Talmud for Exodus 22:27

In Lord of lords,²¹Deut. 10, 17. the first is sacred and the second is secular; in the God of Abraham²²Gen. 31, 53. it is sacred; in the God of Nahor²³ibid.; Nahor did not worship the true God. it is secular; in the God of their father²⁴ibid.; Terah (their father) was an idolater. it is secular. In Thou shalt not revile God²⁵Ex. 22, 27. [the noun may bear] a sacred or secular meaning.²⁶It may denote God or judges. R. Simeon maintains that the noun is sacred.²⁷V inserts ‘as it says’ within brackets, the words being redundant. [H omits and reads ‘Ishmael’ instead of ‘Simeon’.] In Forasmuch as I have seen thy face, as one seeth the face of God²⁸Gen. 33, 10. the noun is secular;²⁹Because it refers to an angel or prince. in God’s camp³⁰ibid. XXXII, 3. the noun is sacred.

In For the Lord your God, He is God of gods,¹³Deut. 10, 17. the first [two]¹⁴i.e. your God He is God. are sacred and the last¹⁵Of gods, signifying ‘judges’ or ‘princes’. is secular. In Lord of lords,¹⁶ibid. the first is sacred and the second secular. In the God of Abraham¹⁷Gen. 31, 53. it is sacred; in the god of Nahor¹⁸ibid. Nahor did not worship the true God. it is secular, and in the god of their father¹⁹ibid. Terah (their father) was an idolater. it is secular. In Thou shalt not revile God,²⁰Ex. 22, 27. [the noun may bear] a sacred or a secular meaning.²¹It may refer to God or judges. R. Ishmael²²In Sof. IV, 5, ‘R. Simeon’. maintains that the noun is sacred.

Rebbi Yose bar Ḥanina said, for the first basket he transgresses a commandment, for the second a commandment and a prohibition. For the first basket he transgresses a commandment since he gave both names simultaneously¹⁰⁶Mishnah Terumot 3:7 states that the First Tithe is called “beginning” since it contains heave of the tithe, but the Second Tithe is never called “beginning.” Hence, the beginning should precede the non-beginning., and for the second a commandment and a prohibition since he gave both names simultaneously and he put the Second Tithe of the first basket before the First Tithe of the second basket¹⁰⁷In the parallel in Babli Temurah4a/b, both R. Yose bar Ḥanina and R. Eleazar agree that declaring the Second Tithe before the First is a violation. R. Yose bar Ḥanina holds that transgressing a prohibition by words alone is not punishable in criminal law while R. Eleazar declares it punishable..