列王紀下 8:6的塔木德參照：Jerusalem Talmud Bava Batra

Rav said, there can be no claim of undisturbed possession from a fugitive, nor one made from one country to another. Samuel said, there can be a claim of undisturbed possession from a fugitive, and a claim of undisturbed possession made from one country to another⁴⁸As the Babli points out, 38b, this statement by Rav contradicts the earlier one that the rule of the Mishnah only applies to emergency situations. Samuel’s position is clear; he holds that a protest can be made before any court which will sign a dated statement which may be used before the court at the place of the disputed real estate without time limit. For the position of Rav, two explanations are given there. One is that he holds that a protest must be made in person and that his statement about the Mishnah was to explain the thinking of the Tanna, not his own. Another is that he also holds that a protest can be submitted in any court but that such an appearance in a distant court can be expected only from a fugitive because of nonpayment of taxes or other debt but not from a person accused of a capital crime. Also, the choice of the word “country” instead of “province” refers to a country outside the Roman Empire, such as Persia or India, from where any communication might be difficult or impossible.. Rav Naḥman bar Rav Isaac^48*The identity of this Amora is not clear. The fourth generation Amora Rav Naḥman bar Isaac never is quoted as Rav Naḥman bar Rav Isaac. said, a verse supports what Samuel said: “The king gave her an adjutant,⁴⁹2K. 8:6. Since the Ṣhunamite woman needed the king’s intervention after an absence of 7 years in the Land of the Philistines it follows that she could get no relief in the regular courts since a claim of undisturbed possession could be made against a proprietor living in another country.” etc.