Talmud sobre Exodo 2:21

It was stated¹²¹The Babli, 10b, has a different collection of substitutes for “oath”.: šĕbutâ, šĕquqâ; Rebbi Ḥiyya stated: šĕbuqa, šĕqu‘â, šĕqurâ. “A vow”, when he made a vow by Moy, by the oath which Moses vowed, “and Moses accepted the curse.¹²²Ex. 2:21. “Moses swore to stay by the man,” not “Moses agreed to stay with the man,” cf. the Targumim.” Rebbi Jonah asked, why do we not say, by the oath which Saul vowed, “Saul menaced the people with a curse¹²³1S. 14:24. Why is the invocation of Saul’s name not a form of oath. In the verse quoted, the meaning of “imposing a curse by an oath” is clear and undisputed. There is no answer, probably because religious fear was never connected with the name of Saul. It is noteworthy that all through proto-Mishnaic, Mishnaic, and Talmudic periods the name Moses is not used for living persons; there are a few appearences of a substitute name such as Maishe.”? By my right hand, that is a vow, by my left hand, that is a vow¹²⁴In the Babli, 10b, only “right hand” is accepted.. Rebbi Mattaniah said, for it is written¹²⁵Dan. 12:7.: “He lifted his right hand and his left hand to the Heavens and swore by the Eternally Living.”