Mga Sanggunian sa Talmud para sa Mga Bilang 35:31: Jerusalem Talmud Terumot, Makkot & Bava Kamma

Rebbi Immi the Babylonian²¹He is R. Immi (Ammi), the head of the Tiberian academy after R. Joḥanan. His statement is quoted in the Babli (Ketubot 35a) by Abbai, one generation after R. Immi. in the name of the rabbis from there: The reason of Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish is “criminal, criminal.” “Criminal” is mentioned in capital cases²²Num. 35:31: “Do not take weregild for the life of a human who is a criminal condemned to death.”, “criminal” is mentioned in cases of flogging²³Deut. 25:2: “If the criminal is condemned to flogging, …”. Just as for the criminal in capital cases there is no monetary fine, so for the criminal mentioned in flogging cases there is no monetary fine.

GEMARA: From where is this known [that lashes can not be divided]? Abaye says, The word "rasha" (wicked person) is said by the laws of lashes (Deuteronomy 25, 2) and the word "rasha" is said by the laws of the death penalty (Numbers 35, 31). Just as there is no half of a death penalty, so too there is no half of lashes.

From where do we learn this rule [that zomemim aren't liable if the victim had no verdict] by lashes? The Torah uses a gezariah shava of Rasha Rasha