Halakhah for Numbers 18:15
כָּל־פֶּ֣טֶר רֶ֠חֶם לְֽכָל־בָּשָׂ֞ר אֲשֶׁר־יַקְרִ֧יבוּ לַֽיהוָ֛ה בָּאָדָ֥ם וּבַבְּהֵמָ֖ה יִֽהְיֶה־לָּ֑ךְ אַ֣ךְ ׀ פָּדֹ֣ה תִפְדֶּ֗ה אֵ֚ת בְּכ֣וֹר הָֽאָדָ֔ם וְאֵ֛ת בְּכֽוֹר־הַבְּהֵמָ֥ה הַטְּמֵאָ֖ה תִּפְדֶּֽה׃
Every thing that openeth the womb, of all flesh which they offer unto the LORD, both of man and beast, shall be thine; howbeit the first-born of man shalt thou surely redeem, and the firstling of unclean beasts shalt thou redeem.
Gray Matter III
A very exciting and relatively new area of halachic concern is the potential effect of archaeological discoveries upon halachic decision-making. The areas of possible impact include proper positioning of mezuzot, mikveh construction, identification of techeilet, the proper time for megillah reading, and the weight of coins used for pidyon haben (redemption of the firstborn).1The Torah (Bemidbar 18:15-16) requires that a firstborn male child be “redeemed” by giving five shekalim to a kohen. We will discuss the extent to which Halachah accords credibility to archaeological discoveries and conclusions.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Sefer HaChinukh
The commandment of redeeming the first-born of a man: To redeem the first-born of man; as it is a commandment upon every man in Israel to redeem, from the priest, his son who is the firstborn to his Israelite mother - as it is stated (Numbers 18:15), "but you shall redeem the first-born of man." Elsewhere we find that the Torah makes being firstborn dependent on exiting the womb, as it it is stated in the Order of Bo el Pharaoh (Exodus 13:2), "all the first-born, all that exit the womb of the Children of Israel - whether man or beast - is Mine." And the meaning of exit the womb is opening the womb, meaning who was the first to open the womb of the mother. And because of this, they, may their memory be blessed, said (Bekhorot 46a) that one who is born after a stillborn - any stillborn for which the mother would be impure [as a result of it] - the one that comes after it is not a first-born to [be redeemed from] the priest, as the stillborn preceded him; but if the fetus [is not developed enough that] the mother [contracts] the impurity of birthing, the one that comes after it is a first-born. In Tractate Niddah (Niddah 21a) this distinction is elucidated, and likewise in Tractate Bekhorot (Bekhorot 46a) is elucidated which first-born children are considered first for the priest and not for inheritance, and which are first for inheritance but not for the priest. It also said there that there is a firstborn for everything and one that is not a firstborn for [even] one of them.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy