Deuteronómio 24:19 Pasajes relacionados

כִּ֣י תִקְצֹר֩ קְצִֽירְךָ֨ בְשָׂדֶ֜ךָ וְשָֽׁכַחְתָּ֧ עֹ֣מֶר בַּשָּׂדֶ֗ה לֹ֤א תָשׁוּב֙ לְקַחְתּ֔וֹ לַגֵּ֛ר לַיָּת֥וֹם וְלָאַלְמָנָ֖ה יִהְיֶ֑ה לְמַ֤עַן יְבָרֶכְךָ֙ יְהוָ֣ה אֱלֹהֶ֔יךָ בְּכֹ֖ל מַעֲשֵׂ֥ה יָדֶֽיךָ׃

Cuando segares tu mies en tu campo, y olvidares alguna gavilla en el campo, <span class="x" onmousemove="Show('perush','Este es el <b>214to Precepto Negativo</b> enumerado por el Rambam en el Prefacio a Mishné Torá, su “Compendio de la Ley Hebrea” para todo el Pueblo de Israel.',event);" onmouseout="Close();">no volverás a tomarla</span>:&nbsp; para el extranjero, para el huérfano, y para la viuda será; porque te bendiga SEÑOR tu Dios en toda obra de tus manos.

Jerusalem Talmud Sotah

The argument of the rabbis seems inverted; there they say to exclude the hidden things62This refers to Mishnah Peah 6:9, Sifry Deut. 283, interpreting Deut. 24:19: If you cut your harvest on your field and you forget a sheaf on the field, you may not return to take it. R. Jehudah says, this excludes anything hidden, the Sages say this includes everything hidden. But in Deut. 21:1, on your field is interpreted as “not hidden in a heap,” excluding any hidden corpse., but here they say to include the hidden things. There, “your field,” in the open, to exclude that which is hidden; “your harvest,” in the open, to exclude that which is hidden. It is a restriction after a restriction63The principle that a restriction after a restriction is an extension is universally accepted in both Talmudim; in Horaiot 1:1 it is generalized to the statement that any sequence of restrictions of an even number of elements is an extension; for an odd number of elements it is a restriction. to add the hidden things. But here, “on the land,” not floating on the water.
Preguntar a un rabinoBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Peah

How does it work out108What is the practical difference between R. Eleazar who treats the oversized sheaf as sheaf and the Tanna who treats it as a stack?? If he forgot one sheaf next to it, if you make it a sheaf, everybody agrees that it is “forgotten sheaf.109Then you have two sheaves which for everybody are subject to “forgotten sheaves.”” If you make it a stack, a difference between Shammai and Hillel110This should read: the Houses of Shanmai and Hillel. The House of Shammai in Mishnah 6:2 freed the sheaf next to a stack from “forgotten sheaves;” the House of Hillel did not.. If he forgot two sheaves, if you make it sheaves, a difference between the Houses of Shammai and Hillel111For the House of Hillel, one has three sheaves and it is an exempted row; for the House of Shammai one would need four.; if you make it a stack it will not be considered a row112Then one only has two sheaves which even for the House of Hillel are not a row..
Preguntar a un rabinoBookmarkShareCopy