Midrash for Genesis 49:9
גּ֤וּר אַרְיֵה֙ יְהוּדָ֔ה מִטֶּ֖רֶף בְּנִ֣י עָלִ֑יתָ כָּרַ֨ע רָבַ֧ץ כְּאַרְיֵ֛ה וּכְלָבִ֖יא מִ֥י יְקִימֶֽנּוּ׃
Judah is a lion’s whelp; From the prey, my son, thou art gone up. He stooped down, he couched as a lion, And as a lioness; who shall rouse him up?
Midrash Tanchuma
Similarly, Judah will also be Esau’s adversary, as it is stated: And the lion shall eat straw like the ox (Isa. 11:7). Lion refers to Judah, as is said: Judah is a lion’s whelp (Gen. 49:9), and like the ox alludes to Joseph. Will eat straw informs us that Joseph will judge Esau, who is referred to as straw, and his descendants will be like straw, as it is said: And the house of Esau is like straw (Obad. 18).1The two tribes, identified as animals, will consume the straw representing Esau. Whence do we know that all the others will likewise judge Esau? From the verse How was thy mother a lioness; among lions she couched (Ezek. 19:2). We learn (from this verse) that all Israel will judge Esau.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition)
(Ib. 1, 15) And the King of Egypt said to the Hebrew midwives. Raba and Samuel both explain this passage: The former said: "It was a mother and a daughter," the latter said: "It was a mother-in-law and daughter-in-law." The one who interprets it as a mother and daughter refers to Jochebed and Miriam and the other who means a daughter-in-law and mother-in-law refers to Jochebed and Elisheba. We find a Baraitha that is in accordance with the one who explains it as the daughter and mother; for we are taught in the following Baraitha, Shifra refers to Jochebed. Why her name Shifra? Because she smoothened the limbs of the infant. It may be explained in another way; because Israel multiplied itself during her days Puah refers to Miriam. Why was she called Puah? Because she would speak to the infant [and play with it] in order to pacify it. Another explanation might be given to it, because she spoke through a Holy Inspiration and said: "My mother is destined to give birth to a son who will save Israel." (Ib., ib. 16) And He said: "When do the office of a midwife to the Hebrew women you shall have due regard upon the birth." What does that mean? Said R. Jochanan: "He gave them a great sign [how to recognize the time of a woman when she is about to give birth to a child]." (Ib., ib., ib.) If it be a son, then shall ye kill him; but if it be a daughter then shall she live. Said R. Chaninah: "An important sign did Pharaoh reveal unto the midwives; the birth of a son comes with the face downward, while the birth of a daughter comes with the face upward." (Ib., ib. 17) But the midwives feared God and they did not do as the king of Egypt commanded them, but they saved the male children. We are taught that not only did they not kill the male children but they would supply them with water and food in order to sustain them. (Ib., ib. 19) And the midwives said unto Pharaoh, because the Hebrew women are not as the Egyptian; for they are Chayoth. What is the meaning of Chayoth? Should we say that they are midwives themselves, does not a midwife need another midwife for her own giving birth? We must therefore say, they said to him: "This nation (Israel) is likened unto beasts. Juda, as is said (Gen. 49, 9) Like a lion's welp, O Juda; (Ib., ib. 17) Dan shall be a serpent by the way. (Ib., ib., 21) Maphthali is like a fleet hind, (Ib., ib, 14) Yesachar is a strong-boned ass, (Deut. 33, 17) Joseph, as first born steer is adorned with glory. (Gen 49, 27) Benjamin shall be as a wolf that rendeth. Concerning the above it is written in detail what they are and concerning the rest of the tribes, it is written in general (Ez. 19, 2) And so, what a noble lioness was thy mother! among lions did she lie down amidst lions did she raise her whelps."
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Midrash Tanchuma Buber
Another interpretation (of Gen. 44:18): THEN JUDAH DREW NEAR UNTO HIM. This text is related (to Job 41:8 [16]): ONE IS SO NEAR TO THE OTHER THAT NO AIR CAN COME BETWEEN THEM. This refers to Judah and Joseph, for in whatever Joseph prided himself, Judah came and vanquished, as stated (in Gen. 45:1): JOSEPH COULD NOT RESTRAIN HIMSELF. To what were they comparable?9Tanh., Gen. 11:3. To a bull that went out; and, when all the beasts fled from him, he kicked (rt.: B'T) at one and gored at another. Then came the lion, but he did not stand up to him. Rather, when the lion appeared and sought out the bull, he was not to be found. So Joseph is likened to the bull, as stated (in Deut. 33:17): LIKE A FIRSTLING BULL HE HAS MAJESTY. The tribes also have been likened to beasts, and Joseph was priding himself as being over them and despising (rt.: B'T) them. (According to Gen. 42:7) HE BECAME A STRANGER TO THEM. Then goring at a particular one, (according to Gen. 42:24) HE TOOK SIMON FROM THEM. He acted so only until the lion came, < for > (according to Gen. 49:24) JUDAH IS A LION'S WHELP. He sought him out as the bull, but he was not to be found. Rather (according to Gen. 45:1): JOSEPH COULD NOT RESTRAIN HIMSELF. Why? (Prov. 30:30:) THE LION IS THE MIGHTIEST AMONG THE BEASTS, AND RETREATS BEFORE NONE, even because it is written of him (in Gen. 47:12): AND < JOSEPH > SUSTAINED < HIS FATHER AND HIS BROTHERS >.10One would expect some saying about Judah. Buber’s note here suggests that SUSTAINED be read as two words, apart from the biblical context, and interpreted as “All in all,” i.e., the lion is “all in all” in the world of beasts. Cf. Tanh., Gen. 11:3: “Who has stood facing a bull? The lion, as stated (Gen. 44:18): THEN JUDAH DREW NEAR UNTO HIM.” Also in the world to come a fighting Messiah is going to arise from Joseph, but a Messiah who is to arise from Judah will be stronger than he, as stated (in Zech. 10:6): I WILL STRENGTHEN THE HOUSE OF JUDAH, < BUT THE HOUSE OF JOSEPH I WILL SAVE >.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy