וַיֹּאמְר֗וּ הֲרַ֤ק אַךְ־בְּמֹשֶׁה֙ דִּבֶּ֣ר יְהוָ֔ה הֲלֹ֖א גַּם־בָּ֣נוּ דִבֵּ֑ר וַיִּשְׁמַ֖ע יְהוָֽה׃
Y dijeron: ¿Solamente por Moisés ha hablado SEÑOR? ¿no ha hablado también por nosotros? Y oyólo SEÑOR.
Rashi
Speaks through me. He bestowed His holy spirit on me and spoke through me. Whenever [the verse refers] to prophecy, the word דִּבֵּר is appropriate as [we find] "Did [Adonoy] only speak to Moshe, He also spoke to us."4Bamidbar 12:2. "I will speak through him."5Ibid 12:6. The reason for it is because the spirit enters into the prophet and speaks through him.
Kli Yakar
“And he shall not be like Korah and his congregation, etc.” Rashi explains that he will not be afflicted with tzara’at like Moses was afflicted with tzara’at on his hand (Sanhedrin 110a), and the word lo [to him] refers to one who disputes the priesthood. Here the child asks: What is the connection between Moses’ tzara’at and one who disputes the priesthood? It would have been more appropriate to bring as evidence Miriam’s tzara’at, which was similar in nature to Korah’s dispute, for his dispute over the priesthood stemmed from his challenge to Moses’ prophecy — the Lord has not sent you — and of this kind was Miriam’s tzara’at, as she said, Has the Lord spoken only through Moses? Has He not spoken through us as well? (Numbers 12:2). Similarly, Korah said, For all the congregation, all of them are holy (Numbers 16:3) — not only you alone heard at Mount Sinai, I am and You shall have no other gods. But what relevance does Moses’ hand afflicted with tzara’at have to Korah’s dispute?
Sforno
אם יהיה נביאכם, if Moses were a prophet on the same spiritual level as you presumed when you said: “G’d spoke to us also,”