Levítico 20:9 Pasajes relacionados

“If he injured both of them at the same time or cursed them at the same time, he is guilty. Rebbi Jehudah frees him.”¹⁷²In the Babylonian tradition, the position of R. Jehudah is uncertain; cf. Tosephta 12:7, readings of Erfurt ms. and editio princeps, and Babli 101a. Rebbi Joḥanan asked: Is not the argument of Rebbi Jehudah inverted? As we have stated there: ¹⁷³Mishnah Ḥulin 7:3, speaking of the sinew of the hip which is forbidden as food (Gen. 32:33). He ate from both sides but did not know which piece was from what side. For the majority it makes no difference since the sinews on both sides are forbidden. For R. Jehudah, the singular used in the verse, “the sinew of the hip” implies that only one is forbidden; in the opinion of the Babli this must be the one on the right hand side. The Yerushalmi must hold that R. Jehudah holds that clearly one of the two sinews is forbidden but it is not decided which one it is. R. Jehudah holds that since he certainly ate a piece of the forbidden sinew, he is guilty. Then the question is why should the eater be prosecutable when the prosecution could not show which piece was the forbidden one?“If he ate the volume of an olive of one of them and the volume of an olive of the other, he absorbs eighty [lashes]; Rebbi Jehudah says, he absorbs only forty [lashes].” Rebbi Crispus said, it is not inverted. There, it was in doubt what is forbidden. Here, it was certain¹⁷⁴If his mother had waited the prescribed three months, there never would have been any problem. but it became doubtful for him. Rebbi Judan asked: If it is so, in case carcass meat was mixed up with slaughtered meat, since it was certain but became doubtful for him, should he be free if he ate it¹⁷⁵Would R. Jehudah hold that a person who ate all of a portion of meat, of which it was known that it contained both kosher and non-kosher meat, could not be held responsible and would not have to bring a purification sacrifice?? Rebbi Yose said, Rebbi Jehudah agrees for all other prohibitions that he is (free)¹⁷⁶One has to read “guilty”. The text here is an erroneous copy from Halakhah 1 (Note 61).. But here, Rebbi Jehudah is interpreting verses: “His father,” certain but not uncertain, “his mother”, certain but not uncertain¹⁷⁷Sifra Qedošim Pereq 9(8), on Lev. 20:9..