Midrash sobre Exodo 40:17

(Numb. 3:4:) “And they had no children.” R. Jacob bar Abin said in the name of R. Aha, “If they had had children, they would have taken precedence over Eleazar and Ithamar, since whoever takes precedence with respect to inheritance takes precedence with respect to honor, provided that he follows the behavior of his forebears.”⁵⁰PRK 26(27):10; Lev. R. 20:11; Numb. R. 2:26. (Ibid.:) “So Eleazar and Ithamar served as priests in the presence of ('al-pene) their father Aaron.” R. Isaac said, “During his lifetime”; but R. Hiyya bar Abba said, “At his death.” According to the opinion of R. Isaac, who said, “During his lifetime,” 'al-pene is mentioned here, and pene is also mentioned elsewhere (in Gen. 11:28), “And Haran died in the lifetime of ('al-pene) his father Terah.” If pene as used elsewhere (i.e., in Gen. 11:28) [means] during his lifetime, pene as used here (in Numb. 3:4) also [means] during his lifetime. According to the opinion of R. Hiyya bar Abba, who said, “At his death,” pene is used here (in Numb. 3:4) and pene is used elsewhere (in Gen. 23:3), “Then Abraham arose from beside ('al-pene) his dead (i.e., his dead wife).” If pene as used elsewhere (in Gen. 23:3) [means] at his death, pene as used here (in Numb. 3:4) also [means] at his death. Now according to the opinion of R. Isaac, who said, “during his lifetime,” [when] uncleanness befell Aaron, Eleazar ministered; [when] uncleanness befell Eleazar, Ithamar ministered. There is a story about Simeon ben Gimhit,⁵¹He was high priest in 17-18 C.E. that he went out to speak with the king of the Arabians.⁵²TYoma 4(3):20; yYoma 1:1 (38d); yMeg. 1:12(10) (72a); yHor. 3:3/5(2) (47d): Yoma 47a; ARN, A 35:4. When a streak of saliva squirted from [the king's] mouth onto his clothes and rendered him unclean, his brother Judah entered and ministered in the high priesthood in his place. That day Gimhit saw two of her sons as high priests. They said, “Gimhit had seven sons, and all of them ministered in the high priesthood.” The sages entered her home and said to her, “Tell us what good deeds you have to your credit?” She said to them, “By the Temple service, the rafters of my house have never seen the hair of my head.” They say, “All flours (qimhayya) are flour (qimhin), but the flour of Gimhit is fine flour.” In reference to her they read this verse (Ps. 45:14), “All glorious is the king's daughter within; her clothing is of gold brocade.” Now according to the opinion of R. Hiyya bar Abba, who said, “At his death,” when Aaron died, Eleazar ministered; when Eleazar died, Ithamar served in his place. R. Abba bar Abbina said, “For what reason is the parashah [about the death of] of Miriam (Numb. 20:1) near the parashah of the ashes of the [red] heifer (Numb. 19:1ff.)?⁵³PRK 26(27):11; Lev. R. 20:12; yYoma 1:1 (38b); MQ 28a. Simply to teach that just as the ashes of the [red] heifer atones, so does the death of the righteous atone.” R. Judan said, “For what reason is the death of Aaron (Deut. 10:6) near the breaking of the tablets (Deut. 9:17)? To teach that the death of the righteous is as grievous to the Holy One, blessed be He, as the breaking of the tablets.” R. Hiyya bar Abba said, “The sons of Aaron died on the first of Nisan.⁵⁴According to Lev. 10:1, they died at the time of the dedication of the Tabernacle; and according to Exod. 40:17, the dedication began with its erection on the first day of the first month, i.e., on the first of Abib, which came to be called Nisan. For what reason does it mention their death on the Day of Atonement (in Lev. 16:1)? It is simply to teach that, just as the Day of Atonement atones, so does the death of the righteous atone.” And where is it shown that the Day of Atonement atones? Where it is stated (in Lev. 16:30), “For on this day atonement shall be made for you to cleanse you.” And where it is shown that the death of the righteous atones? Where it is stated (in II Sam. 21:14), “Then they buried the bones of Saul […] and God responded to the plea of the land thereafter.”

How many were skilled but could not erect the Tabernacle?³¹Exod. R. 52:4. Solomon said (in Prov. 31:29): MANY DAUGHTERS HAVE DONE VALIANTLY, <BUT YOU SURPASS THEM ALL>. Why? Because they built the Tabernacle but did not know how to set it up. Each and everyone took his work and went to Moses. Each and every one would say: Here is my hook. Here is my board. Here is my bolt. But the Holy Spirit rested upon Moses, and he erected the tabernacle. Still you should not say <that> Moses <did it>. Rather The Tabernacle arose by itself, as stated (in Exod. 40:17): THE TABERNACLE WAS ERECTED. And you should not speak of the Tabernacle < alone being automatically erected >, but also of the Universal House (i.e., the Temple).³²On the Temple erecting itself, see Numb. R. 14:3; PR 6:7. Had it not been for the Holy One helping, neither Solomon nor all Israel would have built it. Where is it shown? Where David says so (in Ps. 127:1): UNLESS THE LORD BUILDS THE HOUSE, [THE BUILDERS' LABOR ON IT IN VAIN]. Therefore, the Tabernacle was erected through work of miracles. As soon as that Tabernacle was erected, all Israel began to rejoice, as stated (in Cant. 3:11): O DAUGHTERS OF ZION, GO FORTH AND GAZE AT KING SOLOMON (rt.: ShLM), <i.e.> at the king to whom peace (rt.: ShLM) belongs, i.e., the Supreme King of Kings, the Holy One. (Ibid., cont.:) [IN THE CROWN WITH WHICH HIS MOTHER CROWNED HIM, for the < verse here> is calling the Tabernacle a crown. Just as this crown is described, so was the Tabernacle described (e.g., in Exod. 36:35): BLUE AND PURPLE.³³These words also appear with reference to the Tabernacle in Exod. 25:4; 26:1, 31, 36; 27:16; 35:6, 23; 36:8, 37; 38:18. Cf. II Chron. 3:14, which uses the words with reference to the Temple. Nowhere do these words refer to a crown, but cf. Numb. R. 12:8, and Cant. R. 3:11:2 which maintain that the Tabernacle was like a crown because it was set with various elements like blue and purple which one would expect to find in a crown. See also Exod. 28:6, 8, 15, 33; 39: 1–2, 5, 8, 24, 29 where the high-priestly breast plate, the ephod, and various other articles of priestly clothing all have BLUE AND PURPLE.

Come and learn! From the following Baraitha: "On the fourteenth day of the month of Nisan, during which (month) the Israelites went out of Egypt, they killed the Passover sacrifice, and on the fifteenth day they went out. On this eve the first-born (of the Egyptians) were slain." How can you think that the plague of the first-born took place the night following Israel's exodus? We must therefore say that it refers to the previous night [following the fourteenth]. "That day (the fifteenth) was the fifth of the week." Since the fifteenth of Nisan was on the fifth day of the week, we must certainly say that the first day of Iyar (the following month), fell on the Sabbath; and the first of Sivan (the succeeding month) fell on the first day of the week: this then is in contradiction to the opinion of the Rabbis [who hold that the first day of Sivan of that year occurred on the second day of the week]. The Rabbis might explain this that the month of Iyar was an intercallary month [thus making the first of Sivan to be declared on the second day of the week]. Come and learn! And it came to pass in the first month in the same year, on the first of the month, that the Tabernacle was put up (Ex. 40. 17). We are taught: "That day was crowned tenfold; it was the first day of the creation; the first of the days on which the first prince presented his offerings on the altar [at the dedication of the Tabernacle]; the first of the days on which the Priests (Aaron and his sons) did their work in the Tabernacle; the first day on which the offering [of the congregational sacrifices] took place in the Tabernacle; the first day on which the Heavenly fire descended upon the altar [devouring the offerings]; the first day on which the priests were permitted to eat the sacrifices in the Tabernacle; the first day on which the Shechina appeared in the Sanctuary; the first day on which the High Priest blessed the children of Israel in the Tabernacle; the first day on which sacrifices upon elevated places were prohibited; and the first day of the first of the month." Now, if the first day of Nisan of that year was on the first day of the week, we must conclude that the first Nisan of the preceeding year fell on the fourth day of the week for thus have we been taught: "Acherim say that there can be no more than four days difference between the Feast of Weeks of one year and the Feast of Weeks of another year; between one New Year's day and another; and if a leap year should intervene, then there may be a difference of five days." According to this, we must conclude that the first day of the month of lyar fell on the sixth day of the week, and the first day of the month of Sivan fell on the Sabbath. Hence this contradicts both the Rabbis and R. Jose. Aye, according to R. Jose, there were seven short months [of twenty-nine days] (Fol. 88a) in that year [making a difference between that year and the previous one of but three days], and according to the Rabbis there were eight short months [consequently the difference between that year and the preceding year was a matter of but two days, and the first day of the month of lyar of that year fell on a Friday].

R. Abba bar Abbina said: For what reason is the parashah on < the death of > Miriam (Numb. 20:1) near the parashah on the ashes of the < red > heifer (Numb. 19:1ff.)?⁵⁶Tanh., Lev. 6:7; PRK 26(27):11; Lev. R. 20:12; yYoma 1:1 (38b); MQ 28a. Simply to teach that just as the ashes of the < red > heifer atones, so does the death of the righteous atone. R. [Judan] said: For what reason is the death of Aaron (Deut. 10:6) near the breaking of the tablets (Deut. 9:17)? To teach that the death of the righteous is as grievous to the Holy One as the breaking of the tablets. R. Hiyya bar Abba said: The sons of Aaron died on the first of Nisan.⁵⁷According to Lev. 10:1, they died at the time of the dedication of the Tabernacle; and according to Exod. 40:17, the dedication began with its erection on the first day of the first month, i.e., on the first of Abib, which came to be called Nisan. Why does it mention their death on the Day of Atonement (in Lev. 16:1)? {He said to him:} [It is simply] to teach that, just as the Day of Atonement atones, so does the death of the righteous atone. And where is it shown that the Day of Atonement atones? Where it is stated (in Lev. 16:30): FOR ON THIS DAY ATONEMENT SHALL BE MADE FOR YOU TO CLEANSE YOU. And where it is shown that the death of the righteous atones? Where it is stated (in II Sam. 21:14): THEN THEY BURIED THE BONES OF SAUL…. AND GOD RESPONDED TO THE PLEA OF THE LAND THEREAFTER.

14) (Vayikra 9:1): "And it was on the eighth day": the eighth day of the consecration of Aaron and his sons. — But perhaps the eighth day of the month is being referred to! — (This cannot be, for) it is written (Shemoth 40:17): "And it was in the first month of the second year on the first of the month that the mishkan was set up" — whereby we are taught that the mishkan was set up on Rosh Chodesh (Nissan). I might think that it was set up on Rosh Chodesh and the shechinah reposed upon it on the eighth of the month; it is, therefore, written (Bamidbar 9:15): "And on the day that the mishkan was erected, the cloud covered the mishkan) — whereby we are taught that on the very day that the mishkan was set up the shechinah reposed on the handiwork of Aaron. For all of the (first) seven days of the miluim Moses served (as high-priest) and the shechinah did not repose (there) through him — until Aaron came (on the eighth day) and ministered in the vestments of the high-priesthood and the shechinah reposed (there) through him, as it is written thereof (Vayikra 9:4): "For today the L–rd will appear to you."

This is one of the three things to which Moses devoted himself: the law, judgeships and Israel. R. Hiyya the son of Yosé said: Moses also was deeply involved in the building of the Tabernacle. And it is called by his name. R. Hiyya the son of Yosé said: Throughout the seven days of consecration, Moses took apart the Tabernacle twice each day and then assembled it. The elder R. Hiyya said: He did it three times each day, for it is said: Thou shalt rear up (Exod. 40:1), The Tabernacle was reared up (ibid., v. 17), and Moses reared up the Tabernacle (ibid., v. 18).

(Bamidbar 7:1) "And it was on the day that Moses had finished setting up the mishkan" (the tabernacle): Scripture here apprises us that all the seven days of consecration Moses would assemble the mishkan every morning and anoint it and dismantle it, and on that day (the eighth) he set it up and anointed it and assembled it and did not dismantle it. R. Yossi b. R. Yehudah says: On the eighth day, too, he anointed it and dismantled it. And it is written (Shemot 40:17) "And it was, in the first month (Nissan) in the second year, on the first day of the month that the mishkan was established — whence we derive that on the twenty-third of Adar Aaron and his sons began to anoint the mishkan and all of its vessels; on Rosh Chodesh (Nissan) it was established; on the second (of Nissan) the red heifer was burned; on the third, its waters were sprinkled (viz. Bamidbar 8:7). On that day (Rosh Chodesh Nissan), the Shechinah reposed in the house, as it is written (Shemot 40:35) "And Moses could not enter the tent of meeting, etc." On that day the chiefs (of the tribes) sacrificed their offerings, as it is written (Bamidbar 7:12) "And the one who presented his offering on the first day…" Why (emphasize) "the first day"? It was the first of all the days of the year. On that day fire descended from heaven and consumed the offerings, as it is written (Vayikra 9:24) "And a fire came forth from before the L-rd and consumed upon the altar the burnt-offering and the fats." On that day the sons of Aaron presented a strange fire, as it is written (Vayikra 10:1) "And Nadav and Avihu the sons of Aaron took, each his censer … (2) and they died before the L-rd." Their death was "before the L-rd," and their falling was outside. How did they leave (the inner sanctum)? R. Yossi was wont to say: An angel propped them dead until they left and they fell in the azarah (the court), as it is written (Ibid. 4) "Draw near and bear your brethren from before the sanctuary out of the camp." It is not written "from before the L-rd," but "from before the sanctuary." R. Yishmael says: It is derived from the verse itself — "and they died before the L-rd" — that their death was within (the sanctuary) and their falling was within. How did they leave? They dragged them out with iron hooks." (Bamidbar 7:1) "and he anointed it and consecrated it and all of its vessels": I might think that they were anointed and consecrated one by one. It is, therefore, written (Ibid.) "and he anointed them and consecrated them" — he did not consecrate one of them until all of them had been anointed. "and he anointed them": from inside and from outside. R. Yoshiyah says: Wet-measure vessels were anointed inside and outside, and dry-measure vessels, on the inside only, but not on the outside. R. Yonathan says: Wet-measure vessels were anointed on the inside but not on the outside, and dry-measure vessels were anointed neither on the inside nor on the outside. Know this to be so, that they were not anointed, it being written (Vayikra 23:17) "From your dwellings shall you bring two wave loaves. Two-tenths of fine flour shall they be … they shall be baked as firstlings to the L-rd." When are they "to the L-rd"? After they have been baked. Rebbi says: "and he anointed them and consecrated them": Why is this stated? Is it not already written "and he anointed it and consecrated it"? We are hereby apprised that with the anointment of these, all the future vessels were consecrated (i.e., they did not require prior anointment).