Midrasch zu Ijow 23:13

“To a mare in Pharaoh's chariots I have likened you, my love” (Song of Songs 1:9).
“To a mare in Pharaoh's chariots,” Rabbi Papis expounded: “He is of one mind, and who can respond to Him?” (Job 23:13). He alone judges all creatures, and one may not challenge the words of the One who spoke and the world came into being. Rabbi Akiva said to him: ‘Enough, Papis, one may not challenge the words of the One who spoke and the world came into being, because everything is true and everything is just,’ as it is written: “I saw the Lord sitting on a high and exalted throne” (Isaiah 6:1). Rabbi Simon said: It is a throne that distinguishes between death and life. “And all the host of the heavens attending Him on His right and on His left” (I Kings 22:19). Is there left On High? But is it not all right, as it it is stated: “Your right, Lord, is glorious in power; Your right, Lord, smashes the enemy” (Exodus 15:6)? Why, then, does the verse state: “On His right and on His left”? Rather, these incline to the right and these incline to the left; these advocate exoneration and these advocate condemnation. Rabbi Yoḥanan in the name of Rabbi Aḥa cites it from here: “The truth of the matter and a great host” (Daniel 10:1). One arrives at the truth when it is accomplished with a great host, as it is written: “The Lord God is truth” (Jeremiah 10:10). What is truth? Rabbi Aivun said: That He is the living God and King of the universe.
Rabbi Elazar said: Anywhere that it is stated: “And the Lord,” it is He and His court. The paradigm of them all [is the verse]: “And the Lord has spoken evil in your regard” (I Kings 22:23).²³⁶This verse is the culmination of a passage in which the prophet Mikhaihu, speaking to King Ahab, begins: “I saw the Lord sitting on His throne, and all the host of heaven standing by Him on His right and on His left” (I Kings 22:19). That is the paradigm of them all. How, then, does Rabbi Elazar interpret that verse of Rabbi Papis: “He is of one mind, and who can respond to Him”? Rather, He alone seals the verdict for all creatures and no being seals it with Him. What is the seal of the Holy One blessed be He? Rabbi Beivai said in the name of Rabbi Reuven: Truth, as it is stated: “However, I will tell you what is inscribed in the writ of truth” (Daniel 10:21). If truth, why inscribed, and if inscribed, why truth?²³⁷The implication of “truth” is that it is indelible, while the implication of “inscribed” is that it can be erased. Rather, until the ruling is signed, it is “inscribed”; once the ruling is signed, it is “truth.”
Reish Lakish said: Why is it “truth [emet]”? Alef is the first of the letters, mem is in the middle, and tav is at their end; this is to say: “I am first and I am last and aside from Me there is no God” (Isaiah 44:6). “I am first,” as I did not receive My kingdom from another. “And I am last,” as I will not transfer it to another, as there is none [other] in the world. “And aside from Me there is no God,” as there is no second to Me.

(Exod. 4:18:) THEN MOSES WENT AND RETURNED UNTO HIS FATHER-IN-LAW JETHER (i.e., Jethro). This text is related (to Job 23:13): BUT HE HAS ONENESS; SO WHO CAN TURN HIM? AND WHATEVER HIS SOUL DESIRES, HE DOES. R. Papias interpreted <the verse as follows >: Because he stands alone in his world, there is no one to interfere with him. Whatever he wants to do, he does, as stated (in Job 23:13): AND WHATEVER HIS SOUL DESIRES, HE DOES.⁶⁶Tanh., Exod. 1:18; Tanh. (Buber), Gen. 4:21; B Mekhilta de Rabbi Ishmael, Beshallah, 7; Cant. R. 1:9:1; cf. Exod. R. 4:3; cf. also Gen. R. 21:5. R. Aqiva said to him: Enough from you, Papias! One does not so interpret. What is the meaning of (Job 23:13): BUT HE HAS ONENESS; SO WHO CAN TURN HIM? Just like the one who petitions <here> below, so is one who petitions above. Where is it shown? Where it is stated (in Dan. 4:14 [17]): THE RULING IS BY THE DECREE OF THE WATCHERS, AND THE PETITION {BY} THE WORD OF THE HOLY ONES < SO THAT THE LIVING MAY KNOW THAT THE MOST HIGH IS SOVEREIGN OVER THE HUMAN REALM >…. Just as one argues halakhah <here> below, so it is above. So everything <proceeds> with justice. Thus it is stated (in Dan. 10:21): BUT I WILL TELL YOU WHAT IS INSCRIBED IN THE RECORD OF TRUTH; <FOR NO ONE IS STANDING BY ME AGAINST THESE (i.e., against Persia and Greece) EXCEPT YOUR PRINCE MICHAEL>. When the Holy One argues a case, he says: how did the judgment of such a person come out? And they say: It came out this way. Then the Holy One agrees with them. From whom have you learned <this custom >? From Micaiah. See what is written (in I Kings 22:19): BUT {MICAIAH} SAID: HEAR, THEREFORE, THE WORD OF THE LORD: I SAW THE LORD SITTING UPON HIS THRONE, AND ALL THE HEAVENLY HOST WAS STANDING BY HIM TO HIS RIGHT AND TO HIS LEFT. Is there a left above, as it says: TO HIS RIGHT AND TO HIS LEFT? It is simply that the ones on the right tip the balance toward the side of merit, and the ones on the left tip the balance toward the side of guilt. Ergo, everything <proceeds> with justice. So why is it that (in Job 23:13) HE HAS ONENESS; SO WHO CAN TURN HIM? Because he alone in his world has knowledge of his creatures.

Another interpretation (of Job 23:13): BUT HE HAS ONENESS; SO WHO CAN TURN HIM? <AND WHATEVER HIS SOUL DESIRES, HE DOES>. Because he stands alone in his world, no one refutes his words. Look at how much Jonah resisted going on his mission; yet it is stated (in Jonah 3:3): THEN JONAH AROSE AND WENT UNTO NINEVEH IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LORD'S COMMAND…. <When> Jeremiah said to the Holy One (in Jer. 1:6): I AM <BUT> A LAD, the Holy One said to him (in vs. 7): DO NOT SAY: I AM <BUT> A LAD; FOR, WHEREVER I SEND YOU, YOU SHALL GO…. He did not budge until he went on the mission of the Holy One. Ergo (in Job 23:13): AND WHATEVER HIS SOUL DESIRES, HE DOES. In the case of Moses also: When the Holy One said to him (in Exod. 3:10): COME, I WILL SEND YOU UNTO PHARAOH, Moses said (in Exod. 4:13): PLEASE MAKE SOMEONE ELSE YOUR AGENT. The Holy One had said to him: I am saying to you: COME, I WILL SEND YOU; but you say: PLEASE MAKE SOMEONE ELSE YOUR AGENT. Let us see whose <will> prevails. He did not budge until he went (on his mission), as stated (in Exod. 4:18): THEN MOSES WENT (on his mission) AND (afterwards) RETURNED UNTO HIS FATHER-IN-LAW JETHER (i.e., Jethro).⁶⁷The midrash interprets the verse as referring to two separate acts, the fulfilling of the divine mission as represented by the verb WENT and the return to Jether. Exod. R. 4:4 explains further that apart from this interpretation the word WENT would be superfluous.