Jeremías 2:30 Referencias del Talmud: Jerusalem Talmud Nedarim, Jerusalem Talmud Gittin, Jerusalem Talmud Shabbat & Jerusalem Talmud Ketubot

⁷¹A somewhat different text is in Pesiqta rabbati 22 (ed. M. Friedmann p. 113a).Ḥizqiah said, he who swears that two are two is whipped for a vain oath. Rebbi Ḥaggai in the name of Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish: One who saw rain falling and said: “O Lord, inundate with much water⁷⁰In Šebuot, the reading is קוּרִי פָּלֻּי בּרֶיכּסוֹן which N. Brüll (Jahrbuch für jüdische Geschichte und Literatur 1, p. 130) reads as κύριε πολὺ βρέξον “o Lord, give abundant water”, as first verse of a prayer for rain. S. Lieberman, in a full discussion of this text (יונית ויונות בארץ ישראל, Jerusalem 1962, pp. 25–27), points out that the invocation of God’s name in a vain prayer is forbidden by the Third Commandment and that the characterization as “vow” is only a reference to that Commandment.”, is whipped for a vain oath. Rebbi Onias, Rebbi Jacob bar Abun in the name of Rebbi Samuel bar Naḥman: 24 city councils⁷²Greek βουλή. were in Judea and they all were destroyed because of true vain oaths, as it is written⁷³Jer. 2:30. Another version in Tanḥuma Maṭṭot 1, Vayiqra 7.: “For the vain did I hit your sons.”

HALAKHAH: “A widow can be paid from the orphans’ property only,” etc. Earlier they swore falsely and buried their children, since it is written⁵⁹Jer. 2:30. For the statement that children die for the parents’ sins of vows cf. Ketubot 7:7, Note 66.: “For vain [vows] I smote your children.” In addition, they fear vows more than oaths⁶⁰For example, there is an annual revocation rite, Kol Nidre, for vows with oaths only mentioned as an afterthought; cf. introduction to Tractate Nedarim, Note 4.. If she transgressed and swore? Rav Huna said, if she swore, she swore⁶¹If she swears on her own initiative to expedite the process, it is valid and she has to be paid. The same statement in the Babli, 35a.. Rav said to his daughter-in-law: If I were not a person readily making concessions, even the cover on your head would be my property. Samuel said, she acquires the garments which she is wearing⁶²The same disagreement, whether or not garments, which the husband has to supply during the marriage, are counted against the ketubah, is in the Babli Ketubot 54a.. A Mishnah supports Samuel: “Neither his wife’s garments nor his children’s are his property⁶³‘Arakhin 6:5. The family’s clothing cannot be counted as the husband’s property in bankruptcy proceedings. In the Babli, nevertheless practice is decided following Rav, against the Yerushalmi..”

HALAKHAH: “Because of three sins women die in childbirth,¹⁸⁶Quote from Mishnah 6.” etc. There are Tannaim who state, as children. There are Tannaim who state, in childbirth¹⁸⁷Babli 32a.. He who said as children, it was stated in the name of Rebbi Jehudah: Children die because of the sin of vows¹⁸⁸Babli 32b, Ketubot 72a.. What is the reason? For the vain I did hit your sons¹⁸⁹Jer. 2:30, cf. Nedarim 3:2, Note 73.. But he who said in childbirth, from here that Satan¹⁹⁰The prosecutor in the Heavenly Court. accuses¹⁹¹A Hebrew verb formed from Greek κατηγορέω “accuse”. The vocalization בְשָׁעַת is from G. only in times of danger.