מדרש אויף במדבר 11:18

Regarding the matter itself,⁹The midrash sometimes uses this expression when introducing an exposition that appears elsewhere. The following appears also in Tanḥuma (Warsaw), Lekh Lekha, 10 (Etz Yosef). Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai said: The burnt offering [ha’ola] comes only for rumination of the heart.¹⁰Burnt offerings atone for sinful thoughts. Rabbi Levi said: It is a categorical verse: “What arises [ha’ola] in your thoughts will not be that which you say: [We will be like the nations…to serve wood and stone]” (Ezekiel 20:32).
From whom do you derive this? From the sons of Job. Initially, “his sons would go and make a feast [in the house of each one on his day, and they would send and invite their three sisters to eat and to drink with them. It was when the cycle of their days of feasting was completed that Job would send and sanctify them and he would rise early in the morning and offer burnt offerings according to the number of them all, for Job would say: Perhaps my sons have sinned and have blasphemed God in their hearts]” (Job 1:4–5). Rabbi Meir says: As it is the way of the sons of kings to call their brothers and sisters to join them in a feast.¹¹These feasts were held as an expression of family unity and affinity. Rabbi Tanḥum ben Rabbi Ḥiyya said: They went to attend to them, as they had betrothed women for them.¹²The feasts were celebrations to mark the event of a son of Job betrothing a wife, and the other sons would attend in order to celebrate the occasion. That is what is written: “It was when the cycle of the days of their feasting was completed that Job would send and sanctify them [vaykadeshem]” (Job 1:5). According to the opinion of Rabbi Tanḥum ben Rabbi Ḥiyya, who said that they betrothed [kideshu] women for them, they attended to them and went.¹³The children of Job would participate in the celebration and then go on their way. These feasts were not regular occurrences. According to the opinion of Rabbi Meir, who said as it is the way of the sons of kings to call their brothers and sisters to join them in a feast, it is as it says: “To the people say: Prepare yourselves [hitkadeshu] [tomorrow and you will eat meat]” (Numbers 11:18).¹⁴The feasts were not in celebration of a special and unusual occasion but rather were more regular occurrences.
“He would rise early in the morning and offer [burnt offerings corresponding to the number of them all]” (Job 1:5). Rabbi Yudan bar Ḥilfai raised a dilemma: [Corresponding to] the number of days, the number of sons and daughters, or the number of offerings in the Torah?¹⁵This question remains unresolved. When it says: “For Job would say: Perhaps my sons have sinned and blasphemed,” that indicates that the burnt offering comes only for [sinful] rumination of the heart.
Rabbi Aḥa in the name of Rabbi Ḥanina bar Pappa: In order that Israel would not say: ‘In the past we would sacrifice offerings and engage in their study; now that there are no offerings, must we engage in their study?’ the Holy One blessed be He said: ‘Since you engage in their study, I consider it for you as though you are sacrificing them.’ Rabbi Huna said two: All of the exiles will be ingathered only by virtue of Mishna. What is the source? “Even as they pay tribute [yitnu]¹⁶Yitnu is expounded to mean matnitin or Mishna. Thus, the verse implies that the exiles will be gathered back to the Land of Israel because of the study of Mishna. to the nations, now I will gather them” (Hosea 8:10). Rabbi Huna said another: “For from the rising of the sun to its setting, My name is great among the nations and in every place offerings are presented to My name, [and pure meal offerings]” (Malachi 1:11). Are there pure meal offerings, handfuls, and burning in Babylon?¹⁷The process of the meal offering included a priest taking a handful of the offering and burning it on the altar. Rather, what is this? This is Mishna. The Holy One blessed be He said: ‘Since you are engaging in the study of Mishna, it is as though you are sacrificing an offering.’
Shmuel said: “And if they are ashamed of all that they have done, [make known to them the form of the House]” (Ezekiel 43:11). Was there a form of the House at that point?¹⁸The house referred to is the Temple, which was in ruins at the time of that prophecy. Rather, the Holy One blessed be He said: Since you are engaged in it, it is as though you are building it.’ Rabbi Asi said: Why does one begin [teaching] children from the book of Leviticus and one does not begin with Genesis? It is because the children are pure and the offerings are pure, let the pure come and engage in the pure.

(Numb. 11:16), “Gather Me seventy men [from the elders of Israel].” When the Holy One, blessed be He, said to Moses, “Gather Me seventy men,” Moses said, “How shall I manage to get [them] from all the tribes?⁴⁸Numb. R. 15:19; Sifre to Numb. 11:24-26 (95). If I get five each from every tribe, they will not add up to the number seventy. There will [only] be sixty. And if we get six each from every tribe, they will add up to the number seventy-two. But if we get five from one tribe and six from another, I shall be imposing jealousy among the tribes.” What did Moses do? R. Judah says, “He took seventy pieces of paper⁴⁹Petaqim; cf. Gk.: pittikia (“notes”). and wrote ‘elder’ on them. Then he took another (seventy) [two] blank pieces of paper, mixed them up, put them in an urn,⁵⁰Gk.: kalpis. and said to them, ‘Come and take your pieces of paper.’ Whoever took a paper with ‘elder’ written on it knew that he had been appointed an elder. Whoever came up with a blank paper in his hand knew that he had not been appointed an elder.” R. Nehemiah said to him, “There would still have been a controversy, since [a loser] could have said to him, ‘Where is a paper with "elder" written on it? If it had been there, it would have come up in my hand.’” Therefore, how did he manage for them? R. Nehemiah said, “He took seventy-two pieces of paper and wrote ‘elder’ on them plus [seventy-]two other blank pieces of paper. Then he mixed them up and put them in the urn. He said to them, ‘Come and take your papers.’ If a paper with ‘elder’ written on it came up in [a person's] hand he knew that he had been appointed an elder, but if a blank one came up in his hand he knew that he had not been appointed. Then the officer-in-charge would say to him, ‘Look there is another paper there with “elder" written upon it. If you had been worthy of being appointed, [a paper with "elder"] would have come up in your hand.’” When [Moses had followed this procedure] the elders were appointed. Eldad and Medad were there, but they excluded themselves. They said, “We are not worthy to be in the number of the elders.” Now because they excluded themselves, they were found [to have become] superior to the elders in five respects. The elders only prophesied for the morrow as stated (in Numb. 11:18), “And you shall say to the people, ‘Purify yourselves for the morrow,’” but these men prophesied what was going to happen at the end of forty years as stated (in Numb. 11:26), “But two men had remained in the camp; [the name of the one was Eldad and the name of the other was Medad…; and they were…] prophesying in the camp.” But what were they prophesying? Some say [they were prophesying] about the downfall of Gog and Magog, while others say they were prophesying that Moses would die and Joshua would bring Israel into the Land. You yourself know that they so prophesied, since it is what Joshua told Moshe (in vs. 28), “Then Joshua ben Nun, Moses' attendant from his youth, answered.” And it is written (in vs. 27), “But a lad ran and told Moses.” And who was it? It was Moses' son, Gershom. The elders did not enter the land, but these did enter the land. Eldad is [so listed] (in Numb. 34:21) [as] Elidad ben Chislon. Medad is [so listed] (in Numb. 34:24) [as] Kemuel ben Shiphtan. The elders were not designated by their names, but these were designated by their names. The elders had their prophecy cease, but these did not have their prophecy cease. It is so stated (of the seventy in Numb. 11:25), “they prophesied but did not continue.” In the case of the elders, their prophecy was from what belonged to Moses, even as the Scripture has said (in Numb. 11:17), “and I will set aside some of the spirit which is upon you and put it on them”; but these [two] had their prophecy from that which belonged to the Holy One, blessed be He, as stated (in Numb. 11:26), “and the spirit rested upon them.”
Now if you say, “Since the elders had their prophecy from what belonged to Moses, might it not have lessened his prophecy somewhat?” [The answer is] no. To what may Moses be compared? To a lamp which was lit and⁵¹Sifre to Numb. 11:17 (93). everyone lights up from it; yet its light is in no way diminished. So also in the case of Moses. Although the prophets took of his prophecy, the prophecy of Moses was in no way diminished. [It is so stated] (in Deut. 34:10), “And never again did there arise in Israel a prophet like Moses.”

Another matter, “Gather to Me seventy men” – when the Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: “Gather to Me seventy men” – Moses said: ‘What shall I do? If I bring five from each and every tribe, they will not total a sum of seventy, they will total sixty. If I bring six from this tribe and five from that tribe, I will introduce jealousy between one tribe and another.’ What did he do? He took seventy-two notes and wrote “elder” [on seventy of] them, and [took] an additional two blank notes, and mixed them in a receptacle. He said: ‘Come and take your note.’ One for whom a note on which “elder” was written entered his hand, would know that he was appointed to be an elder. If a blank entered his hand, he would know that he was not appointed. The appointee says to him: ‘There is one note there on which elder is written, had you been worthy to be appointed it would have entered your hand.’ When he did so, the elders were appointed.
Eldad and Meidad were there, and they excluded themselves: ‘We are not worthy to be included in the appointment of the elders.’ Because they excluded themselves, they were found superior to the elders in five respects. The elders prophesied only the next day, as it is stated: “To the people say: Prepare yourselves for tomorrow” (Numbers 11:18), but these prophesied regarding what will transpire at the end of forty years, as it is stated: “Two men remained in the camp, [one named Eldad and the other Medad…and they prophesied in the camp]” (Numbers 11:26). What were they prophesying? Some say: It was regarding the downfall of Gog. Some say: [That] Moses would die and Joshua would lead Israel into the Land. Know that Joshua says to Moses: “Joshua son of Nun spoke up…[my lord Moses, restrain them¹⁹From prophesying.]” (Numbers 11:28). “The lad ran and told Moses” (Numbers 11:27). Who was this? It was Gershom son of Moses. The elders did not enter the Land, but Eldad and Meidad [entered]. Eldad is Elidad son of Kislon (Numbers 34:21) and Meidad is Kemuel son of Shiftan (Numbers 34:24). The elders, their names were not articulated. The elders, their prophecy ceased, as it was from Moses, as it is stated: “I will draw from the spirit that is upon you” (Numbers 11:17). However, these, their prophetic spirit was from the Holy One blessed be He: “The spirit rested upon them” (Numbers 11:26).
If you say: The elders that their prophecy was from Moses, perhaps [as a consequence] there was something lacking from Moses’s prophecy. No. To what is the matter comparable? It is to a candle that was kindled. They kindled several candles from it, but the light of its flame was not diminished. Moses, too, had nothing lacking from his [prophecy], as it is stated: “There has not arisen another prophet in Israel like Moses” (Deuteronomy 34:10).