וּמִֽי־הָאִ֞ישׁ אֲשֶׁר־נָטַ֥ע כֶּ֙רֶם֙ וְלֹ֣א חִלְּל֔וֹ יֵלֵ֖ךְ וְיָשֹׁ֣ב לְבֵית֑וֹ פֶּן־יָמוּת֙ בַּמִּלְחָמָ֔ה וְאִ֥ישׁ אַחֵ֖ר יְחַלְּלֶֽנּוּ׃
Albo jeżeli jest który, co zasadził winnicę, a nie użytkował z niej, niechaj pójdzie, a wróci do domu swego, by nie zginął na wojnie, a kto inny z niej użytkował.
Jerusalem Talmud Sotah
HALAKHAH: “Who planted”. Not only who planted; if he bought, inherited, or it was given to him as a gift, from where? The verse says, “the man,” “who is the man”155The same argument as in Note 133, applied to v. 6, not v. 5. Parallels in Babli 43b; Sifry Deut. 195.. From where about him who planted a vineyard but also who planted five fruit trees153An orchard, whose rules of redemption are identical to those of a vineyard; cf. Ma‘aser Šeni 5:4., even from five different kinds? The verse says, “who planted”, in any circumstance. I could think that one who planted four fruit trees or five futile trees156The definition of a futile tree is in dispute (Mishnah Kilaim 6:6); the majority opinion holds that a tree is futile if and only if its fruits are not edible. may return? The verse says, “a vineyard.” Since a vineyard is special in that it is composed of five vines157The minimal size of a legal vineyard, cf. Kilaim 4:3, Note 38. The vineyard must be planted in orderly rows; in an orchard, the trees must grow at least four and at most √250 (= 15.8) cubits apart; cf. Ševi‘it 1:2, Notes 18,22., this excludes the case where there are not five vines158Or fruit trees..