יַ֣יִן וְשֵׁכָ֞ר אַל־תֵּ֣שְׁתְּ ׀ אַתָּ֣ה ׀ וּבָנֶ֣יךָ אִתָּ֗ךְ בְּבֹאֲכֶ֛ם אֶל־אֹ֥הֶל מוֹעֵ֖ד וְלֹ֣א תָמֻ֑תוּ חֻקַּ֥ת עוֹלָ֖ם לְדֹרֹתֵיכֶֽם׃
<span class="x" onmousemove="Show('perush','Este es el <b>73er Precepto Negativo</b> enumerado por el Rambam en el Prefacio a Mishné Torá, su “Compendio de la Ley Hebrea” para todo el Pueblo de Israel.',event);" onmouseout="Close();">Tú, y tus hijos contigo, no beberéis vino ni embriagante</span>, cuando hubiereis de entrar en el tabernáculo del testimonio, porque no muráis: estatuto perpetuo por vuestras generaciones;
Tur HaArokh
אחרי מות שני בני אהרן, “After the death of two of Aaron’s sons.” The reason why the Torah again refers to this event at this juncture is that seeing the Torah had just (15,31) concluded by warning us to be extremely careful not to become guilty of death through polluting G’d’s residence while entering it in a state of ritual contamination, the Torah uses the death of Aaron’s sons as an example designed to serve as a deterrent to anyone else daring to desecrate consecrated grounds in such a fashion. Nachmanides adds that the wording אחרי מות שני בני אהרן is that immediately after that tragic death had occurred, Aaron and his sons had been warned not to enter consecrated grounds while in a state of intoxication. (Compare Leviticus 10,8-11). It is certainly reasonable to assume that these laws were revealed to Aaron and the people on the day following the death of Nadav and Avihu. They could not very well have been communicated on the very day of the death of the sons, as the legal status of אנינות, preoccupation with burial and mourning rites, prevent the remaining two sons from studying Torah on that day. Not only that, but the Holy Spirit does not communicate with people when they are in such a state of mind. The warning not to drink wine applied to Aaron personally more than to anyone else, as he performed service in the Tabernacle on a daily basis. Moses had been informed before now, of course, but the Torah wanted that the entire people be warned at once. [We must remember that though Moses had been given all these laws already on Mount Sinai, seeing that at that time the whole subject of building a Tabernacle had not yet become relevant, as there had not yet been the sin of the golden calf, there had also been no reason to reveal this to the people until now, the first or second day that the Tabernacle had become operative. Ed.] As a general rule (Nachmanides writing), whenever the Torah departs from chronological sequence in its report, it prefaces such statements with the words “G’d spoke to Moses at Mount Sinai, etc.,” to remind us that the legislation following was not an afterthought. Ed.] Our sages claim that the meaning of the words ולא תמותו in Leviticus 10,9 was an oblique reference to the reason why the two sons of his had died. Aaron should take care that the same would not happen to him. [Seeing that the author does not attribute this statement of “our sages” to a specific source, I permit myself the comment that this sounds incredibly unlikely, as surely someone of Aaron’s stature did not need to be given this kind of a warning in order to obey G’d’s instructions. Ed.]
Or HaChaim
Furthermore, the Torah had to avoid the comparison of this legislation with Leviticus 10,9 where the Torah commanded that the priests were not to enter the Tabernacle while intoxicated. In that instance the legislation was phrased as applicable only in connection with the priests entering the precincts of the Tabernacle drunk when they were about to perform the sacrificial service. The impression left was that at times when the priests were not engaged in service they were free to indulge in wine and alcohol. It would have been easy to deduce from there that when the priests were not about to engage in sacrificial service they are at liberty to defile themselves. The Torah used the singular when legislating this commandment to make it clear that the priests are not to defile themselves at any time, except for the occasions listed in subsequent verses. This teaches that the prohibition for a priest to defile himself is totally unconnected to the Temple-service and its requirements. The Temple-service, after all, is not in danger of becoming defunct due to the temporary impurity of a single priest. The duty of the priest to remain in a state of ritual purity is one that devolves upon him independent of any consideration for the function he can perform only while in such a state.
Kli Yakar
Another explanation of ki yafli is that it means separation and removal. This can be explained in three ways. The first is that through wine one cannot separate holy and profane, as it is written Do not drink wine or strong drink (Leviticus 10:9-10) and adjacent to it, to differentiate between holy and profane. Therefore it says ki yafli — when one wishes to separate holy and profane, then he should abstain from wine lest he drinks and forgets what is decreed by the Torah (Proverbs 31:5). This excludes women who are not obligated in Torah study, so the language of “haflaa” [separation] does not apply to them.
The second explanation is that it refers to separation from the pleasures of this world, of which wine is foremost, as explained regarding Manoach when it says, Why do you ask my name, seeing it is extraordinary [peli] (Judges 13:18). That is, his name is “Peli” because every angel is named according to his mission, and “I was sent to make the born child a Nazir, extraordinary and separated from all matters of this world.” And because it says ish ki yafli [when a man sets himself apart], therefore I am called “Peli.”
And therefore it says “ki yafli” [singular] and not “yafliu” [plural] because even a woman’s vow depends on her husband, as it is written Any vow to afflict the soul, her husband may uphold it or her husband may annul it (Numbers 30:14). Therefore, her vow also depends on her husband. And the intention of this Naziriteship is not that one should abstain from wine for 30 days and then return to being among the drunkards as before, for if so, what has the righteous person accomplished? Rather, the intention is that one should gradually accustom oneself, for all beginnings are difficult, and in 30 days it becomes an established habit, so that afterwards one will not be so eager for it.
The third explanation follows what our Sages said (Nedarim 22a), “One who makes a vow is as if he built a high place [bamah],” etc. You will find a very precious explanation of this statement later in Parashat Matot (30:3), see there. This agrees with the opinion that the Nazir is called a sinner (Nedarim 10a), and the sin is that he builds a high place for himself and separates himself from the entire world by practicing prohibition in a matter that everyone else practices as permitted. Therefore it says “ki yafli” — because he wants to be distinct and separated from others and builds a high place for himself. This is not common among women because they presumably do this [become Nazirites] because they see a wayward woman [sotah] in her disgrace, not in order to build a high place for themselves.
The second explanation is that it refers to separation from the pleasures of this world, of which wine is foremost, as explained regarding Manoach when it says, Why do you ask my name, seeing it is extraordinary [peli] (Judges 13:18). That is, his name is “Peli” because every angel is named according to his mission, and “I was sent to make the born child a Nazir, extraordinary and separated from all matters of this world.” And because it says ish ki yafli [when a man sets himself apart], therefore I am called “Peli.”
And therefore it says “ki yafli” [singular] and not “yafliu” [plural] because even a woman’s vow depends on her husband, as it is written Any vow to afflict the soul, her husband may uphold it or her husband may annul it (Numbers 30:14). Therefore, her vow also depends on her husband. And the intention of this Naziriteship is not that one should abstain from wine for 30 days and then return to being among the drunkards as before, for if so, what has the righteous person accomplished? Rather, the intention is that one should gradually accustom oneself, for all beginnings are difficult, and in 30 days it becomes an established habit, so that afterwards one will not be so eager for it.
The third explanation follows what our Sages said (Nedarim 22a), “One who makes a vow is as if he built a high place [bamah],” etc. You will find a very precious explanation of this statement later in Parashat Matot (30:3), see there. This agrees with the opinion that the Nazir is called a sinner (Nedarim 10a), and the sin is that he builds a high place for himself and separates himself from the entire world by practicing prohibition in a matter that everyone else practices as permitted. Therefore it says “ki yafli” — because he wants to be distinct and separated from others and builds a high place for himself. This is not common among women because they presumably do this [become Nazirites] because they see a wayward woman [sotah] in her disgrace, not in order to build a high place for themselves.