Mga Sanggunian sa Talmud para sa Mga Bilang 35:23: Jerusalem Talmud Makkot, Jerusalem Talmud Megillah, Makkot & Bava Kamma

א֣וֹ בְכָל־אֶ֜בֶן אֲשֶׁר־יָמ֥וּת בָּהּ֙ בְּלֹ֣א רְא֔וֹת וַיַּפֵּ֥ל עָלָ֖יו וַיָּמֹ֑ת וְהוּא֙ לֹא־אוֹיֵ֣ב ל֔וֹ וְלֹ֥א מְבַקֵּ֖שׁ רָעָתֽוֹ׃

o kung naihulog niya sa kanya ang anumang batong maaaring ikamatay nang hindi niya siya nakikita, at namatay ang tinamaan, gayong hindi niya siya kaaway at hindi niya hinahangad na siya ay mapahamak,

Jerusalem Talmud Makkot

MISHNAH: The father is exiled for his son, and the son for the father29If the father kills his son unintentionally. If he kills him during a punishment for educational reasons he is not liable for any penalty (Note 18); if he kills him otherwise intentionally he must be prosecuted for murder and the perpetrator is barred from the cities of refuge even if no conviction is possible, e.g., for lack of eye witnesses or warning. Similarly, a son is exiled for the unintentional killing of his father.. Everybody30Adult Israel, Samaritan, or circumcised slave of a Jewish master. is exiled for an Israel, and an Israel for everybody except a sojourner. A sojourner is exiled for a sojourner31A Gentile observing the Noahide commandments..
A blind person is not exiled, the words of Rebbi Jehudah; Rebbi Meïr says, he is exiled32They disagree about the interpretation of Num. 35:23.. Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah33In the later editions of the Babli: R. Yose, by actions of editors who held that R. Simeon, contemporary of R. Jehudah, could not react to an opinion of the latter’s son. says, the hater is executed for he is as if notorious34He does not need warning and in his opinion cannot claim that he did it unintentionally.. Rebbi Simeon says, there is a hater who is exiled and one who is not exiled. In any case where one can say that he killed intentionally, he is not exiled; unintentionally, he is exiled.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Makkot

“And the blind person.” Rebbi Abba said, who stated “the blind person”? Rebbi Jehudah, for Rebbi Jehudah frees him from all obligations of the Torah39Soṭah 2:6 (Note 201), Babli Bava qamma 87a., as we have stated there40Megillah Mishnah 4:7.: “Rebbi Jehudah said, anyone who never saw light in his life may not cover the Shemaˋ.41He cannot lead the congregation in the recital of the benedictions before and after the recitation of the Shemaˋ since they start with a praise of God for the creation of the celestial shining bodies. The majority opinion holds that while a blind person cannot see the sun’s light, he profits from it since other people who can see can help him during daylight.” Therefore, if he saw once he may cover. And both of them explained the same verse, without seeing42Num. 35:23, part of the definition of involuntary homicide. Babli 9b, Sifry Num. 160. As the Babli explains, the double restriction mentioned by the verse, unintentional, without seeing, has to be read as an inclusion.. Rebbi Meïr says, to include the blind person. Rebbi Jehudah says, excluding the blind person. 43A parallel to this paragraph is in Megillah 4:7. One has to read “Jehudah” for Meïr, as in Megillah, since only for R. Jehudah are two opinions recorded. Also “there” means Makkot, “here” Megillah. The argument of Rebbi Meïr seems inverted. There he says, excluding, but here he says, to include. Rebbi Ḥanina the son of Rebbi Hillel said, the Mishnah is about one sitting in a dark house. So we are saying, “one sitting in a dark house may not cover the Shemaˋ.44In his explanation, R. Jehudah does not exclude the blind person but one born and raised in a cave who never saw daylight.” But here, without seeing, to include the blind person. How do the rabbis read without seeing? To include one who smites in the night45He is included in the list of the exiled together with the blind person..
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Megillah

HALAKHAH: 144This paragraph is a reformulation of a paragraph in Makkot 2:7 Notes 41–44. There, we have stated, “A blind person is not exiled, the words of Rebbi Jehudah; Rebbi Meïr says, he is exiled.” And both of them explained the same verse, without seeing145Num. 35:23.. Rebbi Jehudah says, to include the blind person. Rebbi Meïr says, excluding the blind person. And here we have stated, “a person who never saw light does not spread out the Shema`143Since the first benediction preceding the Shema` is a praise of God for the creation of light..” Therefore if he saw he spreads. Rebbi Ḥaggai asked before Rebbi Yose, is the argument of Rebbi Jehudah inverted? There he says, excluding, but here he says, to include. Rebbi Ḥanania the son of Rebbi Hillel said, the Mishnah is about one sitting in a dark house. So we are saying, “one sitting in a dark house may not spread the Shema`.” But here, without seeing, to include the blind person.
Magtanong sa isang RabbiBookmarkShareCopy