出埃及記 21:9 米德拉什:Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael

וְאִם־לִבְנ֖וֹ יִֽיעָדֶ֑נָּה כְּמִשְׁפַּ֥ט הַבָּנ֖וֹת יַעֲשֶׂה־לָּֽהּ׃

主人若選定她給自己的兒子為妻,就要按照以色列女子為妻應得的規矩待她。

Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael

"After he (the father) has been faithless ("bagdah") to her" (by selling her,) by degrading her and not treating her as a Jewish daughter, he, too, is not permitted to retain her (i.e., to sell her a second time). These are the words of R. Yonathan b. Avtalmos. "bagdah" here connotes deceit" as in (Malachi 2:11) "bagdah Yehudah" and (Jeremiah 5:11) "for the house of Israel bagod bagdu against Me."
請教拉比BookmarkShareCopy

Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael

(Exodus, Ibid. 9) "And if to his son he designate her (as a wife)": He designates her to his son, but not to his brother. For it would follow (that he does designate her to his brother), viz.: If he designates his son, who does not take his place through yibum (levirate marriage), how much more so, his brother, who does take his place through yibum! — No, this may be true of his son, who takes his place vis-à-vis (reversion to his father of) a (field of) holding (on the Yovel), (as opposed to his brother, who does not.) It is, therefore, written "And if to his son he designate her" — to his son and not to his brother.
請教拉比BookmarkShareCopy

Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael

R. Yonathan says: Scripture (in "he shall not withhold") speaks of a Jewess (in general). You say it speaks of a Jewess, but perhaps it speaks of the Hebrew maid-servant. — (No, for [9]) "according to the ordinance of the daughters shall he provide for her" already speaks of the Hebrew maid-servant. How, then, am I to understand "If another he take for himself"? As applying to a Jewess (in general).
請教拉比BookmarkShareCopy

Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael

僅限進階版會員使用