Midrash sobre Daniel 3:12

There was a certain Jew in Shushan, the capital — a Benjamite. What can be the reason for giving such a genealogy? If for the mere genealogy then it should have been traced to Benjamin, son of Israel; why then were only the first three of his ancestors mentioned? In a Baraitha it is explained that: All the three names are not those of his ancestors, but are his own. The son of Yair, the son who caused to enlighted the eyes of Israel with his prayer; the son of Shimi, the son whose prayer God heard; the son of Kish, the son who knocked at the gates of Mercy, and they were opened to him." It is written, A Judean man, and then, A Benjamite. What was he? Rabba b. b. Cahana, in the name of R. Joshua b. Levi, said: "His father was a Benjamite and his mother was a Judean." The sages, however, said: "The tribes disputed with each other. Juda said, 'Through me Modrecai was born, for if David had killed Shimi ben Gera he could not have been born'; and Benjamin said, 'He belongs to me, because he is of my tribe.'" Raba said: "On the contrary, the Congregation of Israel said, 'See what Juda did to me, and see what the Benjamites have done to me; Juda (Fol. 13) because David did not kill Shimi, he made possible the birth of Mordecai, of whom Haman became jealous; and because Saul did not kill Agag, Haman, who caused troubles for Israel, was born.' " R. Jochanan said: "He was indeed a Benjamite, but why is he called a Judean? Because he did not want to worshop idols, and every Israelite who rejects idols is called a Judean, as it is said (Dan. 10, 12) There are certain Judean men … Thy gods they do not worship."