Midrasch zu Jeschijahu 24:2

R. Ulla said: "Jerusalem would not have been destroyed but for the sin of being devoid of shame, as it is said (Jer. 6, 15.) They should have been ashamed, because they had committed an abomination; but they neither felt the least shame," etc. R. Isaac said: "Jerusalem would not have been destroyed but for the sin of making no distinction between great and small, as it is said (Is. 24, 2.) And it shall be with the people as with the priest, etc; immediately following which, is written, Empty, emptied out shall be the land." R. Amram, the son of R. Simon b. Abba, in the name of R. Simon b. Abba, who spoke in the name of R. Chanina, said: "Jerusalem would not have been destroyed but for their sin in failing to admonish one another, as it is written (Lam. 1, 6.) Her princes are become like harts that have found no pasture, i.e., as the harts in a herd walk, one's head between the other's rump, so Israel of that generation pressed their faces into the ground and did not dare to admonish each other." R. Juda said: "Jerusalem would not have been destroyed but for the sin of spurning scholars, as it is written (II Chr. 36, 16.) But they had mocked at the messengers of God, and despised His words, and scorned His prophets, until the fury of the Lord arose against His people, till there was no remedy." What is meant by Till there was no remedy? R. Juda, in the name of Rab, said: "It means this: 'Whoever spurns a scholar will find no remedy for his affliction.'" R. Juda, in the name of Rab, said: "What is meant by the passage (Ps. 105, 15.) Touch not my anointed, and do my prophets no harm, i.e., Touch not my anointed, refers to the school children," and Do my prophets no harm, refers to the scholars." Resh Lakish in the name of R. Juda the Nasi said: "The world would not be sustained if it were not for the breath of [praise coming forth from] the school children." "What about mine and thine?" said R. Papa unto Abaye. Whereupon Abaye replied: "The breath [of praise] which comes forth from one who might have sinned is not like the breath [of praise] that is uttered by one who is incapable of committing sin." Resh Lakish in the name of R. Juda the Nasi said further: "School children should not be withheld from school even by reason of the building of the Temple." Resh Lakish said to R. Juda, the Nasi: "Thus have I a tradition from my ancestors, and according to others, from your ancestors: 'Every town which has no school for children will eventually be destroyed.'" Rabina said [the tradition was]: "It shall be placed under the ban [until a school is provided]." And Raba said further: "Jerusalem would not have been destroyed were it not because men of faith ceased to exist, as it is said (Jer. 5, 1.) Roam about through the streets of Jerusalem and see now, and notice, and search in its broad places: and if ye can find one man, if there be one that executeth justice, that searcheth for truth, then I shall pardon it." Is it so? Has not R. Ketina said: "Even at the period of Jerusalem's downfall (of her moral decay) men of faith did not fail her, as it is said (Is. 3, 6.) When a man will seize his brother in the house of his father [saying] thou hast a nice garment, thou shalt be our ruler, (Fol. 120a) i.e., things which cause people to hide themselves under cover, like a garment, seem to be well under thy hand (thou art a scholar). And let this stumbling be under thy hand, (Ib.) i.e., things of which a man never gets at the true sense unless he first stumbles over it (the Torah) let this be under thy hand; (Yisa) He will lift up his hand on this day, saying I will not he a chief. etc., (Ib.) i.e., the words, He will lift up his hand, apply to nothing else but to swearing and so it says (Ex. 20, 7.) Thou shalt not lift up thy hand to swear in the name of God. I will be a chief, (Ib.) i.e., I will not be confined in the house of study. And in my house is neither bread nor clothing, i.e., I master neither Scripture nor Mishnah nor Gemara." [Hence it shows that they were truthful]. Perhaps in that case, it is different, because if he would say 'I did learn,' people might ask him, 'Tell us what you know?' [Therefore he is bound to tell the truth]. But he might say that he learned and forgot it. [Thus no one will be able to contradict him]. Why does he say that he never knew a thing? [We must therefore, say that they really were trustworthy]. This is not difficult to explain. Rab deals with trustworthy men in business affairs and R. Ketina deals with men faithful in affairs of learning.