Kommentar zu Kohelet 7:23

“All this I have probed with wisdom,”⁵⁴Below, verse 23. refers to the verses below (other texts: and not) and [to the verses] above.

“All this I attempted with wisdom; I said: I will become wise, but it is far from me” (Ecclesiastes 7:23).
“All this I attempted with wisdom.” It is written: “God granted wisdom to Solomon, [great discernment, and breadth of understanding like the sand on the seashore]” (I Kings 5:9). The Rabbis and Rabbi Levi, the Rabbis say: “Like the sand” – what is “like the sand”? He was granted wisdom corresponding to all of Israel.¹²⁴Israel is compared to the sand on the seashore; see Genesis 22:17. Rabbi Levi said: Just as this sand is a boundary for the sea, so, too, wisdom was a boundary for Solomon.¹²⁵It prevented him from sinning. The parable says: If you lack knowledge, what have you acquired? If you have acquired wisdom, what are you lacking?
It is written: “Solomon's wisdom surpassed the wisdom of all the people of the East and all the wisdom of Egypt” (I Kings 5:10). What was the wisdom of the people of the East? They were well-versed in astronomy, performed sorcery with birds, and were expert in augury. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel said: Regarding three matters I praise the people of the East: They do not kiss on the mouth, but rather on the hand; they do not bite [pieces of food from a larger piece] with their mouth but cut with a knife; and they seek counsel only in a spacious area, as they consult only in the field.¹²⁶This is to ensure that there are no eavesdroppers.
What was the wisdom of the Egyptians? You find that when Solomon sought to build the Temple, he sent to Pharaoh Nekho and said: ‘Send me craftsmen [and I will pay] their wage, as I seek to build the Temple.’ What did he [Pharaoh] do? He assembled all his astrologers, and they envisioned people who were destined to die during that year and he sent them to him. When they came to Solomon, he envisioned with the divine spirit that they were destined to die during that year. He gave them shrouds and sent them [back] to [Pharaoh Nekho], and said to him: ‘If you did not have shrouds for the needs of your dead, here they are with their shrouds; arise and bury them.’
“He was wiser than any man [ha’adam]” (I Kings 5:11) – than Adam the first man. What was the wisdom of Adam the first man? You find that when the Holy One blessed be He sought to create Adam the first man, He consulted with the ministering angels, and He said to them: “Let us make man” (Genesis 1:26). They said to him: ‘Master of the universe, “what is man that You remember him?”’ (Psalms 8:5). He said to them: ‘The man I seek to create, his wisdom is greater than yours.’ What did He do? He gathered all the animals, beasts, and birds, and stood them before them [the angels], and said to them: ‘Give them names.’ They remained [silent] and did not know [what to say]. He went to Adam and said to him: ‘What [should] the names of these [creatures be]?’ [Adam] said: ‘Master of the universe, it is fitting to call this one ox, this one lion, this one horse, this one camel, this one eagle,’ and so forth for all of them. [God] said to him: ‘What is your name?’ He said before Him: ‘Adam, because I was created from the ground [adama].’ [God said:] ‘And I, what is My name?’ He said before Him: ‘You are my Lord [adonai], because You are the Lord [adon] over all Your creations’ – that is what is written: “I am the Lord, it is My name” (Isaiah 42:8), it is My name that I was called by Adam the first man. It is My name that I stipulated between Me and Myself. It is My name that I stipulated between Myself and My creations and My ministering angels.
“[For he was wiser than all men: than Eitan the Ezrahite, and Heman, and Kalkol, and Darda, the sons of Maḥol]” (I Kings 5:11). “Than Eitan the Ezrahite,” this is Abraham, as it is written: “A contemplation of Eitan the Ezrahite” (Psalms 89:1).¹²⁷Rabbinic tradition identifies Eitan the Ezrahite of Psalms as Abraham; see Bava Batra 15a. “And Heman,” this is Moses, as it is stated: “In all My house he is trusted [ne’eman]” (Numbers 12:7). “And Kalkol,” this is Joseph, as it is written: “Joseph provided [vaykhalkel]” (Genesis 47:12). The Egyptians said: ‘Is this slave not king over us due only to his wisdom?’ They took seventy notes¹²⁸Each note was written in a different language. and cast them before him and he would read each of them in its language. Moreover, he would speak in the sacred tongue, which they did not know, with which they were not familiar, and which they could not understand. So, it says: “He established it as a precept for Joseph [when he went out over Egypt; I learned a language I had not known]” (Psalms 81:6). “And Darda,” (I Kings 5:11), this is the generation [dor] of the wilderness, which was entirely knowledge [de’a]. “Sons of Maḥol,” (I Kings 5:11), these are the Israelites, whom the Holy One blessed be He forgave [maḥal] for the sin of the [Golden] Calf.

I have probed with wisdom. With the [wisdom of the] Torah.

“He spoke three thousand proverbs” (I Kings 5:12). Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani said: We reviewed the Bible in its entirety, and we found that Solomon composed only approximately eight hundred verses [of proverbs], and you say three thousand? Rather, it teaches that each and every verse that Solomon composed has two or three meanings. The Rabbis say: On each and every verse there are three thousand parables, and there are one thousand and five meanings for each and every parable, as it is written: “And his poems [shiro] were [one thousand and five]” (I Kings 5:12), the remainder [shiyuro] for each parable¹²⁹Layers of meaning that were not explicitly stated. was one thousand and five.

I said I will be wise. To know the wisdom [of Torah].⁵⁵Alternatively, if I consider myself a wise person [=אמרתי אחכמה], then it is beyond doubt that wisdom is very distant from me [=והיא רחוקה ממני]. (Rabbi of Kotzk)

“He spoke of the trees, [from the cedar which is in Lebanon to the hyssop that emerges from the wall; he spoke of the animal, of the bird, of the creeping creatures, and of the fish]” (I Kings 5:13). Is it possible for a person to speak of the trees? It is rather that Solomon said: ‘Why is the leper purified by the tallest of the tall and the lowest of the low, with a cedar tree and a hyssop? It is because when a person elevates himself like a cedar, he is afflicted with leprosy, and when he lowers himself and demeans himself like the hyssop, which is low, he will ultimately be healed.’
Likewise, why is it that an animal is permitted with two signs¹³⁰When an animal is slaughtered, the knife must penetrate the majority of both the gullet and the windpipe. and a bird is permitted with one sign?¹³¹When a bird is slaughtered, the knife must penetrate the majority of either the gullet or the windpipe. It is because the animal is created from the dry land, and the bird from the sea, as bar Kappara said: The bird was created from the mud.¹³²Mud is a combination of dry land and water. Thus, a bird’s status is between that of an animal, which was created from the earth, and a fish, created from water. Similarly, its slaughter requires the middle ground between that of an animal, which requires the penetration of two passageways, and that of a fish, which does not require ritual slaughter at all. Rabbi Avin said in the name of Rabbi Shmuel Kapodkiya, that the legs of a chicken are similar to the scales of a fish.
“And of the creeping creatures,” he said: Why is one who traps or wounds [one of the] eight swarming creatures [mentioned] in the Torah on Shabbat liable,¹³³Liable for desecrating the Shabbat, which carries with it the death penalty or karet for intentional violation, and a sin-offering for unwitting violation. while for all the rest of the swarming creatures, repugnant creatures and creeping creatures, one is exempt? It is because they have skins. “And of the fish,” he said: Why is it that all animals, beasts, and birds require slaughter, and fish do not require slaughter? It is from this verse: “Will flocks and herds be slaughtered?” (Numbers 11:22), while regarding fish, only gathering is written.¹³⁴The entire verse states: “Will flocks and herds be slaughtered for them and suffice for them? If all the fish of the sea would be gathered for them, would it suffice for them?”
Yaakov, from the village of Nevurya, issued a ruling in Tyre that fish require slaughtering. Rabbi Ḥagai heard and he sent to bring him. [Rabbi Ḥagai] said to him: ‘From where did you [derive] your ruling?’ He said to [Rabbi Ḥagai]: ‘From here, as it is written: “Let the water swarm with swarms of the living and let birds fly” (Genesis 1:20). Just as a bird requires slaughter, so too, fish require slaughter.’ [Rabbi Ḥagai] said: ‘Let him be flogged forty times.’ [Yaakov] said: ‘Shall a person who states a matter from the Torah be flogged?’ [Rabbi Ḥagai] said to him: ‘You did not issue a correct ruling.’ He said to [Rabbi Ḥagai]: “From where [do you derive this]?’ [Rabbi Ḥagai] said to him: ‘From here: “Will flocks and herds be slaughtered for them [and suffice for them? If all the fish of the sea would be gathered for them, would it suffice for them?]” (Numbers 11:22) – these with slaughter and these with gathering.’ [Yaakov] said: ‘Flog your floggings, as it is good for internalization.’

But [it proved to be] far beyond me. And what is this?⁵⁶Alternatively, the reason why the Torah proved to be far, i.e., I am unable to comprehend it, is because of me [=ממני] and not, God forbid, that the Torah is lacking. (Amtachas Binyomin)

Yaakov, from the village of Nevurya, issued a ruling in Tyre, that the son of a gentile woman is circumcised on Shabbat. Rabbi Ḥagai heard and he sent to bring him. [Rabbi Ḥagai] said to him: ‘From where did you [derive] your ruling?’ He said to [Rabbi Ḥagai]: ‘From here, as it is written: “They declared their lineage [vayityaldu] after their families” (Numbers 1:18), and it is written: “[He that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you…] he that is born [yelid] in the house and purchased with money [from any foreigner” (Genesis 17:12).’ [Rabbi Ḥagai] said: ‘Let him be flogged forty times.’ He said to [Rabbi Ḥagai]: ‘Shall a person who states a matter from the Torah be flogged?’ [Rabbi Ḥagai] said: ‘You did not issue a correct ruling.’ He said to [Rabbi Ḥagai]: ‘From where [do you derive this]?’ [Rabbi Ḥagai said:] ‘Bend over¹³⁵Bend over the flogging pole. and listen.’ He [continued and] said to him: ‘If a son of gentiles comes to you and says: ‘I wish to become a Jew,’ provided that he will be circumcised on the day of Shabbat or on the day of Yom Kippur, does one desecrate Shabbat on his behalf or not? You must say: One does not desecrate, because one desecrates Shabbat and Yom Kippur only on behalf of the son of an Israelite man and an Israelite woman.’ He said to [Rabbi Ḥagai]: ‘From where [is this derived]?’ [Rabbi Ḥagai] said to him: ‘Bend over, [it is derived from the following verse:] “To send away all the wives and those born from them”’ (Ezra 10:3). He said to [Rabbi Ḥagai]: ‘Are you flogging me based on a verse in Writings?’ [Rabbi Ḥagai] said to him: ‘It is as it is written: “And let it be done in accordance with the Torah”’ (Ezra 10:3). He said to [Rabbi Ḥagai]: ‘From what [source in the] Torah?’ [Rabbi Ḥagai said:] ‘It is as it says: “You shall not marry them” (Deuteronomy 7:3). Why? “For they will cause your child to turn away” (Deuteronomy 7:4) – a son who emerges from an Israelite woman is called your son, but a son who emerges from a gentile woman or from a maidservant is not called your son, but rather, her son.’ He said to him:¹³⁶Yaakov of Nevurya said this to Rabbi Ḥagai. Alternatively, Rabbi Ḥagai said this to the individual whose job it was to administer the flogging. ‘Flog your floggings, as it is good for internalization.’
Solomon said: On all these I stood and examined, but the portion of the red heifer I analyzed. When I was toiling in it and expounding and investigating it: “I said: I will become wise, but it is far from me” (Ecclesiastes 7:23).