Deuteronómio 12:6 Referencias del Talmud: Jerusalem Talmud Bikkurim, Jerusalem Talmud Rosh Hashanah, Jerusalem Talmud Chagigah & Jerusalem Talmud Orlah

HALAKHAH: “For heave and First Fruits,” etc. It is written (Num.18.8): “Behold, I gave to you the watch over My heaves.” Two heaves, heave and First Fruits⁷In the Babli (Šabbat25a, 26a; Yebamot 74a; and in slightly different form Bekhorot 34a), the two heaves are pure and impure (or pure and questionable), respectively. That tradition is in the name of the Davidic Rabba bar Abuha and may represent the autochthonous Babylonian tradition. In the Yerushalmi tradition, the verse determines the rules of First Fruits as those of heave.. About heave it is written⁸The paragraph deals with the prohibition of impure hallowed food. (Lev. 22:9): “They should not carry sin because of it and die if they desecrate it.” First fruits as it is written (Deut. 12:6): “There you shall bring your elevation offerings,” these are First Fruits, as it is written (Deut. 26:4): “The Cohen shall take the basket from your hand.⁹This statement is fragmentary and unintelligible in the form presented. The full text is in Sifry Deut.63: There you shall bring your elevation offerings, private and public, your well-being offerings, private and public, your tithes; R. Aqiba said, the verse deals with two different tithes, grain tithes and animal tithes, and your hand’s heaves, these are First Fruits, as it is written: The Cohen shall take the basket from your hand. Other heaves do not have to be brought to the Temple.” Maybe we should say that the verse¹⁰Lev. 22:9 which imposes death by the hand of Heaven for desecrators. refers to sacrifices? Extirpation is already written in regard to sacrifices¹¹Lev. 22:3 imposes the penalty of extirpation on any Cohen coming close to sacrifices while impure. Traditionally, extirpation is considered more of a punishment than death by the hand of Heaven..

It is written⁶¹Lev. 23:38., in addition to the Sabbaths of the Eternal, and in addition to your gifts, etc., which you will give to the Eternal. For I could think that on a holiday⁶²“Holiday” here always means “holiday of pilgrimage”, to exclude the High Holidays. one brings only the holiday sacrifices⁶³Since in general everything forbidden on the Sabbath is forbidden on a holiday except preparation of food.; from where that sacrifices by a single person or by a community which were dedicated for the holiday shall be brought on the holiday? The verse says, in addition to the Sabbaths of the Eternal, … which you will give to the Eternal⁶⁴“…” refers to your donations, all your vows, and all your voluntary gifts.. This refers to birds and flour offerings⁶⁵Which may be obligatory as reparation or purification offerings; for persons far from the Sanctuary they do not require an additional trip. Sifry Num. 152., to add all of them to be brought on the holiday. “I could think that this is voluntary; the verse says⁶⁶Num.29:39. “These” refer to in addition to your vows, and your voluntary gifts, your elevation offerings, and your flour offerings, and your libations, and your well-being offerings. The plural “your festive occasions” shows that for missing one holiday one cannot transgress “do not delay”; Babli 4b., these you shall do on your festive occasions, ‘these’ are established as duty, that all of them be brought on the holiday. I could think on any holiday of his choosing; the verse says⁶⁷Deut.12:5–6., you shall come there and bring there. If to permit, it already was permitted. If to establish, it already was established. Then why is it said, you shall come there and bring there? This refers to the first holiday which happens to come his way. I could think that one of these passed, he transgressed because ‘do not delay’? The verse says, these you shall do on your festive occasions; he does not transgress because of ‘do not delay’ until the holidays of a full year have passed by him⁶⁸The sentence is the last in the list of holiday sacrifices for the entire year. Sifry Deut.63.. Rebbi Simeon says three holidays in order. How is this? If he vowed before Passover, only if Passover, and Pentecost, and Tabernacles passed by him. If he vowed before Pentecost, only if Pentecost, and Tabernacles, and Passover, and Pentecost, and Tabernacles passed by him. If he vowed before Tabernacles, only if Tabernacles, and Passover, and Pentecost, and Tabernacles passed by him.”⁶⁹Sifra Emor Pereq15(1–4).
* Here starts an extensive Genizah fragment edited by L. Ginzberg (G).

They asked before Rebbi Ila, so far for a commandment. From where a prohibition? The verse says⁶⁷Deut.12:5–6., you shall come there and bring there. Where do we hold? If for a commandment, it already had been said⁶⁶Num.29:39. “These” refer to in addition to your vows, and your voluntary gifts, your elevation offerings, and your flour offerings, and your libations, and your well-being offerings. The plural “your festive occasions” shows that for missing one holiday one cannot transgress “do not delay”; Babli 4b.. But if it cannot refer to a commandment, refer it to a prohibition. *Does one transgress about a Pesaḥ sacrifice at its proper time⁷⁰If an animal was dedicated to be used as Pesaḥ and intentionally it was not used, it cannot be used the next year since it will be too old. It cannot be used as well-being sacrifice since it does not qualify under the rules spelled out in Pesaḥim. Therefore the three-holiday rule is not applicable in this case, and the three-holiday rule is not applicable in all cases. (The animal could be sold immediately for a sacrifice and the money used to buy an animal as well-being sacrifice to which the three-holiday rule would apply.)? It was found stated, about Pesaḥ sacrifice at its proper time one transgresses. If it were otherwise, what would we say? Rebbi Samuel, the son of Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun said, that you should not say that since if it was lost and found after the owner was exculpated, its body is brought as well-being offering⁷¹Mishnah Pesaḥim9:5, Note 82., therefore it was a question whether one transgresses about a Pesaḥ sacrifice at its proper time⁷²Since if the omission is not intentional the three-holiday rule would apply.. They asked before Rebbi Ze`ira, does one transgress between one holiday and the next<sup>73</sup>Since the obligation of actually bringing the sacrifice is restricted to the holiday week (in the case of Pentecost, which has no week, the holiday and the following six days.)? Rebbi Abba objected, was it not stated, a holiday offering which was not brought on the first shall be brought on the second; does one permit him to transgress<sup>74</sup>Therefore the question asked before R. Ze`ira has to be answered in the negative.? In addition from the following: You shall do⁷⁵Deut. 23:24; the source about vows in general., a positive commandment. Guard⁷⁵Deut. 23:24; the source about vows in general., a prohibition. Does he not transgress a positive commandment and a prohibition only after three holidays⁷⁶As established in the preceding paragraph.? Rebbi Abun in the name of the rabbis there: If one said, I take upon me the obligation to bring an elevation offering on Monday. Once Monday has passed and he did not bring it, he transgresses⁷⁷This is another case in which the three- holiday rule is inoperative. If a specific date was mentioned in the vow, once the date is passed the vow is not fulfilled.. If its year is complete you cast down the last day and he transgresses every single day⁷⁸This is a different case, similar to that of Pesaḥ. All animals destined for the altar have age limits. If an animal was vowed to the altar but its age limit was reached before it was sacrificed, the vow cannot be fulfilled anymore and is broken irrespective of the three-holiday rule.. If it is so, if three holidays have passed you cast down the last holiday and he transgresses every single holiday. Rebbi Abun bar Ḥiyya asked, if its year was completed on Pentecost, is it possible to say it is not qualified and he transgresses⁷⁹Since on the holiday itself only the holiday offerings may be slaughtered, and on the following days the animal already would be too old, the animal would have to be offered on the day preceding the holiday. (The same statement could have been made for any other holiday.)?