Wyjścia 6:8 Odniesienia do Talmudu: Jerusalem Talmud Bava Batra

וְהֵבֵאתִ֤י אֶתְכֶם֙ אֶל־הָאָ֔רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֤ר נָשָׂ֙אתִי֙ אֶת־יָדִ֔י לָתֵ֣ת אֹתָ֔הּ לְאַבְרָהָ֥ם לְיִצְחָ֖ק וּֽלְיַעֲקֹ֑ב וְנָתַתִּ֨י אֹתָ֥הּ לָכֶ֛ם מוֹרָשָׁ֖ה אֲנִ֥י יְהוָֽה׃

A wyprowadzę was do owej ziemi, co podniosłem rękę Moję, abym ją dał Abrahamowi, Ic'hakowi i Jakóbowi, a oddam ją wam w dziedzictwo: Ja Wiekuisty!" 

Jerusalem Talmud Bava Batra

43Babli 117a; a different version Tanḥuma Pineḥas 5 = Num. rabba21(9). Rebbi Joshiah said, the Land was distributed to those who left Egypt, as it is written: “By the names of the fathers’ tribes they shall inherit.44Num. 26:55, referring to the census Num. 1.” Then why does the verse say: “To those45Num. 26:53. The verse asserts that the distribution of land has to be based on the census of Num. 26.”? Only because of women46The daughters of Zelophehad. and because of children47As will be explained later, Notes 63 ff.. Rebbi Joḥanan48One has to read with E and the Babli “Jonathan” as contemporary of R. Joshiah. said, the Land was distributed to those who entered the Land49Each of the persons counted in the second census became a candidate for a piece of land similar in value to that of any other., as it was said, “to those it shall be distributed45Num. 26:53. The verse asserts that the distribution of land has to be based on the census of Num. 26..” Then why does the verse say: “By the names of the fathers’ tribes”? This inheritance was different from all other inheritances in the world. For in all other inheritances in the world the living inherit from the dead but here the dead from the living50While the number of lots was determined by the second census, the final allotment was made through the first census as explained by Rebbi in the section after the next.. It was stated51117a/b (R. Simeon ben Eleazar), slightly differently Tosephta 7:8 (R. Eliezer ben Jacob).: Rebbi Joshua ben Qorha said, the Land was distributed to those who left Egypt and to those who stood in the plains of Moab. How is that? If one was both of those who left Egypt and those who stood in the plains of Moab, he took two parts52In the Tosephta: It was given to those who left Egypt and distributed to those who stood in the plains of Moab.. Of those who left Egypt but not of those who stood in the plains of Moab, or of those who stood in the plains of Moab but not of those who left Egypt, he took one part. The daughters of Zelophehad took five parts: their part with those who left Egypt54The decree that those who left Egypt could not enter the Land applied neither to women nor to Levites. and their part with those who stood in the plains of Moab. And because he55Zelophehad. Even though the rule that the firstborn takes a double portion does not apply to expected acquisitions of the estate, here it is considered already acquired because of God’s promise in Egypt (Ex. 6:8). was a firstborn they took two parts. And their father’s part among his brothers. Rebbi Yose said, the Mishnah says otherwise56They only received three parts. The Mishnah can only be interpreted following R. Joshiah.. But “giving you shall give them inheritance among their father’s brothers.42Num. 27:7–8.” That is what is written: “Ten measures fell to Manasseh57Jos. 17:5. It is explained in Jos.17:2 that Gilead and Bashan were given to the seven male clans of Manasseh, and the Cisjordan territory to the five female clans. If together this made ten districts, it follows that the five females in the plains of Moab, while representing only one person of the Exodus, received 3/10 of the entire territory of Manasseh.”.
Zapytaj rabinaBookmarkShareCopy