incredulity when he had first heard that G'd would take up residence in the Tabernacle. By telling Moses of the measurements of the Tabernacle, G'd emphasized the smallness of the structure. This verse also informs us of the fact that when G'd showed Moses the blueprint of the Tabernacle He showed him the furnishings at the same time. Perhaps the Torah also intended to convey the idea that there was no need for these furnishings to be of a large size.