Midrash sa Mga Bilang 30:3: Midrash Tanchuma, Eikhah Rabbah, Bamidbar Rabbah & Sifrei Bamidbar

אִישׁ֩ כִּֽי־יִדֹּ֨ר נֶ֜דֶר לַֽיהוָ֗ה אֽוֹ־הִשָּׁ֤בַע שְׁבֻעָה֙ לֶאְסֹ֤ר אִסָּר֙ עַל־נַפְשׁ֔וֹ לֹ֥א יַחֵ֖ל דְּבָר֑וֹ כְּכָל־הַיֹּצֵ֥א מִפִּ֖יו יַעֲשֶֽׂה׃

Kapag ang isang lalaki ay nanata ng isang panata sa Walang-Hanggan, o sumumpa ng isang sumpa upang magbawal ng isang pagbabawal sa kanyang sarili, hindi niya dapat lapastanganin ang kanyang salita; ayon sa lahat ng lumabas sa kanyang bibig ay gagawin niya.

Midrash Tanchuma

(Numb. 30:3:) “When someone makes a vow (neder) to the Lord.” Let our master instruct us: How are konamot (i.e., vows of abstinence) and vows (nedarim)? Thus have our masters taught (in Ned. 2:1): [If one makes] a konam (i.e., a vow of absitinence) [that he will not sleep, that he will not speak; [if he utters a konam to his wife] “that I will not have marital relations with you,” such a one is liable to [the injunction] (in Numb. 30:3), “he shall not break his word.” [If he swears] an oath (shevu'ah)] that he will not sleep, that he will not walk, he is forbidden [to do so].1Cf. Ned. 2:2-5; Ned. 13b, 14b-15a; 20a; yNed. 2:2-5 (37b-6); above, Lev. 1:16. Oaths (shevu'ot) carry more weight than vows (nedarim); and vows, than oaths. How so? [if one makes] a konam not to make a sukkah, not to take up a lulab, not to put on phylacteries, in the case of vows (nedarim) it is forbidden to put them on or to make them, even though they are commandments (of the Torah); but in the case of oaths (shevu'ot) it is permitted, because one does not swear to transgress against the commandments. The Holy One, blessed be He, said to Israel, “Be circumspect with your vows (nedarim) and do not break them; for all who break vows (nedarim) end up in being faithless in oaths (shevu'ot).” And the one who is faithless in oaths is denying the Holy One, blessed be He through it and will never have forgiveness, as stated (in Exod. 20:7 = Deut. 5:11), “for the Lord will not exonerate [one who takes His name in vain].” [Yet] it is also written (in Jer. 4:2), “And you shall swear, ‘As the Lord lives,’ [in truth, in justice, and in righteousness].” The Holy One, blessed be He, said to Israel, “Do not think that you have permission to swear in My name even in truth.2Numb. R. 22:1. You are not entitled to swear by My name unless you possess all the following attributes (of Deut. 10:20), “The Lord your God you shall fear, Him you shall serve, to Him you shall hold fast, [and by Him you shall swear]”: That you should be like those three who were called God-fearing, Abraham, Job, and Joseph: Abraham of whom it is written (in Gen. 22:12), “For now I know that you fear [God].” Concerning Job it is written (in Job 1:1), “the man was blameless [and upright, one who feared God].” Concerning Joseph it is written (in Gen. 42:18), “for I fear God.” Ergo (in Deut. 10:20), “The Lord your God you shall fear.” (Deut. 10:20, cont.:) “Him you shall serve.” [You do so,] if you turn [all] your attention to the Torah, fulfill [its] commandments and have no other work (abodah). It therefore is stated (ibid.), “Him you shall serve (rt.: 'bd).” (Deut. 10:20, cont.:) “To Him you shall hold fast.” Can one hold fast to the Divine Presence? Moreover, has it not already been stated (in Deut. 4:24), “For the Lord your God is a consuming fire?” It is simply [being stated with reference to] anyone marrying off his daughter to a scholar who reads [Scripture] and recites [Mishnah], that he engage in commerce3Gk.: pragmateia. for him and have him benefit from his assets.4Ket. 111b; cf. Sot. 14a. It is with reference to [such a] one that it is stated (in Deut. 10:20), “to him you shall hold fast.”
If you have all these [attributes] you may swear; if not, you are not entitled to swear. There is a story about King [Jannai], that he had two thousand towns and they all were destroyed because of a true oath. (Numbers 30:17:) “Between a man and his wife, between a father and his daughter.” Just like a man only annuls vows of self-affliction and matters between him and her, so too a father only annuls with regards to self-affliction and what is between him and her.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Eikhah Rabbah

“The elders of the daughter of Zion sit on the ground, are silent. They have placed dust on their heads, have girded themselves with sackcloth. The virgins of Jerusalem have lowered their heads to the ground” (Lamentations 2:10).
“The elders of the daughter of Zion sit on the ground, are silent.” Rabbi Elazar said: Let the portion of vows not be insignificant in your eyes, as it is on account of the portion of vows that the Great Sanhedrin of Zedekiah were killed. When Yekhonya was exiled, King Nebuchadnezzar appointed him106Zedekiah. over five kings. That is what is written: “Send to the king of Edom, to the king of Moav, to the king of the children of Ammon, to the king of Tyre and to the king of Sidon, in the hand of the messengers who come to Jerusalem to Zedekiah, king of Judah” (Jeremiah 27:3). He would enter and exit before him without permission.107Zedekiah had unfettered access to Nebuchadnezzar. One day, he entered before him and saw that he was ripping the flesh of a hare and eating it raw. [Nebuchadnezzar] said to him: ‘Take an oath to me that you will not publicize this about me,’ and he took an oath to him. On what did he administer the oath to [Zedekiah]? Rabbi Yosei ben Rabbi Ḥanina said: On the inner altar. The five kings were sitting and maligning Nebuchadnezzar before Zedekiah and saying to him: ‘The kingdom is not suitable for Nebuchadnezzar, but rather it is suitable for you, as you are from the offspring of David.’ He, too, maligned Nebuchadnezzar and said: ‘I saw that he was ripping the flesh of a hare and eating it.’ Immediately, they sent [a message] to the king, saying: ‘This Jew who enters and exits before you without permission said about you: I saw that Nebuchadnezzar was ripping the flesh of a hare and eating it.’ That is what is written: “Zedekiah rebelled against the king of Babylon” (II Kings 24:20).
Immediately, he108Nebuchadnezzar. came and settled in Daphne of Antioch and the Great Sanhedrin went to greet him. When he saw that they were all men of noble form, he issued a command and had seats of honor brought for them, and he seated them. He said to them: ‘Teach me the Torah.’ Immediately they began reading each and every portion and translating it before him. When they reached the portion of vows: “A man who takes a vow” (Numbers 30:3), he said to them: ‘If he wishes to renege on it, can he or can he not do so?’ They said to him: ‘He can go to a Sage and [the Sage] can nullify his vow for him.’ He said to them: ‘It seems to me that you nullified for Zedekiah the oath that he took to me.’ Immediately, he decreed and had them placed down on the ground. That is what is written: “The elders of the daughter of Zion sit on the ground, are silent.” “They have placed dust [on their heads],” they began mentioning the merit of Abraham, as it is written: “I am dust and ashes” (Genesis 18:27). “Have girded themselves with sackcloth,” they began mentioning the merit of Jacob, as it is written: “He placed sackcloth on his loins” (Genesis 37:34).109The Sages began to pray to God for mercy in the merit of Abraham and Jacob, both of whom took oaths and were careful to fulfill them (Etz Yosef; see Genesis 14:22, 28:20). What did they do to them? They tied their hair to horses’ tails and had them run from Jerusalem to Lod. That is what is written: “The virgins of Jerusalem have lowered their heads to the ground.”110They did so in mourning for the Sages. Alternatively, the Sages are alluded to with the term virgins because of their purity.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bamidbar Rabbah

“Speak to the children of Israel…” (Numbers 6:2), it is taught: “Speak to the children of Israel” – Israel take a vow of naziriteship but the idolaters do not take a vow of naziriteship. “And say to them” (Numbers 6:2), to include the slaves. “A man,” but not a minor, “or a woman,” to render the women like the men.68The laws of naziriteship apply to women just as they apply to men. That is what we learned: The Samaritans69There are versions where this reads, the gentiles. Some say that it comes to teach that the legal status of the Samaritans is equal to that of gentiles. do not have naziriteship, women and slaves have naziriteship. There is a stringency regarding women more than slaves, as one compels his slave70He can compel him not to observe his naziriteship as long as he is in servitude. and does not compel his wife.71If he did not nullify his wife's vow on the day that he heard of the vow, he cannot compel her not to observe her naziriteship. There is a stringency regarding slaves more than women, as he nullifies the vows of his wife but he does not nullify the vow of his slave. If he nullified for his wife, he has nullified for perpetuity. If he nullified72If he did not allow his slave to observe his naziriteship. for his slave, when he is liberated, he completes his naziriteship. If he passed from his presence,73If the slave fled. Rabbi Meir says: He may not drink74This is to encourage him to return to his master so he can resume drinking wine. and Rabbi Yosei says: He may drink.75This is so he will not suffer from deprivation which could affect his fitness to serve his master when he returns.
“When…will articulate [ki yafli],” one who is able to distinguish [lehaflot]. From here they said: One who is able to distinguish [mufla] and will soon reach majority, his vows take effect. Alternatively, “when…will articulate” – when one articulates his vow, [this means] to the exclusion of one who ruminates [on becoming a nazir] in their heart.
“To take the vow of a nazirite” – why was this portion stated?76A person can take any vow. Why is there a special portion relating to the vow of the nazirite. It is because it says: “If a man takes a vow to the Lord, or takes [an oath]…” (Numbers 30:3); if one took a vow for one day, it is prohibited for one day,77If one takes a vow to abstain from something for one day, the vow obligates him for one day. for two, it is prohibited for two; from the species regarding which he took a vow, from that species he is prohibited. Do I hear that the same is true regarding naziriteship as well? This is why this portion is stated; whether he took a vow for one day or for one hour, it is prohibited for thirty days to drink wine, to become impure by means of a dead person, and it is prohibited to shave.
“To take the vow of a nazirite,” why is “vow” written here?78It could have just said: “To abstain for the Lord.” It is to render naziriteship like vows. Just as regarding vows one violates: “One shall not profane” (Numbers 30:3) and “you shall not delay” (Deuteronomy 23:22), the same is true regarding naziriteship. And just as regarding vows, the father nullifies the vows of his daughter and the husband violates the vows of his wife, the same is true regarding naziriteship.
“A nazirite, to abstain [nazir lehazir],” it is to render substitutes for naziriteship like naziriteship.79Even if someone does not say explicitly that they will be a nazir, but says instead a substitute phrase, it obligates them. One who says: Behold I am a nazik, naziaḥ, paziaḥ, he is a nazirite.
Lehazir, it is, perhaps that he can render others nazirites [sheyazir]? The verse states: “Nazirite” – he can render himself a nazirite but he cannot render others a nazirite. However, there is a halakha transmitted to Moses at Sinai that a man renders his son a nazirite, but a woman does not render her son a nazirite.
Rabbi Yishmael says: Nazir lehazir; [we learn] from here that a person can establish naziriteship during his naziriteship.80See Jerusalem Talmud, Nedarim 1:1.
“To abstain for the Lord.” Shimon HaTzadik said: In all my days, I had never eaten the guilt offering of a nazirite. One time, one from the south came and I saw him, that he was ruddy, with beautiful eyes, and a fine appearance, and his locks were curls, arranged in piles. I said to him: ‘What did you see that led you to destroy this fine hair?’81A nazirite shaves all of his hair when he completes his naziriteship. See Numbers 6:18. He whispered to me: ‘Rabbi, I was a shepherd in my city and I went to fill the vessel with water from the spring. I saw my reflection in the water and my evil inclination quickly overcame me and sought to eliminate me from the world. I said to it: Wicked one, why are you proud of something that is not yours? It is of dust, worms, and maggots. I will consecrate you to Heaven and shave you for the sake of Heaven.’ I lowered my head and kissed him and I said to him: ‘May there be many like you in Israel, who perform the will of the Omnipresent.’ In your regard, the verse said: “To abstain for the Lord.”
Rabbi Mona asked: Why would Shimon HaTzadik not eat the guilt offering of a nazirite? If you say it is because the nazirite is a sinner because he afflicted himself by abstaining from wine, did Shimon HaTzadik not partake of a sin offering of fats, or a sin offering of blood?82A sin offering brought by somebody who ate forbidden fats, or blood. Shimon Hatzadik believed that people take a vow of naziriteship in anger. Since they vow in anger, they will ultimately come to regret.83When they become impure by means of a corpse and are required to begin the naziriteship anew, they regret having taken the vow at all. Since he regrets, his offerings become tantamount to slaughtering non-consecrated animals in the Temple courtyard. However, since this one took a vow after consideration, his mouth and his heart were in concert.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy