Les Nombres 7:18 Midrash : Shir HaShirim Rabbah, Bamidbar Rabbah, Midrash Tanchuma & Midrash Tanchuma Buber

בַּיּוֹם֙ הַשֵּׁנִ֔י הִקְרִ֖יב נְתַנְאֵ֣ל בֶּן־צוּעָ֑ר נְשִׂ֖יא יִשָּׂשכָֽר׃

Le second jour, l’offrant fut Nethanel, fils de Çouar, phylarque d’Issachar,

Shir HaShirim Rabbah

“All of you is fair, my love, and there is no blemish in you” (Song of Songs 4:7).
“All of you is fair, my love” – this is Jacob our patriarch, whose bed was unflawed and no waste was found among it.92Unlike his father and grandfather, all his offspring were righteous.
What is, “all of you is fair, my love”? Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai taught: When Israel stood before Mount Sinai and said: “Everything that God spoke we will perform and we will heed” (Exodus 24:7), at that moment there were in their midst neither zav, nor leper, nor lame, nor blind, nor mute, nor deaf, nor imbecile, nor depressed, nor fool, nor doubter. Regarding that moment it is stated: “All of you is fair, my love.” When they sinned, there were not easy times, and there were in their midst zav, leper, lame, blind, mute, deaf, imbecile, and fool. At that moment it is stated: “They shall banish from the camp every leper and every zav” (Numbers 5:2).
Rabbi Ḥelbo said: It is written: “The one who presented his offering on the first day was [Naḥshon son of Aminadav of the tribe of Judah. And his offering was…]” (Numbers 7:12–13). “On the second day, presented Netanel [son of Tzuar].… his offering was…” (Numbers 7:18–19). Why did the Torah depict Judah as secondary?93In relating Naḥshon’s offering the Torah uses a vav, meaning “and,” in the term vekorbano, “and his offering was,” indicating that there had been someone before him, although there had not been. Regarding Netanel the Torah does not use a vav even though there had been someone before him. It is so Judah would not become arrogant and say: I presented first, I am the greatest of them all. Rather, the Holy One blessed be He treated them as though they all presented on the first day and on the last day.
Rabbi Elazar said: It is written: “This was the dedication of the altar on the day it was anointed” (Numbers 7:84). But did each of them not offer one bowl, one ladle? Why does the verse state: “twelve silver bowls, twelve silver basins, twelve golden ladles” (Numbers 7:84)? It was so that Judah would not say: I presented first, I am the greatest of them all. Therefore, the Holy One blessed be He treated them as though they all presented on the first day and on the last day.
Rabbi Berekhya said: It is written: “All these are the tribes of Israel, twelve, [and this is that which their father spoke to them and blessed them; every one according to his blessing he blessed them]” (Genesis 49:28). After he blessed them did he bless them again? Rather, it teaches that Jacob our patriarch sat and likened them to beasts. He likened Judah to a lion, as it is stated: “Judah is a lion cub” (Genesis 49:9). Dan to a snake, as it is stated: “Dan will be a serpent on the road” (Genesis 49:17). Naphtali to a hind, as it is stated: “Naphtali is a hind let loose” (Genesis 49:21). Benjamin to a wolf, as it is stated: “Benjamin is a ravenous wolf” (Genesis 49:27). Then he called them all wolves, all of them snakes, all of them fiery serpents, all of them scorpions. Know that it is so, as Dan, whom he called a snake, he94Moses then called a lion, as it is stated: “Dan is a lion cub” (Deuteronomy 33:22). Rabbi Idi said: We have found in the offerings of the princes that what this one offered that one offered. This one sacrificed a burnt offering, and that one sacrificed a burnt-offering; this one a meal offering and that one a meal offering; this one a sin offering and that one a sin offering; this one a peace offering and that one a peace offering. Why? It is because all of them are faultless and equal to one another.
What led the verse to delineate their genealogy in the book [of Exodus], Reuben, Simeon, and Levi?95The verses delineate the genealogies of only these three tribes (see Exodus 6:14–25). Rabbi Ḥanina and Rabbi Levi: one said: It is because their father reprimanded them,96When Jacob gave blessings to his sons before his death, he reprimanded Reuben, Simeon, and Levi (see Genesis 49:3–7). In order to emphasize that these tribes were not inferior, the verses list their genealogies as they introduce Moses and Aaron. and one said: It was because it delineated the genealogy of Moses and Aaron.97Because the Torah sought to address the genealogy of Aaron and Moses from the tribe of Levi, it began with Reuben, the first of the tribes, and continued through Levi. We do not know who said this and who said that. However, from the fact that Rabbi Yudan said in the name of Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon in the name of Rabbi Huna: “An ear that heeds life’s reprimand will rest among the wise” (Proverbs 15:31), it is Rabbi Huna98This is possibly an alternate pronunciation of the name of Rabbi Ḥanina. Alternatively, the text should either state Rabbi Ḥanina here or Rabbi Huna above. who said because their father reprimanded them. Because they accepted their father’s reprimand they were privileged to have their genealogy delineated alongside Moses and Aaron. That is why it is stated: “All of you is fair.”
Rabbi Yehuda, Rabbi Neḥemya, and the Rabbis: Rabbi Yehuda said: It is because all the tribes did not preserve their genealogies in Egypt, but Reuben, Simeon, and Levi preserved their genealogy.99They married only with families that could prove they were of pure lineage. Rabbi Neḥemya said: It is because all the tribes engaged in idol worship in Egypt, but the tribes of Reuben, Simeon, and Levi did not engage in idol worship. The Rabbis say: It is because the other tribes did not exercise authority in Egypt, but these tribes exercised authority. How so? When Reuben died,100Joseph had been the authority figure among the brothers and their descendants in Egypt, but he died before his brothers. At that point, Reuben, the eldest son of Jacob, became the authority figure. authority was transferred to Simeon. When Simeon died, authority was transferred to Levi. When Levi died, authority was going to be transferred to Judah. A Divine voice emerged and said: Leave it until its time arrives. When did its time arrive? After the death of Joshua. That is what is written: “It was after the death of Joshua.… the Lord said: Judah shall ascend” (Judges 1:1–2). He was called three names: Judah, Otniel, and Yabetz. Rabbi Berekhya and Rabbi Levi [said] in the name of Rabbi Ḥama ben Rabbi Ḥanina: This101Yabetz is Boaz. Rabbi Simon [said] in the name of Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi: This102Yabetz is Otniel.
It is written: “Son of man, the House of Israel has become dross to Me; they are all…” (Ezekiel 22:18). Zechariah said: I saw them, and they were pure gold: “I saw, and behold, a candelabrum of gold in its entirety, with a bowl [gulah] atop it.… and there are two olive trees over it” (Zechariah 4:2–3). There were two amora’im; one said exile [gola], and one said their Redeemer [go’alah]. The one who said gola: As they were exiled to Babylon, and the Divine Presence was exiled with them. The one who said go’alah: It is their redemption, as it is written: “Our Redeemer, the Lord of hosts is His name…” (Isaiah 47:4). The Holy One blessed be He said: Since that is the case:103Since in the future they will all be comparable to pure gold, as envisioned by Zechariah. “All of you is fair, my love, and there is no blemish in you.”

Bamidbar Rabbah

“On the second day, Netanel son of Tzuar, prince of Issachar, presented his offering” (Numbers 7:18).
“He presented his offering: One silver dish, its weight one hundred and thirty; one silver basin of seventy shekels, in the sacred shekel; both of them full of high quality flour mixed with oil as a meal offering” (Numbers 7:19).

Why does it say in his regard: “Presented his offering [hikriv]”? (Numbers 7:18). It is because Reuben came and appealed. He said: ‘It is enough that Judah preceded me, just as he did on the journeys. I will present the [next] offering, in accordance with birth order.’ Moses reprimanded him and said to him: 'From the mouth of the Holy One blessed be He, it was stated to me: ‘Present the offerings [hakrev] in accordance with the journeys.’51Since the camp of Judah went first in the journeys, the tribes in that camp sacrificed first. Within each camp, the Torah orders the tribes. Thus, in the camp of Judah, the order is Judah, Issachar, Zevulun (Numbers 2:1–9.) Alternatively, hikriv, Moses brought him near [hikrivo], against Reuben’s will.
Another matter, “presented [his offering] – it is as though he presented his offering first. Why was it so? Because he was privileged to counsel the princes, the verse ascribes to him as though he presented his offering first. Abba Ḥanan says in the name of Rabbi Eliezer: Because he was privileged to counsel, he merited that understanding was granted to his tribe, as it is stated: “From the children of Issachar, possessors of understanding of the times” (I Chronicles 12:33), and it is stated: “Princes of Issachar were with Deborah” (Judges 5:15). Likewise, the verse speaks his praise as he sat on the tribunals in Egypt, as it is stated: “[Descendants of Issachar…] of Yashuv, the Yashuvite family” (Numbers 26:23–24), and yashuv is nothing other than courts,52Since Yashuv was in Egypt, and it is a term which refers to tribunals, we learn that there were tribunals in Egypt. as it is stated: “They will come to you as a people comes, and…will sit [veyeshvu] before you” (Ezekiel 33:31). “Jacob was a simple man, dwelling in tents” (Genesis 25:27),53“Tents” is expounded as a reference to the study halls of Shem and Ever. and it says: “And Issachar in your tents” (Deuteronomy 33:18).54This teaches that the tribe of Issachar studied a lot of Torah.
“He presented [hikriv] his offering…” (Numbers 7:19), Rabbi Pinḥas ben Yair said: Why did it add hikriv,55In the sacrifices of the other tribes, the word hikriv is not used. and it is lacking a yod? Rather, it was corresponding to the red heifer that they prepared on that day; that is why he added hikriv lacking a yod, establishing the word with four letters, corresponding to the four matters that the heifer required: Red, complete, unblemished, without having borne a yoke, just as it says: “They shall take to you a completely red heifer [in which there is no blemish, and upon which a yoke was not placed]” (Numbers 19:2).
“One silver dish” (Numbers 7:19), the prince of Issachar came and presented an offering in the name of the Torah, because they loved the Torah more than all the tribes did, as it is stated: “From the children of Issachar, possessors of understanding of the times, [to know what Israel should do; their leaders were two hundred, and all their brethren at their command]” (I Chronicles 12:33). What is “of the times”? Rabbi Tanḥuma said: To perform matters in a timely fashion. Rabbi Yosei says: For intercalations. “To know what Israel should do” – on what day they should observe the festivals. “Their leaders were two hundred” – these are the two hundred heads of the Sanhedrin that the tribe of Issachar produced. “And all their brethren at their command” – as others would agree to the halakha in accordance with their opinion. And it says: “[Issachar….] He bent his shoulder to bear” (Genesis 49:14–15), as they would bear the yoke of Torah. “And he became an indentured servant” (Genesis 49:15), as anyone who would err in halakha, they would ask the tribe of Issachar regarding it, and they would explain it to them.
“Silver dish,” corresponding to the Torah, that is called bread, as it is stated: “Come, partake of my bread” (Proverbs 9:5). And it is stated regarding the showbread: “You shall craft its dishes and its ladles” (Exodus 25:29), and we learned: The dishes were molds, as they would shape the showbread with molds.
“Its weight one hundred and thirty” (Numbers 7:19), go out and calculate twenty-four books of the written Torah, and eighty of mishna, that begin with mem: “From when [me’ematai] does one recite shema…” (Berakhot 1:1), and ends with mem: “The Lord will bless his people with peace” (Okatzin 3:12). Mem is forty and mem is forty, that is eighty;56Since the sum of the first letter in the Mishna and the last letter in the Mishna is 80, the number 80 represents the oral law. that is one hundred and four, the result of the tally of the written Torah and the Oral Torah. Alternatively, the beginnings of the six orders of Mishna, the tally of the first letters total eighty. Go out and calculate: mem of “me’ematai” (Berakhot 1:1), from the order of Zera’im; yod of “yetziot haShabbat” (Shabbat 1:1), from the order of Moed; ḥet of “ḥamesh esre nashim” (Yevamot 1:1), from the order of Nashim; alef of “arba’a avot nezikin” (Bava Kama 1:1), from the order of Yeshuot;57Also known as Nezikin. kaf of “kol hazevaḥim” from the order of Kodashim; alef of “avot hatuma” from the order of Teharot, equals eighty.58Mem – 40, + yod – 10, + ḥet – 8, + alef – 1, + kaf – 20, + alef – 1 = 80. From here [we see] that the written Torah and the Oral Torah total a tally of one hundred and four. The Torah was given after the twenty-six generations that were from Adam until Moses, by means of whom the Torah was given. That is one hundred and thirty; therefore, the weight of the dish was one hundred and thirty.

Midrash Tanchuma

[(Numb. 7:1), “So it came to pass on the day that Moses had finished.” This text is related (to (Numb. 24:5), “How beautiful are your tents, O Jacob, your Tabernacles O Israel.” If your tents [is meant], why your Tabernacles? But if your Tabernacles [is meant], why your tents? It is simply this: “How beautiful are your tents,” these are the tents; and “your Tabernacles (mishkenotekha),” do not read this (i.e., mishkenotekha), but "your sureties" (mashkonotekha).82Numb. R. 12:14. The Holy One, blessed be He, said to Moses, “Tell Israel to make a Tabernacle, so that if they sin, it will be seized [instead of] them.” You yourself know that this is so. When they sinned, what is written (in Ps. 78:59-60)? “God heard and was enraged […]. So He abandoned the Tabernacle of Shiloh, the tent where He dwelt among mortals (which can be read as, surety for mortals).” This is the Tabernacle, which was only made so that if they sinned, it might be seized [instead] of them. (Numb. 7:1:) “So it came to pass on the day that Moses had finished setting up the Tabernacle, and he anointed it.” When he had anointed it, he returned and anointed each and every one of [its] vessels. Then the princes of Israel offered sacrifices. They said, “Now is the hour when we shall joyfully offer sacrifices, since the Divine Presence is dwelling among us.”83Numb. R. 12:16. Then when they saw that the Tabernacle had been made and that there was nothing at all [lacking] for them in it, they said, “What is there for us to bring? They went and brought wagons on which they would carry the Tabernacle. But who gave them this suggestion? The tribe of Issachar, since they were wise and mighty in the Torah, as stated (in I Chron 12:33), “And from the Children of Issachar, those who had an understanding of the times, [to know what Israel should do].”84Cant. R. 6:4:2. For that reason they had the right to offer sacrifice (hqyb) on the second day (only after Judah), as stated (in Numb. 7:18), “On the second day Nethanel ben Zuar, prince of Issachar, presented (hqryb, rt.: qrb) [his] offering.” In [the order of] all the princes, why is it stated, “his offering,” whereas here [with Issachar], it is stated (in vs. 19), “He presented (hqrb; rt.: qrb) his offering.” [It is so mentioned] because he offered (hqryb; rt.: qrb) it in accordance with the [divine] command. When the rest of the tribes, who were older than [Issachar], wanted to sacrifice (rt.: qrb) [first], they decided [the matter] from heaven. So the tribe of Issachar was commanded to approach (rt.: qrb) with a sacrifice (rt.: qrb) for the altar and offer (rt.: qrb) its sacrifice (rt.: qrb). You yourself know that it is so written (in vs. 19) where presented (hqrb) lacks [a y (i.e., a yod) and as such is really an imperative, meaning "come near."] When [that tribe] was far away, it was brought near, to come (i.e., to offer sacrifice).85The verb, NTHQRB (rt.: QRB), used here means “brought near,” but the root also denotes the offering of a sacrifice. Thus the tribe of Issachar was moved up in order for offering sacrifice. And why all this? Because they were knowledgeable in the Torah, as stated (in I Chron. 12:33), “And from the Children of Issachar, those who had an understanding of the times, [to know what Israel should do]; their heads were two hundred.” These were heads of courts (sanhedraot). (I Chron. 12:33, cont.:) “And all their kinfolk were at their command ('al-pihem).” [This verse] is teaching you that they all affirmed the oral law (halakhah) [that was] on their lips ('al-pihem).