Midrasch zu Zephaniah 2:17

When R. Huna came to the above cited passage, he used to weep and say: "That a slave, whose master exhorts him to come to see him should be debarred from seeing him, as it is written (Is. 1, 12) When you come to appear in My presence, who had required this of your hands to tread My courts?" When he came to the following verse (Deut. 27, 7) And thou shalt slay peace-offerings, and eat there. R. Huna would weep and say: "A slave who is invited to eat from his master's table, shall be debarred from seeing him, as it is said (Is. 1, 11) Or what serveth Me the multitude of your sacrifices?" When R. Elasar came to this verse (Gen. 45, 3) And his brothers could not answer him, because they were terrified at his presence, he wept and said: "If this is the result of a human being's admonition, how much the more will it be of the Holy One, praised be He!" R. Elazar cried also when he came to the verse (I Sam. 28, 15) And Samuel said to Saul: 'Why hast thou disquieted me, to bring me up?' If Samuel the prophet was afraid of the judgment, how much the more ought we be afraid of it! How shall this be interpreted? It is written (Ib. ib. 12) And the woman said unto Saul: 'Divine being have I seen (Olim) ascending out of the earth.' Olim is plural. Hence they were two. One was Samuel and the other was Moses whom Samuel brought, for he said: "Perhaps I am called before the Divine Judgment, so he said to Moses come and testify in my behalf that there is not a thing written in thy Torah which I did not fulfill." When he came to the following verse (Lam. 3, 29) That he put his mouth in the dust, perhaps there still is hope. R. Ami used to cry. He said: "After so much had been done, nevertheless it is said, perhaps." R. Ami used to cry when he came to the following verse (Zeph. 2, 3) See ye the Lord, all ye meek of the earth, who have fulfilled the ordinances; seek righteousness, seek meekness; perhaps ye will be protected on the day of the Lord's anger. He said: "After so much will have been done, still it will be perhaps." When he came to the following passage, R. Assi used to cry (Amos 5, 15) Hate the evil, and love the good, and establish justice firmly in the gate; perhaps the Lord, the God of hosts shall be gracious unto the remnants of Joseph. He said: "After so much will have been done, it will still be perhaps."

“The adversary extended his hand over all her delights; for she saw the nations entering her Sanctuary, whom You had commanded that they should not enter Your assembly” (Lamentations 1:10).
“The adversary extended his hand.” You find that when the enemies entered the Temple, Amonites and Moavites entered with them. Everyone was running to plunder silver and gold, and the Amonites and Moavites were running to plunder the Torah, in order to remove “An Amonite and Moavite shall not enter the assembly of the Lord” (Deuteronomy 23:4). Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon [said] in the name of Rabbi Levi ben Perata: This is analogous to a conflagration that was ignited in a king’s palace. Everyone was running to plunder the silver and the gold while a slave ran to plunder his writ of servitude. So too, when the enemies entered the Temple, Amonites and Moavites entered with them. Everyone was running to plunder silver and gold, and the Amonites and Moavites were running to plunder the Torah, in order to remove “An Amonite and Moavite shall not enter the assembly of the Lord.”
Abraham bestowed four good things upon Lot. That is what is written: “Abram went, as the Lord had spoken to him, and Lot went with him” (Genesis 12:4). And it says: “Lot, too, who was going with Abram [had sheep, cattle and tents]” (Genesis 13:5). And it says: “He returned all the property, [and also his brother Lot and his property he returned]” (Genesis 14:16). And it says: “It was when God destroyed the cities of the plain [God remembered Abraham, and He sent Lot from the midst of the upheaval]” (Genesis 19:29). Correspondingly, they should have repaid them with goodness;¹⁴³Lot’s descendants, the nations of Amon and Moav, should have been kind to Abraham’s descendants. however, they performed acts of wickedness. That is what is written: “He sent messengers to Bilam…now, please go and curse for me…. The elders of Moav and the elders of Midian went…” (Numbers 22:5–7). “He gathered to him the children of Amon and Amalek, [and he went and smote Israel]” (Judges 3:13).¹⁴⁴The verse is stated regarding Eglon, king of Moav. “It was thereafter, the children of Moav, and the children of Amon, and with them some Amonites, came against Yehoshafat” (II Chronicles 20:1). And this: “The adversary extended his hand...”
Correspondingly, their sins are written in four places. “An Amonite and Moavite [shall not enter the assembly of the Lord]…because they did not greet you with bread and with water…” (Deuteronomy 23:4–5). “My people, remember now what Balak king of Moav devised…” (Micah 6:5). “Because they did not greet the children of Israel with bread and with water, and hired Bilam against them, to curse them” (Nehemiah 13:2). “He sent and summoned Bilam son of Beor to curse you” (Joshua 24:9).
Correspondingly, four prophets stood and sealed their sentence, and they were: Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Zephaniah. Isaiah said: “A prophecy of Moav: For on the night that Ar of Moav is plundered, it is ruined; for on the night that Kir of Moav is plundered, it is ruined” (Isaiah 15:1). Jeremiah said: “Behold, days are coming, the utterance of the Lord, and I will sound to Raba of the children of Amon an alarm of war, and it will become a mound of desolation, and its environs will be burned in fire, and Israel will inherit its inheritors, said the Lord” (Jeremiah 49:2). Ezekiel said: “To the children of the east, against the children of Amon, and I will give it as a heritage, so that the children of Amon will not be remembered among the nations. I will administer punishments to Moav, and they will know that I am the Lord” (Ezekiel 25:10–11). Zephaniah said: “Therefore, as I live, the utterance of the Lord of hosts, God of Israel, Moav will be like Sodom and the children of Amon like Gomorrah, a rustling thornbush, a salt mine, a desolate wasteland forever. The remnant of My people will plunder them and the rest of My nation will inherit them” (Zephaniah 2:9).

(Fol. 19) "The king must not act as a judge, nor be summoned before court." R. Joseph said: This is concerning the kings of Israel; but the kings of the house of David may act as a judge, and can be summoned before court, as it is written (Jer. 21, 12) O house of David, thus said the Lord: Exercise justice on every morning. And if they were not be summoned before court, how could they judge? Behold! it is written (Zeph. 2, 1) Gather yourself together. And Resh Lakish said: "This means first correct thyself, then correct others." Why then is it prohibited to the Kings of Israel? Because of the incident which happened with the slave of King Janai, who murdered a person. Simon b. Shetach said to the sages: "Notwithstanding that he is the slave of the king, he must be tried." They sent word to the king: "Your slave has killed a man." And Janai sent his slave to them to be tried. Whereupon they sent to him: "You also must appear before the court, for the Torah says (Ex. 21, 29) Warning has been given to its owners — i.e., the owner of the ox must appear at the time the ox is tried." He then came and took a seat. "Arise King Janai," said Simon b. Chetach, "so that the witnesses shall testify while you stand; yet not for us do you rise, but for Him who commanded and the world came into being, as it is said (Deut. 19, 17) Stand before the Lord." And the king answered: "It must not be as you say, but as the majority of your colleagues shall decide." (Ib. b) Simon then turned to his right, but they cast their eyes down (were afraid to give their opinion). He turned to his left, and they also cast their eyes down. Simon b. Shetach exclaimed: "You are entertaining consideration [of fear] in your mind! May the One who knows [man's] thoughts take revenge upon you." Thereupon Gabriel came and smote them to the floor, and they died. At that time the sages decreed that a king should neither act as a judge nor appear before court; neither be a witness, nor can anyone testify against him.

Another interpretation (of Lev. 21:1), “Speak unto the priests”: What is written above the matter (in Lev. 20:27)? “When a man or a woman has a ghost or a familiar spirit […].” And afterwards, “Speak unto the priests.” This text is related (to Is. 8:19), “And when they say unto you, ‘Inquire of ghosts and familiar spirits.’”²Lev. R. 6:6. The Holy One, blessed be He, said to Israel, “If they say unto you, ‘Inquire of ghosts, and forsake the God who is in the heavens,’ say to them (ibid. cont.), ‘should not a people inquire of its God?’” Just as Elijah said to Ahaziah (in II Kings 1:3), “Is it for lack of a God in Israel that you are sending to inquire of Baal-Zebub […]?” Why should we forsake the everlasting God? (Jer. 10:10:) “But the Lord is a true God; He is a living God and an everlasting King.” We therefore seek a living God; however, the god[s] of the nations of the world are dead [and (according to Ps. 115:6),] “They have a mouth, but they do not speak; they have eyes but do not see.” [But] about us it is written (in Deut. 4:4), “But you who clung to the Lord your God are all alive today.” We therefore seek a living God. However, [concerning] the god[s] of the nations of the world (according to Ps. 115:6), “Those who make them shall be like them.” What is written after [Is. 8:19], (in vs. 20)? “For instruction (Torah) and for testimony, if they do not speak according to this word, such a one shall have no dawn.”³Similarly in the 1985 JPS translation: FOR ONE WHO SPEAKS THUS THERE SHALL BE NO DAWN. So understood, the clause means that a necromancer will not live to see the dawn. Such a translation fits the immediate context of the midrash. The clause can also mean: SUCH A ONE HAS NO LIGHT, i.e., a necromancer cannot enlighten. This translation better fits the interpretations that follow. R. Johanan and R. Laqish [differed]. R. Johanan said, “The Holy One, blessed be He, said, ‘If they do not speak according to this word to the nations of the world they (sic) have no dawn; I will not shine the dawn upon them.’”⁴See the previous note. [But] R. Laqish says, “It (i.e., the word of a necromancer) shall have no dawn. The ghosts and the familiar spirits do not enlighten (literally, raise up the dawn upon) themselves, since they are [themselves] set in darkness; and all the more does this [principle] hold true for others.” So if you should say, “Of whom shall we inquire?” See, it says (in Deut. 17:9-11), “And you shall come unto the Levitical priests and unto the judge […. You shall act....] According to the Torah which they shall teach you.” (Lev. 20:27:) When a man or a woman has a ghost or a familiar spirit.” What is written after that (in Lev. 21:1)? “Speak unto the priests.” What relation does the one have to the other? It is simply that the Holy One, blessed be He, foresaw that Saul was going to be king over Israel and kill the priests [and] then inquire of a ghost and a familiar spirit. It is so stated (in I Sam. 28:7), “Then Saul said to his servants, ‘Seek me out a woman who controls a ghost.’” Resh Laqish said, “To what is Saul comparable?⁵Lev. R. 26:7; M. Sam. 24. To a king who entered a province and said, ‘All the cocks in this province are to be slaughtered tonight. [When] he wished to depart on his way in the morning, he said, ‘Is there no cock to crow here?’ They said to him, ‘Are you not the one who ordered them to be killed?’ Here also (in I Sam. 28:3) ‘Saul had put away the ghosts and the familiar spirits’; and [now] he went back and said (in vs. 7) ‘Seek me out a woman who controls a ghost.’” (Vs. 8:) “Then Saul disguised himself. What is the meaning of “disguised himself (rt.: hpsh)?” That he had become divested (rt.: hpsh) of the kingship. (Ibid., cont.:) “And he went with two men.” Who were they? Abner and Amasa. The Torah has taught proper protocol, that one does not leave on a journey by oneself; as anyone who leaves on a journey by himself become a slave to slaves. R. Ayyevu said, “Two men acted with proper protocol, Abraham and Saul. [Regarding Abraham it is written (in Gen. 22:3), ‘and he (i.e., Abraham) took with him two of his servants and his son Isaac [...].’ And here (in I Sam. 28:8), ‘and he (Saul) went with two men.’” (Ibid., cont.:) “And they came unto the woman at night.” Was it at night? It is simply that this time was for them as black as night. (Ibid., cont.:) “Then he said, ‘Please divine for me through a ghost […].” She said (in vs. 9) “You know what Saul has done, how he has rooted out the ghosts and the familiar spirits from the land.” He said immediately (in vs. 10), “As the Lord lives, no punishment shall befall you over this matter.” Resh Laqish said, “To what is Saul comparable? To a woman who was situated with her lover and swore by the life of her husband.” (Vs. 11:) “Then the woman said, ‘Whom (Mi) shall I bring up for you?’” One of those who say (as in Exod. 15:11), “Who (Mi) is like You among the powers, O Lord,”⁶Words spoken by Moses, typifying the righteous. The verse is suggested by the mi in Saul’s question. or one of those who say (as in Exod. 5:2:),⁷Words spoken by Pharaoh, typifying the wicked. “Who is the Lord?” He said to her (in I Sam. 28:11, cont.), “Bring up Samuel for me,” the master of the prophets. She did what she did and brought him up. (Vs. 12:) “When the woman saw Samuel, she cried out [with] a loud voice, and the woman spoke [unto Saul, saying], ‘Why have you deceived me? For you are Saul.’” How did she know? Our masters have said, “[A ghost] does not come up for a king as it comes up for a commoner.⁸Gk.: idiotes. For the king its face is up and its feet down, just like everyone [on earth]; but for the commoner its feet are up and its face down.” (Vs. 13:) “Then the king said to her, ‘Do not be afraid; for what do you see?’ And the woman said unto Saul, ‘I saw powers (elohim) coming up from the earth.’” Powers (here in the plural form) implies two. So who were they? Moses and Samuel. When Saul heard this, he was afraid, because he had called one, but two had arisen, as stated, “I saw powers coming up from the earth.” (Vs. 14:) “Then he said to her, ‘What does he look like?’ And she said, ‘An old man is coming up, and he is wrapped in a robe.’” They have said three things about bringing up a [ghost]. 1. The one bringing it up sees it but does not hear its voice. 2. The one asking for it hears its voice but does not see it. 3. Those standing there neither see it nor hear its voice. (Ibid.:) “An old man is coming up, and he is wrapped in a robe.” And elsewhere it says (in I Sam. 2:19), “His mother would make a little robe for him.”⁹Cf. above, Gen. 11:9. It was taught that this was the robe that grew upon him; in it he was buried; in it he rose up. It has been taught in the name of R. Nathan: A garment which goes down to the grave with a person is going to rise on him in the resurrection of the dead.¹⁰yKil. 9:4 (32b). Thus it is stated (in Job 38:14), “It is changed like clay under a seal, and they stand forth as in a garment.” (I Sam. 28:14-15) “Then Saul knew that it was Samuel; so he bowed with his face to the ground and did homage. Samuel said unto Saul, ‘Why have you disturbed me and brought me up? Have you no way to disturb your Creator except through me, in that you have made me an idol.¹¹See Gen. R. 96:5 (6).Did we not teach the following? Just as one exacts punishment from the worshiper, so does one exact punishment from those worshiped.’” Some say, “’Why have you disturbed me?’ [is meaning] that he said to him, ‘I was disturbed lest it be the Day of Judgment, and I was afraid.’” Now here is an argument a fortiori (qal wahomer): For if Samuel, the master of all the prophets, was afraid of the Day of Judgment, how much the more does the rest of humanity [have to fear]? When Rabbi would reach this verse (Amos 4:13), he would cry: “Hate evil and love good, and establish justice in the gate; perhaps the Lord, the God of hosts, will be gracious to the remnant of Joseph.” He said, “So much, and [only] ‘perhaps?’” [Similar is (Zeph. 2:3),] “Seek the Lord, all you humble of the land who have fulfilled His law, seek righteousness, seek humility; perhaps you will find shelter on the day of the Lord’s anger.” R. Haggai said, “[Similarly (in Lamentations 3:29),] ‘Let him put his mouth to the dirt, perhaps there is hope.’” [Similar is the verse (in Lamentations 12:14),] “For God will call every creature to account for everything unknown.” (I Sam. 28:15, cont.:) “And Saul said, ‘I am very distressed […], He (i.e., the Holy One, blessed be He) no longer answers me either through prophets or in dreams….” Why did he not [also] say to him, "[Or] by Urim and Thummim"?¹²According to vs. 6, the Holy One had also failed to answer Saul through this medium. R. Isaac said (Prov. 14:10), “’The heart knows its own bitterness,’ in that he had destroyed Nob, the city of priests.”¹³Lev. R. explains further, that if Saul had brought up the matter of the high priest’s Urim and Thummim, Samuel would have replied that it was he, Saul, who had done away with them by killing the priests at Nob. Samuel said to him, (I Sam. 28:17), “The Lord has done for Himself according to what He spoke through me; for the Lord has torn the kingship out of your hand and given it to your companion, to David.” He said to him, “When you were with us [in the flesh], you said to me (in I Sam. 15:28), ‘and given it to a companion of yours who is better than you’; and now you say, ‘to your companion, to David?’” He said to him. “When I was with you, I was in the world of falsehood, and I was telling you words of falsehood, because I was afraid of you, lest you kill me. Now, however, I am in the world of truth, you will only hear words of truth from me. He did not do this thing to you for no reason. Rather (according to I Sam. 28:18-19), ‘Because you did not hearken to the voice of the Lord and did not carry out his wrath against Amalek…. Moreover, the Lord will deliver Israel along with you into the hand of the Philistines; and tomorrow you and your sons will be with me.’”” With me,” [means] in my section [of heaven]. When he heard this, (according to vs. 20), “Immediately Saul fell full length to the ground, for he was terrified because of Samuel's words.” Abner and Amasa said to him, “What did [Samuel] say to you?” He said to them, “He said to me, ‘Tomorrow you will go down to battle and be victorious. In addition, your sons will be appointed to be great leaders’”. Resh Laqish said, “At that time the Holy One, blessed be He, called the ministering angels. He said to them, ‘Come and see the creature that I have created in My world. By universal custom when one goes to a banquet house, he does not take his children with him for fear of the evil eye; but this one, when he is going down to battle and knows that he will be killed, takes his sons with him and is happy over the divine justice that is striking him.’”¹⁴M. Pss. 7:2. R. Joshua of Sikhnin said in the name of R. Levi, “[This] teaches that the Holy One, blessed be He, showed Moses every generation and its expositors, every generation and its judges, every generation and its kings; and he showed him Saul and his sons falling by the sword.¹⁵Tanna deve Eliyahu Zuta, 6; cf. Sanh. 38b; AZ 5a, according to both of which the expositors and other generational leaders were shown to Adam. He said to him, ‘Master of the world, will the first king to stand over Your children be pierced by the sword?’ He said to him, ‘Moses, [why] are you telling me? Tell the priests whom he killed. [They are the ones] who are denouncing¹⁶Gk.: kategorein. him,’ as stated, ‘And the Lord spoke to Moses, “Speak to the priests.”’” Our masters have taught, “That righteous man (i.e., Saul) was killed for five sins. Thus it is stated (in I Chron. 10:13), ‘So Saul died for his transgression which he committed against the Lord’: Because he had destroyed Nob, the city of priests; Because he had spared Agag; Because he had not hearkened to Samuel, as stated (in I Sam. 10:8), ‘wait seven days …,’ since he did not do so; but (according to I Sam. 13:12), ‘and I forced myself to offer the burnt offering’; (In I Chron. 10:13-14) ‘and also he inquired for counsel through a ghost; And he did not inquire through the Lord.’”

(Deut. 22:6-7), “You come across a bird nest, [….] You must surely let the mother go.” This text is related (to Prov. 4:23), “More than any observance preserve your heart, for out of it comes life.” R. Abba said, “There are two hundred and forty-eight positive commandments in the Torah corresponding to the organs that are in a human being; for each and every day they cry out at the person, ‘Perform a commandment with me so that we may live through its merit and you may lengthen your life.’ There are also three hundred and sixty-five negative commandments like the number of the solar days. So on each and every day while the sun rises until it sets, it speaks and cries out at a person, ‘Decree me upon yourself by the One who has brought your days up to this day. Do not commit this transgression against me, and do not tilt yourself and the whole world toward the scale of guilt.’” Here are six hundred and thirteen commandments. Moreover, for each and every commandment there is a recorded reward. For example honoring father and mother (in Exod. 20:12 // Deut. 5:16) and leaving a nest alone (in Deut. 22:7) about which it is written, a lengthening of life. There are also commandments with children as the reward; as, for example, Sarah, who hosted guests (in Gen. 18:6-14), and the Shunammite woman, who received Elisha (II Kings. 4:8-17). There is [also] a transgression, [which may] require stoning, burning, slaying (with the sword),⁸Hereg. See Sanh. 7:3, for the interpretation of hereg as beheading with a sword. or strangulation.⁹For details on all four types of execution, see ibid., 6:4; 7:1–3. Of all the commandments, none is as easy as leaving a nest alone. And what it its remuneration (according to Deut. 22:7)? “In order that it may be well with you and you may lengthen your life.” A parable: To what is the matter comparable? To a king who brought laborers into his field to plant it but did not reveal to them the remuneration for their planting. At evening he gave one gold coin to whoever planted a tree. They all began to be amazed and say, “Now if the one who has only planted a light and small tree [has received] one gold coin, how much the more will there be for us who have planted many [of them].”¹⁰Cf. Deut. R. 6:2. So if the remuneration for leaving a nest alone has a lengthening of life as its remuneration, how much more will be the remuneration for a commandment in which there is material loss, hardship, and [the need to] preserve one's life? For this reason the Holy One, blessed be He, did not explain the remuneration for the commandments which are in the Torah, so that Israel of its own accord would fulfill them and thereby increase the remuneration. Thus we have learned (in Avot 1:3), “Do not be like servants who serve the master for the sake of receiving a reward […].” It is therefore written (in Prov. 4:23), “More than any observance preserve your heart, [for out of it comes life].” There is a story about someone who went up to the top of a tree to fulfill the commandment of leaving a nest alone, and he fell and died. [This is] because it is stated (Deut. 22:7), “When you come across a bird nest on the way,” and not that you see it at the top of the trees and go up after it. The verse (Ps. 94:12) states, “Happy is the man whom You discipline, O Lord, the man You instruct in Your Torah.” Rabbi Elazar ben Yaakov said, “A man must remember gratitude to the Holy One, blessed be He, at a time when afflictions come upon him. Why? Because afflictions draw a man to the Holy One, blessed be He, as it is stated (Prov. 3:12), ‘For whom the Lord loves, He rebukes, as a father the son whom he favors.’” R. Shimon bar Yochai said, “If a man’s son dies, he should not voice a complaint, as the son causes him to be acceptable to the Holy One, blessed be He.” There is a parable: To what is the matter comparable? To a king who became angry with the son of his daughter, and someone else came and made this son of his acceptable in front of the king. That son of the daughter says, “Do [I] not need to remember gratitude to the one that made [me] acceptable?” So [too] if a man’s son dies, he should remember gratitude to the Holy One, blessed be He, as the son made the father acceptable to his Creator. Why? (As in Prov. 3:12), “For whom the Lord loves, He rebukes, [as a father the son whom he favors].” Therefore David said in (Ps. 94:12), “Happy is the man whom You discipline, O Lord.” If afflictions come to a person, he should stand firm and accept them. Why? As there is no end to its remuneration. And from where (in Scripture) do you learn [this]? From the tooth and the eye [that is injured], through which a gentile slave goes out to freedom. Is it not [then] fitting that afflictions that scour the entire body of man atone? R. Chiya bar Abba said, “Since it is stated about the one that fulfills the commandment of leaving the nest alone, ‘in order that it may be well with you,’ all the more so will the death of a man’s child atone for him.” (Deut. 22:7:) “And the young (literally, children) take for yourself.” If you do not have children, I will give you children as the reward for this commandment. Another interpretation of (Deut. 22:7), “You must surely let [the mother] go.” If you let them go, (as in Is. 59:18) “According to their deeds, so shall He repay.” [See] what is written (in Jer. 50:33-34), “The children of Israel are oppressed […] they refuse to let them go. Their redeemer is mighty, [His name is] the Lord of hosts; He shall surely fight their fight.” [It also says (in Is. 16:2),] “For it shall be that the daughters of Moab at the fords of the Arnon shall be like a migrating bird, an abandoned nest.” This text is related (to Jer. 17:11), “As a partridge hatches without laying, so is one who makes money apart from justice….” What is written after that (in vs. 12)? “A glorious throne exalted from the beginning, our sacred shrine.” What is the connection between the two [verses]? Whoever says a partridge hatches is [really] saying a glorious throne. [This is] to teach you that a partridge brings eggs from other birds and sits on them until [the young] emerge from their shells and become fledglings. Then they rise up over it and pluck its wings. When it goes out to fly, it is unable [to do so] because its wings are plucked. So a wild beast or reptile finds it and eats it. And what caused its [destruction]? [It happened] because it had raised eggs that were not its own. So it shall be with the peoples of the world and the Moabites and the Ammonites that stretched their hands against (according to Jer. 17:12) His glorious throne, destroyed His sacred shrine, burned His Temple, and carried Israel into exile. The Holy One, blessed be He, shall destroy their memory, as the matter is stated (in Zeph. 2:9), “Therefore, as I live, says the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel, surely Moab shall become like Sodom, [and the children of Ammon like Gomorrah].”

(Deut. 22:7): YOU MUST SURELY LET <THE MOTHER> GO. If you let it¹⁴The parallel in Tanh., Deut. 6:2 reads “them.” go, (Is. 59:18:) ACCORDING TO THEIR DEEDS, SO SHALL HE REPAY. See what is written (in Jer. 50:33): THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL ARE OPPRESSED…. THEY REFUSE TO LET THEM GO. It also says (in vs. 34): THEIR REDEEMER IS MIGHTY, <HIS NAME IS> THE LORD OF HOSTS. It also says (in Is. 16:2): FOR IT SHALL BE THAT THE DAUGHTERS OF MOAB AT THE FORDS OF THE ARNON SHALL BE LIKE A MIGRATING BIRD, AN ABANDONED NEST. This text is related (to Jer. 17:11): AS A PARTRIDGE HATCHES WITHOUT LAYING, SO IS ONE WHO MAKES MONEY APART FROM JUSTICE…. What is written after that (in vs. 12): A GLORIOUS THRONE EXALTED FROM THE BEGINNING, OUR SACRED SHRINE. What is the connection between the two <verses>? Whoever says A PARTRIDGE HATCHES is <really> saying A GLORIOUS THRONE. <This is> to teach you that a partridge brings eggs from other birds and sits on them until <the young> emerge from their shells and become fledglings. Then they rise up over it and pluck its wings. When it goes out to fly, it is unable <to do so> because its wings are plucked. So a wild beast or reptile finds it and eats it. And what caused his <destruction>? <It happened> because it had raised eggs that were not its own. So it shall be with the peoples of the world, when they stretch their hands against (according to Jer. 17:12) A GLORIOUS THRONE EXALTED FROM THE BEGINNING, OUR SACRED SHRINE. They destroyed it, burned its temple, and carried Israel into exile. But as for Moab and Ammon, the Holy One shall destroy their memory, as stated (in Zeph. 2:9): THEREFORE, AS I LIVE, SAYS THE LORD OF HOSTS, [THE GOD OF ISRAEL,] SURELY MOAB SHALL BECOME LIKE SODOM, AND THE CHILDREN OF AMMON LIKE GOMORRAH, …, AND DESOLATION EVERMORE. A REMNANT OF MY PEOPLE SHALL PLUNDER THEM….

“Let him sit alone and be silent, because He has laid it upon him” (Lamentations 3:28).
“Let him sit alone and be silent” – Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman said: The Holy One blessed be He summoned the ministering angels and said to them: ‘A mourning king of flesh and blood, what does he do?’ They said to Him: ‘He dons black and covers his head with sackcloth.’ He said: ‘I, too, will do so.’ That is what is written: “I clothe heavens with blackness and I make sackcloth their garment” (Isaiah 50:3).
Moreover, He asked them: ‘A mourning king of flesh and blood, what [else] does he do?’ They said to him: ‘He extinguishes the lights.’ He said to them: ‘I, too, will do so.’ That is what is written: “The sun and the moon darkened, and the stars withdrew their shine” (Joel 2:10).
Moreover, He asked them: ‘A mourning king of flesh and blood, what [else] does he do?’ They said to him: ‘He walks barefoot.’ He said to them: ‘I, too, will do so.’ That is what is written: “The Lord, in a tempest and in a storm is His way, and clouds are the dust of His feet” (Nahum 1:3).
Moreover, He asked them: ‘A mourning king of flesh and blood, what [else] does he do?’ They said to him: ‘He sits and is silent.’ He said to them: ‘I, too, will do so.’ That is what is written: “Let him sit alone and be silent, because He has laid it upon him.”⁵⁷The verse is understood to mean that God will be silent because He has brought the mourning upon Himself.
“Let him put his mouth in the dust, perhaps there is hope. Let him offer his cheek to one who strikes him; let him be filled with disgrace” (Lamentations 3:29–30).
“Let him put his mouth in the dust, perhaps there is hope. Let him offer his cheek to one who strikes him; let him be filled with disgrace” – Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi] was interpreting verses and when he reached the following verses, he would weep: “Samuel said to Saul: Why did you disturb me to bring me up?” (I Samuel 28:15).⁵⁸The Gemara in Ḥagiga (4b) indicates that Samuel thought he was being summoned to a heavenly judgement and was scared. If Samuel, the great prophet, was scared of heavenly judgement, all the more so those of lesser stature should be scared. This is why Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi cried when reading this verse. And it is written: “For behold, He forms mountains and creates winds; He recounts to a person what were his deeds [seḥo]” (Amos 4:13) – even matters lacking substance are written for a person in his ledger.⁵⁹This is derived from the term seḥo, which can be interpreted to mean speech [siḥo]; God keeps track even of every frivolous comment a person might make (see Ḥagiga 5b). Who writes them? “He who turns dawn into darkness…[the Lord, the God of hosts, is His name]” (Amos 4:13). “Seek the Lord all you humble of the earth…” (Zephaniah 2:3). And it is written: “Hate evil, and love good, [and display justice at the gate; perhaps the Lord, God of hosts, will be gracious to the remnant of Joseph]” (Amos 5:15).⁶⁰Despite there being an abundance of virtue, nevertheless, only perhaps “He will be gracious”? Why? “For every action God will bring to judgment [for every unknown]” (Ecclesiastes 12:14).⁶¹God will bring judgment even for unknown, that is, unwitting, transgressions. And this, “let him put his mouth in the dust [perhaps there is hope].”⁶²Only perhaps there is hope? And it is written: “Let him offer his cheek to one who strikes him; let him be filled with disgrace.”⁶³After all this, the end result could very well be disgrace.

“Let us search and examine our ways, and return to the Lord. Let us lift up our heart with our hands to God in the heavens” (Lamentations 3:40–41).
“Let us search and examine our ways, and return to the Lord. Let us lift up our heart with our hands to God in the heavens” – Rabbi Beiva bar Zavdai, Rabbi Tanḥum bar Ḥanilai, and Rabbi Yoshiya went out for a fast.⁶⁵On fast days, the congregation would take the ark out to the city square and pray there. See Mishna Taanit 2:1. Rabbi Beiva bar Zavdai expounded and said: Is it possible that a person’s heart is taken from him and returns to him?⁶⁶What, then, is the meaning of the verse “Let us lift up our heart with our hands”? Rather, we should focus our hearts on our hands,⁶⁷We must ensure that our hands have not engaged in malfeasance with another’s property. and only thereafter to God in the heavens. If there is a swarming creature in a person’s hand, even if he immerses himself in all of the primordial waters, he will never be purified. If he casts the swarming creature from his hand, his immersion is effective for him [even] in forty se’a.
Rabbi Tanḥuma expounded: “The princes of Israel and the king humbled themselves and said: The Lord is righteous” (II Chronicles 12:6). And it is written: “When the Lord saw that they had humbled themselves, the word of the Lord was with Shemaya, saying: They have humbled themselves; I will not destroy them, and I will grant them a small measure of deliverance, and My wrath will not be poured upon Jerusalem by means of Shishak” (II Chronicles 12:7). It is not written here, “when the Lord saw that they had fasted,” but rather, “that they had humbled themselves.”
Rabbi Yoshiya expounded: “Gather yourselves, gather [hitkosheshu vakoshu]” (Zephaniah 2:1) – let us adorn [nekashet] ourselves and thereafter adorn others. Because there is a person who is here who slandered me before Rabbi Yoḥanan; let the entire people stand for judgment.⁶⁸He demanded that the individual who had slandered him repent before exhorting others to do so, and so too that each person repent from his sins. They said: Rabbi Ḥiyya, Rabbi Ami, and Rabbi Yosei were there. They stood and went out.⁶⁹Some explain that it is because they were the guilty parties and they were angry that he had called them out (Yefe Anaf). Others explain that they sought to spare the guilty party the public shame (Matnot Kehuna).
“We have transgressed and defied; You have not forgiven” (Lamentations 3:42).
“We have transgressed and defied [umarinu]” – the Rabbis there⁷⁰In Babylon said: When the endives are bitter [meriran], the vinegar is sour.⁷¹This translation is based on the interpretation of Rabbi David Luria. He explains that the endives are dipped in the vinegar. The point is that Israel sinned, and so too God was strict in exercising judgment. There are alternate interpretations of this line in the midrash; see, e.g., Matnot Kehuna. The Rabbis here⁷²In the Land of Israel said: If actions are evil, they are harsh for the one who performs them. Rabbi Huna said in the name of Rav Yosef: “We have transgressed and defied” – as is our wont. “You have not forgiven” – is that Your wont? Rabbi Levi said: “We have transgressed and defied” – and You destroyed Your Temple.⁷³As “You have not forgiven.”

Rabbi Yudan and Rabbi Azarya. Rabbi Yudan said: The congregation of Israel said before the Holy One blessed be He: ‘Master of the universe, because You acted with my neighbors with the attribute of justice, and with me with the attribute of mercy, I will run after You,’ as Rabbi Berekhya said in the name of Rabbi Elazar: What was not done to the Generation of the Flood was done to the Ten Tribes. Regarding the Generation of the Flood it is written: “Only evil the entire day” (Genesis 6:5), and regarding the Ten Tribes it is written: “Woe, the devisers of iniquity who perform evil on their beds” (Micah 2:1). That is at night; in the morning, from where is it derived? “In the morning light they perform it, for it is in their power” (Micah 2:1). From them, no remnant remained, but from these, a remnant remained;¹⁶²The Generation of the Flood sinned only during the day and there were no survivors, while the Ten Tribes sinned night and day, and there were survivors. by what merit? Rabbi Yitzḥak interpreted it to their credit, [as] Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi] said: It was by the merit of, “behold a remnant remained in it, [who are brought forth]” (Ezekiel 14:22), “who bring forth” is not written here, but rather, “who are brought forth.” [This teaches that a remnant remained] in the merit of the righteous men and the righteous women, the prophets and the prophetesses, who would emerge from them.
Rabbi Ḥanina said: A statement was made regarding the coastal cities that was not stated regarding the Generation of the Flood: “Woe to the inhabitants of the seacoast, the nation of the Keretim” (Zephaniah 2:5)—a nation that is liable to be punished with karet. By whose merit were they rescued? It was by the merit of one God-fearing person whom they produced each and every year. Rabbi Levi interpreted it to their credit: “Woe to the inhabitants of the seacoast, the nation of the Keretim”—a nation that established [karat] a covenant,¹⁶³This is an allusion to the fact that some members of this nation converted and fulfilled the covenant of circumcision. This merit prevented the destruction of the nation at that time, but the punishment was only temporarily averted (Etz Yosef). as it is stated: “He established [vekharot] a covenant with him” (Nehemiah 9:8).
Rabbi Yehoshua bar Nehemiah said in the name of Rabbi Aḥa: A statement was made regarding the tribes of Judah and Benjamin that was not stated regarding the Sodomites. Regarding the Sodomites it is written: “Their sin is very weighty” (Genesis 18:20), but regarding the tribes of Judah and Benjamin it is written: “He said to me: The iniquity of the house of Israel and Judah is very very great” (Ezekiel 9:9). Rabbi Tanḥuma said: We have another verse: “The iniquity of the daughter of my people exceeded [the sin of Sodom, which was overthrown in a moment, and no hands seized it]” (Lamentations 4:6). Rabbi Tanḥuma said: One hand did not seize another, they did not extend their hands to perform mitzvot; but these extended their hands to perform mitzvot.¹⁶⁴Rabbi Tanḥuma explains why Sodom was overthrown in a moment whereas the tribes of Judah and Benjamin were not, despite the fact that their sins were greater than those of Sodom. The Sodomites did not extend their hands to assist one another or perform mitzvot, whereas the tribes of Judah and Benjamin did. “The hands of merciful women [cooked their children, they were food for them]" (Lamentations 4:10). Why [did they act] in such a way? It was because they provided “food [levarot] for them in the disaster of the daughter of my people” (Lamentations 4:10).¹⁶⁵The midrash interprets the verse in Lamentations to mean the starving people of Jerusalem would give the small amount of food they had to others in order to attempt to console [lehavrot] them for the loss of family members. The reference to cooking their children is understood allegorically in the sense that they deprived them of food in order to console others. Thus, the verse states that the merciful women deprived their own children of food. Why did they act in such a way? In order to attempt to console others.

... “And David went and he took the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son from the men of Jabesh- gilead… And he brought up from there the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son…” (Shmuel II 21:12-13) What did David do? He went and gathered all the elders and great ones of Israel, crossed the Jordan River, and came to Yavesh-gilead. He found the bones of Shaul and his son Yonatan, placed them in a casket and crossed back over the Jordan, as it says “And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father and they did all that the king commanded…” (Shmuel II 21:14) What does ‘in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father’ mean? It comes to teach us that they brought them to the border of Jerusalem and buried them there. Zela is next to Jerusalem, as it says “And Zelah, Eleph, and the Jebusite, which is Jerusalem…” (Yehoshua 18:28) ‘and they did all that the king commanded’ And what did the king command? He commanded that they carry Shaul’s casket from tribe to tribe. As Shaul’s casket entered each tribe’s territory all the men, women and children came out in order to perform an act of loving kindness to Shaul and his sons and thereby all of Israel would fulfill its obligation to loving kindness. This went on until they reached the land of his portion on the border of Jerusalem. Since the Holy One saw that they did loving kindness to Shaul and fulfilled the judgement of the Givonites He was immediately filled with mercy and sent rain upon the land, as it says “And God was entreated for the land after that.” (Shmuel II 21:14) From this we learn how close the Holy One brings those that are far away, even though they converted not for the sake of heaven. There is no need to even mention how he draws near righteous converts, “O Lord, all the kings of the earth will acknowledge You…” (Tehillim 138:4)

R. Chana b. Adda said: "The decree concerning the Gibeonites was issued by David, as it is said (II Sam. 21, 2) And the king called for the Gibeonites and said unto them: now the Gibeonites are not of the children of Israel." Why did David make such a decree against them? Because, as it is written And then was a famine in the days of David three years, year after year. During the first year of the famine, David said to Israel: "Perhaps there are odilaters amongst ye, concerning which it is written (Deut. 11, 16) And ye turn aside and serve other gods, and worship them. Then the Lord's wrath will be kindled against you, and He will shut up the heavens that there be no rain." They investigated and found nothing of the kind. During the second year [of the famine] ( he again said to them: "Perhaps there are amongst you adulterers, concerning whom it is written (Jer. 3, 3) And [though] the early showers were with-holden, and the later rain came not, yet hadst thou a forehead of incestuous wife." Thereupon they investigated, but again found nothing of the kind. Upon the third year of the famine, David said to Israel: "Perhaps there are amongst you such that subscribed to charity in public and refused to pay, concerning which it is written (Pr. 25, 14) Like clouds and wind without rain, so is man that vaunteth falsely of a gift." They investigated and again did not find any trace of it. David then said: "The cause hangs upon none else but myself." Immediately (II Sam. 21, 1) and David besought the presence of the Lord. What does this mean? Resh Lakish said: "He asked information through the Urim and the Tummim." What is the intimation for it? Said R. Elazar: "We infer through the [analogy of expression] of the word R'nei, P'nei. It is written here (Ib.) And David besought the presence (P'nei) of the Lord, and it is written there (Num 27, 21) and he shall ask of him after the Judgment of the Urim before (Li-phnei) the Lord." (II Sam. 21, 1) And the Lord said, On account of Saul, and on account of the house of blood is this; because he hath slain the Gibeonites; i.e., on account of Saul, that he was not eulogized properly; and on account of the house of blood, because he hath slain the Gibeonites. Where do we find that Saul had slain the Gibeonites? We must therefore say that because he had slain the inhabitants of Nob, the city of the priests, who supported the Gibeonites with water and food [thus cutting off their support,] Scripture considers it as if he had actually slain them." Because Saul was not eulogized properly [Saul's honor,] and at the same time He demands because he had slain the Gibeonites [hence Saul's destruction?] Indeed so; for Resh Lakish said: "What is the meaning of the passage (Zeph. 2, 3) Seek ye the Lord, all ye meek of the earth, who have fulfilled His ordinances; i.e., in the same place where one is judged for his [bad actions,] also his [good deeds] are recorded. David then said: "As to Saul's grievances twelve months have already elapsed (Fol. 69) and it is not customary to make a funeral address any longer. But concerning the Gibeonites, let us call them and try to appease them." (II Sam. 21, 2-6) And the king called for the Gibeonite, and said unto them, etc. What shall I do for you? and wherewith shall I make the atonement, that ye may bless the inheritance of the Lord? And the Gibeonites said unto him: We have no concern of silver or gold with Saul and with his house, nor do we wish, etc. Let there be delivered unto us seven men of his sons, and we will hang them up unto the Lord. David tried to appease them [with any other thing but that:] however, they were not conciliated. David then said: "This nation (Israel) is recognized by three characteristic features, they are merciful, chaste and charitable. Merciful, as it is written (Deut. 13, 18) and grant thee mercy, and have mercy upon them and multiply thee; chaste, as it is written (Ex. 20, 20) and in order that His fear may be before your faces; charitable, as it is written (Gen. 18, 19) that he will command his children and his household, etc., with whomsoever possesses these characteristic features it is befitting to be associated, but with whomsoever posseses not these characteristic features it is not fitting to be associated."

Raba b. R. Huna possessed a forest on the shore of a river, and when he was asked to cut it down he answered: "Let the forests which are before and behind mine be cut down, and then I will cut down mine." But how could he answer so? Is it not written (Zeph. 2, 1) Gather yourselves together. And Resh Lakish said: This means "Correct thyself first, and then others." The forests before and behind him belonged to a governor of the Persians, Parzak (Fol. 108), and Rabba was aware that he would not agree to cut down his, consequently the carriers of the boats could not pass anyhow; and what would be the use of cutting down his own? Rabba b. R. Nachman was sailing a boat, and had seen a forest on a shore, and to the question. Whose is it? he was told that it was Rabba b. R. Huna's. Rabba b. R. Nachman applied to him the verse (Ezra 9, 2) And the hand of the princes and the rulers hath been the first in this trespass, and ordered his people to cut it down. When Rabba b. R. Huna came and found them cutting, remarked: "He who has cut this, his own branches shall be cut off." And it was said that during all the years of the existence of Rabba b. R. Huna the children of Rabba b. R. Nachman did not live long.

(Fol. 48) "Since the Sanhedrin were abolished, with them was abolished the custom of singing [while in the wine-houses drinking], as it is said (Is. 24, 9) Amidst singing, etc." And whence do we know that this refers to the Sanhedrin? Said R. Huna, the son of R. Joshua: "The passage says (Lam. 5, 14) The elders have ceased from the gate, young men from their singing." R. Udna said: "He who listens to songs will at the end suffer punishment," Raba said: "In a house where there is frequent singing destruction will be the result, as it is said (Zef. 2, 14) Singing birds shall sing in the windows, ruin shall be on the threshholds; for the cedar waves shall be cut away. What does for the cedar waves shall be cut away, mean? Said R. Isaac, "Even a house covered with cedars will at the end be cut away." R. Assi said: "From this it may be inferred that ruin of a house begins with the threshold, as it is said, Ruins shall be on the threshold, and if you wish I shall say it may be inferred from the following: (Is. 24, 12) And in ruins is bitten the gate." R. Huna said: '"Singing while at work on a ship or while plowing is permitted, but otherwise is prohibited." R. Huna caused the abolition of singing, thereupon the market became so cheap that one hundred geese were bought for a Zuza and even for that amount there was no demand. Thereupon R. Chisda came and did not enforce the act of abolition when it came about that each goose was bought for a Zuza and even at that price there was not sufficient supply. R. Joseph said: "Men singing, and women responding is considered licentiousness. When women sing and men respond it is like flax placed before fire." What is the difference since both of them are prohibited? The difference is against which one we should put more efforts to have it abolished. Said R. Jochanan: "Whoever serves a banquet accompanied by four instruments of music, will bring five calamities upon the world, as it is said (Is. 5, 11) Woe unto those that get up early in the morning, that they may run for strong drink… . and the harp and the psaltry, the tabaret and the pipe, and wine are in their feasts. What is written after this (Ib., ib. 1.5) Therefore were My people lead unto exile, for want of knowledge, ie., this causes exile upon the world; and the honorable men suffer of famine, i.e., which brings hunger upon the world; and their multitude are panting with thirst, i.e., which causes the Torah to be forgotten from its learnings, (Ib., ib. 15) And then shall be the son of earth, and humble shall he the man, i.e., who caused lowering down to the enemies of the Holy One, praised be He, and the word Ish refers to the Lord as it is said (Ex. 15, 3) The Eternal is the Lord of war (Ish Milchama). (Is. 5, 15) And the eye of the lofty shall be hungry, who caused humbleness to Israel. What is written afterwards (Ib., ib. 14) Therefore hath the deep enlarged her desire, etc.

Rabbi Yitzḥak began: “We are ashamed, for we heard disgrace; humiliation covered our faces, as strangers came upon the sanctuaries of the House of the Lord” (Jeremiah 51:51). You find that when the enemies entered Jerusalem, Amonites and Moavites entered with them, as it is stated: “The besieger spread his hand over all its delights; for it saw the nations entering its Sanctuary, whom You had commanded that they should not enter Your assembly” (Lamentations 1:10).²³Regarding the Amonites and Moavites it is written: “An Amonite or a Moavite shall not enter into the assembly of the Lord” (Deuteronomy 23:4). They entered the Holy of Holies and found there two cherubs. They took them, placed them in a cage, and were circulating it in the streets of Jerusalem and saying: Did you not say that this nation does not engage in idol worship? Look at what we found of theirs and what they were worshipping. All faces are the same.²⁴They are like other nations in that they, too, worship idols. That is what is written: “Because Moav and Seir say: Behold, the house of Judah is like all the nations” (Ezekiel 25:8). At that moment, the Holy One blessed be He took an oath that He will completely exterminate them from the world, as it is stated: “Therefore, as I live, the word of the Lord of hosts, God of Israel, Moav will be like Sodom and the children of Amon like Gomorrah” (Zephaniah 2:9). When they sinned²⁵This is referring to the Israelites. they were exiled. When they were exiled, Jeremiah began lamenting in their regard, eikha.
Another matter: “We are ashamed, for we heard disgrace (Jeremiah 51:51), this is the seventeenth of Tammuz. “Humiliation covered our faces” (Jeremiah 51:51) – this is the ninth of Av. “As strangers came upon the sanctuaries of the House of the Lord” (Jeremiah 51:51) – the first destruction and the second destruction. When they sinned they were exiled. When they were exiled, Jeremiah began lamenting in their regard, eikha.

Variantly: "You have inclined Your right hand": When the Holy One inclines His hand, the wicked go lost from the world, viz. (Tzephaniah 2:13) "And He will stretch out His hand to the north, and Ashur will go lost, etc." and (Ezekiel 25:15) "Behold, I will stretch out My hand against the Philistines, etc." An analogy: eggs in a man's hand. He inclines his hand a little and they all fall and break, viz. (Isaiah 31:3) "and the L rd will incline His hand, and the helper will stumble and the helped will fall, etc."

“For every action God will bring to judgment, for every unknown, whether good or evil” (Ecclesiastes 12:14).
“For every action” – Rabbi would interpret these verses, and when he would arrive at one of these six verses, he would weep. These are they: “For behold the Former of mountains, [and Creator of wind, who tells man what is his conversation]” (Amos 4:13). Even matters that do not have substance or sin are written for Him in His ledger. Who writes them? “He who renders dawn, darkness…[the Lord, God of hosts, is His name]” (Amos 4:13).
In addition: “Seek the Lord, all you humble of the earth, [who have performed His judgment; seek righteousness, seek humility. Perhaps you shall be hidden in the day of the Lord’s anger]” (Zephaniah 2:3).
[In addition:] “Hate evil, and love good, [and display justice at the gate; perhaps the Lord, God of hosts, will grant favor to the remnant of Joseph]” (Amos 5:15).
And this verse: “For every action God [will bring to judgment, for every unknown, whether good or evil].” “Without knowledge, even the soul is no good” (Proverbs 19:2) – Rabbi Beivai said: [This is likened] to one who was accustomed to engage in relations [with his wife] at sunrise. He forgot⁶²He forgot that the expected time had come for his wife to menstruate, and he was therefore obliged to refrain from engaging in marital relations with her (see Nidda 63b). and engaged in relations before sunrise.⁶³His wife menstruated at that time, and they unwittingly violated the prohibition to engage in relations while she was menstruating. If he did so without knowledge, it is not good,⁶⁴Even if he forgot that he was supposed to separate from her, he bears responsibility. The midrash reads this into the phrase “no good” in the verse in Proverbs. and all the more so if he did so with knowledge. Furthermore, “he who hastens with his feet sins” (Proverbs 19:2).⁶⁵One who rushes down a path leading to sin is held responsible for his sins, even if he committed them unwittingly (Midrash HaMevo’ar).
[This is likened] to one who had two stores before him, one selling slaughtered meat and one selling meat from an unslaughtered carcass, and he forgot and purchased the meat of the unslaughtered carcass. “Without knowledge…no good” (Proverbs 19:2), and all the more so if he did so with knowledge. Furthermore, “he who hastens with his feet sins” (Proverbs 19:2).
Rabbi Yoḥanan interpreted the verse regarding Shabbat. [This is likened] to one who had two paths before him, one smooth and one filled with thorns and pebbles, and he forgot and went on the one in which there were thorns and pebbles.⁶⁶Even though he forgot that there were thorns there, and walking through them would involve detaching some of them from the ground, which constitutes a violation of Shabbat, he is held accountable for this violation. Had he known and gone, all the more so.
Rabbi Yoḥanan and Reish Lakish interpreted this verse.⁶⁷They interpreted “he who hastens with his feet sins” to mean that one should not come to the Temple frequently to bring sacrificial offerings to atone for any sins he may not realize that he has committed; it would be preferable to just be careful to avoid sin. Rabbi Yoḥanan said: With vow offerings and gift offerings it is prohibited; with sin offerings and guilt offerings it is permitted. Reish Lakish said: With vow offerings and gift offerings it is permitted; with sin offerings and guilt offerings it is prohibited.
Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon said: If one performs one transgression without knowledge it is not good; if he knew and went and performed [the transgression], all the more so. Therefore, “for every action God will bring to judgment, for every unknown, whether good or evil.” He said: A servant whose master considers his unwitting transgressions like intentional transgressions, does he have recourse?⁶⁸One should avoid sinning even unwittingly.
What is “for every unknown”? That is one who kills a louse in the presence of another person and [the other person] is disgusted.⁶⁹One is punished even for this small offense of causing discomfort to the other person. Shmuel said: This is one who expectorates before another person and [the other person] is disgusted.
What is “whether good or evil”? The school of Rabbi Yannai says: This is one who gives a coin to a poor person in public, as when Rabbi Yannai saw a man who gave a coin to a poor person in public, he said: It would have been preferable had you not given to him, than now, when you gave to him and shamed him.⁷⁰Thus, the verse is indicating that one can be punished even for an act that is inherently good, such as giving charity.
The school of Rabbi Shila says: This is one who gives charity to a woman in private, as he causes her to become suspected.⁷¹Although his intention in giving her charity in secret is noble, his actions may have a detrimental effect; when people notice a man secretly visiting her, they suspect her of illicit activity.
Rava said; This is one who sends uncut meat to his wife on Friday.⁷²The reference is to meat from which the sciatic nerve and forbidden fats have not been removed. Since it is close to Shabbat, she will be in a rush and might not remove all of the prohibited portions. Is this so? But did Rava not send [in this manner]? The daughter of Rav Ḥisda⁷³Rava’s wife was different, as he knew that she [would successfully remove all the prohibited portions]. <“Whether good or evil”.>

... R’ Shimon bar Aba said in the name of R’ Yochanan: any where that it says ‘and it was’ (vayehi) it indicates distress and joy. If it is distress there is no distress like it and if it is joy there is no joy like it. R’ Shmuel ben Nachmani came and split the teaching in half. Anywhere that it says ‘and it was’ (vayehi) indicates distress, ‘and it will be’ (v’haya) indicates joy…The brought a challenge from this verse “…and he was [there] (v’haya) when Jerusalem was taken.” (Jeremiah 38:28) He said to them: this is still a cause of joy because on that very day Israel received full payment for their sins. As R’ Shmuel ben Nachmani said: Israel received full payment for their sins on the day the Holy Temple was destroyed, as it says “Your iniquity is finished, O daughter of Zion…” (Lamentations 4:22)