בַּיּוֹם֙ הָרְבִיעִ֔י נָשִׂ֖יא לִבְנֵ֣י רְאוּבֵ֑ן אֱלִיצ֖וּר בֶּן־שְׁדֵיאֽוּר׃
Au quatrième jour, le phylarque des enfants de Ruben, Eliçour, fils de Chedéour.
Bamidbar Rabbah
“On the third day, prince of the children of Zebulun, Eliav son of Ḥelon” (Numbers 7:24).
“On the third day, prince of the children of Zebulun, Eliav son of Ḥelon” – why, regarding all the princes, does it mention their tribe and then mentions their name, but regarding Judah and Issachar, it mentions the name of their princes first and then mentions their name? It is because Naḥshon was king, and Netanel was the king of Torah, just as it says: “Through me kings reign” (Proverbs 8:15), and in every circumstance, the king precedes his people, as it is stated: “Their king passed before them…” (Micah 2:13); “To enact justice for His servant" (I Kings 8:59); and then: “and justice for His people Israel, the matter of each day on its day” (I Kings 8:59).
Why, regarding all the princes, the title prince is written, but Naḥshon is not called “prince”? It is because he presented his offering first. Were he to come and be haughty regarding the other princes, saying: ‘I am king over them, as I presented my offering first,’ they could say to him: ‘You are nothing but a commoner, as all of them are called prince, and you were not called prince.’ This is to realize what is stated: “Anyone haughty of heart is an abomination to the Lord” (Proverbs 16:5). And it says: “Though the Lord is exalted, He sees the lowly; the haughty He knows from afar” (Psalms 138:6).
Why was Zebulun privileged to present his offering third? It is because he was fond of the Torah and was generous in dispensing his money to Issachar, so that the tribe of Issachar would not require a livelihood and would not be idle from engaging in Torah study. Therefore, Zebulun was privileged to be a partner in the Torah, and was Issachar’s associate, and that is why he presented his offering after him and after Judah, to realize what is stated: “A man’s giving expands him, and will guide him before the great” (Proverbs 18:16).
“His offering was one silver dish, its weight one hundred and thirty; one silver basin of seventy shekels, in the sacred shekel; both of them full of high quality flour mixed with oil as a meal offering” (Numbers 7:25).
“His offering was one silver dish” – the prince of Zebulun came and presented his offering due to his partnership with his brother Issachar, as Zebulun and Issachar were partners. Issachar would engage in Torah study and Zebulun would engage in commerce. Zebulun would toil and put food in Issachar’s mouth. This is why his offering was a “silver dish” – it was corresponding to the sea, that is shaped like a dish, and that was the portion of Zebulun, as it is stated: “Zebulun will dwell at the shore of seas” (Genesis 49:13). “One silver basin,” corresponding to the land that is shaped like an orb and that was the portion of Issachar, as it is stated: “He saw rest, that it was good, and the land, that it was pleasant” (Genesis 49:15).
“Its weight one hundred and thirty; one silver basin of seventy shekels,” that is two hundred, corresponding to the two hundred heads of the Sanhedrin who were from the tribe of Issachar, as it is stated: “[From the children of Issachar]…their leaders were two hundred” (I Chronicles 12:33). That is why it attributed the larger tally to Zebulun, because the one who causes the action is greater than the one who performs it, as had it not been for Zebulun, Issachar would have been unable to engage in Torah study, as he [Zebulun] would feed him and put food in his mouth.
Another matter, “dish,” corresponding to the food that he would feed him. “Basin,” corresponding to the wine that he would give him to drink. Why was it of silver? It is because he would also give him silver with which to perform all his needs, just as it says: “For laughter one prepares bread, wine brings joy the living, and silver answers everything” (Ecclesiastes 10:19).
“Both of them full of high quality flour [mixed with oil as a meal offering],” both Zebulun and Issachar would receive the reward for Torah together, and both would earn a livelihood together.
“One gold ladle, ten shekels, full of incense” (Numbers 7:26).
“One young bull, one ram, one lamb in its first year, as a burnt offering” (Numbers 7:27).
“One goat as a sin offering” (Numbers 7:28).
“And for the peace offering, two cattle, five rams, five goats, five sheep in their first year. This was the offering of Eliav son of Ḥelon” (Numbers 7:29).
“One…ladle [kaf]” (Numbers 7:26), this was Zebulun’s blessing that his father blessed him: “Zebulun will dwell at the shore [ḥof] of seas” (Genesis 49:13). And kaf is nothing other than ḥaf, just as it says: “Rivers will clap hands [khaf]” (Psalms 98:8).66This sound will be created by the river striking the shore; kaf equals khaf = shore. “Gold…ten shekels full of incense” (Numbers 7:26), corresponding to the ten words67In Hebrew. in Zebulun’s blessing. That is what is written: “Zebulun…at the shore of seas…” (Genesis 49:13). “And for the peace offering, two cattle” (Numbers 7:29), corresponding to the blessing that Moses blessed them: “Because they will be nourished by the bounty of the seas, and the hidden treasures of the sand” (Deuteronomy 33:19).
“One young bull…” (Numbers 7:27), it mentioned all the species for a burnt offering, besides the goat that was a sin offering, as we have not found a goat as a burnt offering. This is corresponding to the blessing of Moses who blessed them both regarding the offering, as it is stated: “Nations they will call to the mountain, there, they will sacrifice offerings of righteousness” (Deuteronomy 33:19). The burnt offering is “offerings of righteousness,” as it does not come due to a sin. Alternatively, it is because both Zebulun and Issachar were presenting their offering together, and the “offerings of righteousness" were the offerings, as, just as Zebulun had a share of the reward for his Torah, so, Issachar had a portion in Zebulun’s money.
“And for the peace offering, two cattle” (Numbers 7:29), corresponding to what Moses blessed them: “Because they will be nourished by the bounty of the seas” (Deuteronomy 33:19), two seas. “Five rams, five goats, five sheep in their first year” (Numbers 7:29), he sacrificed three species corresponding to the three matters regarding which Moses blessed them: “and the hidden treasures of the sand [usefunei temunei ḥol]” (Deutereonomy 33:19). Sefunei, this is snail;68From which the dye of tkhelet is derived. temunei, this is tuna; ḥol, this is white sand. Why were there five of each and every species? It is corresponding to the five words69In Hebrew. in the verse in which Moses blessed their partnership, as it is stated: “Rejoice, Zebulun, in your departure, and, Issachar, in your tents” (Deuteronomy 33:18).
“This was the offering of Eliav…” (Numbers 7:29), when the Holy One blessed be He saw that he presented his offering regarding the partnership in the Torah, He began lauding his offering: “This was the offering of Eliav,” to realize what is stated: "It is a tree of life for those who grasp it” (Proverbs 3:18); this is the tribe of Issachar, “and its supporters are happy” (Proverbs 3:18); this is the tribe of Zebulun.
“On the third day, prince of the children of Zebulun, Eliav son of Ḥelon” – why, regarding all the princes, does it mention their tribe and then mentions their name, but regarding Judah and Issachar, it mentions the name of their princes first and then mentions their name? It is because Naḥshon was king, and Netanel was the king of Torah, just as it says: “Through me kings reign” (Proverbs 8:15), and in every circumstance, the king precedes his people, as it is stated: “Their king passed before them…” (Micah 2:13); “To enact justice for His servant" (I Kings 8:59); and then: “and justice for His people Israel, the matter of each day on its day” (I Kings 8:59).
Why, regarding all the princes, the title prince is written, but Naḥshon is not called “prince”? It is because he presented his offering first. Were he to come and be haughty regarding the other princes, saying: ‘I am king over them, as I presented my offering first,’ they could say to him: ‘You are nothing but a commoner, as all of them are called prince, and you were not called prince.’ This is to realize what is stated: “Anyone haughty of heart is an abomination to the Lord” (Proverbs 16:5). And it says: “Though the Lord is exalted, He sees the lowly; the haughty He knows from afar” (Psalms 138:6).
Why was Zebulun privileged to present his offering third? It is because he was fond of the Torah and was generous in dispensing his money to Issachar, so that the tribe of Issachar would not require a livelihood and would not be idle from engaging in Torah study. Therefore, Zebulun was privileged to be a partner in the Torah, and was Issachar’s associate, and that is why he presented his offering after him and after Judah, to realize what is stated: “A man’s giving expands him, and will guide him before the great” (Proverbs 18:16).
“His offering was one silver dish, its weight one hundred and thirty; one silver basin of seventy shekels, in the sacred shekel; both of them full of high quality flour mixed with oil as a meal offering” (Numbers 7:25).
“His offering was one silver dish” – the prince of Zebulun came and presented his offering due to his partnership with his brother Issachar, as Zebulun and Issachar were partners. Issachar would engage in Torah study and Zebulun would engage in commerce. Zebulun would toil and put food in Issachar’s mouth. This is why his offering was a “silver dish” – it was corresponding to the sea, that is shaped like a dish, and that was the portion of Zebulun, as it is stated: “Zebulun will dwell at the shore of seas” (Genesis 49:13). “One silver basin,” corresponding to the land that is shaped like an orb and that was the portion of Issachar, as it is stated: “He saw rest, that it was good, and the land, that it was pleasant” (Genesis 49:15).
“Its weight one hundred and thirty; one silver basin of seventy shekels,” that is two hundred, corresponding to the two hundred heads of the Sanhedrin who were from the tribe of Issachar, as it is stated: “[From the children of Issachar]…their leaders were two hundred” (I Chronicles 12:33). That is why it attributed the larger tally to Zebulun, because the one who causes the action is greater than the one who performs it, as had it not been for Zebulun, Issachar would have been unable to engage in Torah study, as he [Zebulun] would feed him and put food in his mouth.
Another matter, “dish,” corresponding to the food that he would feed him. “Basin,” corresponding to the wine that he would give him to drink. Why was it of silver? It is because he would also give him silver with which to perform all his needs, just as it says: “For laughter one prepares bread, wine brings joy the living, and silver answers everything” (Ecclesiastes 10:19).
“Both of them full of high quality flour [mixed with oil as a meal offering],” both Zebulun and Issachar would receive the reward for Torah together, and both would earn a livelihood together.
“One gold ladle, ten shekels, full of incense” (Numbers 7:26).
“One young bull, one ram, one lamb in its first year, as a burnt offering” (Numbers 7:27).
“One goat as a sin offering” (Numbers 7:28).
“And for the peace offering, two cattle, five rams, five goats, five sheep in their first year. This was the offering of Eliav son of Ḥelon” (Numbers 7:29).
“One…ladle [kaf]” (Numbers 7:26), this was Zebulun’s blessing that his father blessed him: “Zebulun will dwell at the shore [ḥof] of seas” (Genesis 49:13). And kaf is nothing other than ḥaf, just as it says: “Rivers will clap hands [khaf]” (Psalms 98:8).66This sound will be created by the river striking the shore; kaf equals khaf = shore. “Gold…ten shekels full of incense” (Numbers 7:26), corresponding to the ten words67In Hebrew. in Zebulun’s blessing. That is what is written: “Zebulun…at the shore of seas…” (Genesis 49:13). “And for the peace offering, two cattle” (Numbers 7:29), corresponding to the blessing that Moses blessed them: “Because they will be nourished by the bounty of the seas, and the hidden treasures of the sand” (Deuteronomy 33:19).
“One young bull…” (Numbers 7:27), it mentioned all the species for a burnt offering, besides the goat that was a sin offering, as we have not found a goat as a burnt offering. This is corresponding to the blessing of Moses who blessed them both regarding the offering, as it is stated: “Nations they will call to the mountain, there, they will sacrifice offerings of righteousness” (Deuteronomy 33:19). The burnt offering is “offerings of righteousness,” as it does not come due to a sin. Alternatively, it is because both Zebulun and Issachar were presenting their offering together, and the “offerings of righteousness" were the offerings, as, just as Zebulun had a share of the reward for his Torah, so, Issachar had a portion in Zebulun’s money.
“And for the peace offering, two cattle” (Numbers 7:29), corresponding to what Moses blessed them: “Because they will be nourished by the bounty of the seas” (Deuteronomy 33:19), two seas. “Five rams, five goats, five sheep in their first year” (Numbers 7:29), he sacrificed three species corresponding to the three matters regarding which Moses blessed them: “and the hidden treasures of the sand [usefunei temunei ḥol]” (Deutereonomy 33:19). Sefunei, this is snail;68From which the dye of tkhelet is derived. temunei, this is tuna; ḥol, this is white sand. Why were there five of each and every species? It is corresponding to the five words69In Hebrew. in the verse in which Moses blessed their partnership, as it is stated: “Rejoice, Zebulun, in your departure, and, Issachar, in your tents” (Deuteronomy 33:18).
“This was the offering of Eliav…” (Numbers 7:29), when the Holy One blessed be He saw that he presented his offering regarding the partnership in the Torah, He began lauding his offering: “This was the offering of Eliav,” to realize what is stated: "It is a tree of life for those who grasp it” (Proverbs 3:18); this is the tribe of Issachar, “and its supporters are happy” (Proverbs 3:18); this is the tribe of Zebulun.
Bamidbar Rabbah
“On the fourth day, prince of the children of Reuben, Elitzur son of Shedeur” (Numbers 7:30).
“On the fourth day, prince of the children of Reuben…” – once the banner of Judah70See Numbers 2:1–9. finished, the prince of Reuben began presenting his offering, because he was the firstborn, and he presented the offering regarding his tribe of Reuben.
“His offering was one silver dish, its weight one hundred and thirty; one silver basin of seventy shekels, in the sacred shekel; both of them full of high quality flour mixed with oil as a meal offering” (Numbers 7:31).
“One gold ladle, ten shekels, full of incense” (Numbers 7:32).
“His offering was one silver dish [ke’arat]” (Numbers 7:31), do not read it as ke’arat, but rather, as akeret; this is Reuben, who played the main [ikar] role in the rescue [of Joseph]. It was he who first initiated the rescue. That is what is written: “Reuben heard and rescued him from their hand” (Genesis 37:21). Alternatively, that he uprooted [akar] the thought of his brothers, who wanted to kill him, just as it says: “Now let us go and kill him…” (Genesis 37:20). “Silver,” in the sense of: “The tongue of the righteous is choice silver” (Proverbs 10:20). ”Its weight one hundred and thirty,” this is because the first three letters of the first three words that he said to them, their numerical value totals one hundred and thirty. “Let us not smite him mortally [lo nakenu nafesh]” (Genesis 37:21); take lamed from lo, nun from nakenu, and nun from nafesh; that is one hundred and thirty.71Lamed is thirty and nun is fifty, so 30 + 50 + 50 = 130.
“One silver basin [mizrak],” (Numbers 7:31), corresponding to the counsel he gave them that they should cast [sheyizreku] him into the pit, just as it says: “Reuben said to them: Do not shed blood; cast him into [this] pit…” (Genesis 37:22). “Silver,” in the sense of: “The tongue of the righteous is choice silver” (Proverbs 10:20). “Of seventy shekels, in the sacred shekel” (Numbers 7:31), corresponding to the secret [sod] that was in his heart to save him [Joseph]. The numerical value of sod is seventy.72Samekh is sixty, vav is 6 and dalet is 4 = 70. “Both of them full of high quality flour…” (Numbers 7:31), as what he said to them: “Let us not smite him mortally” and “cast him,” he intended only to rescue him, as in both matters,73His statement not to kill Joseph, and his proposal to throw Joseph into the pit. rescue is written: Initially, it is written: “Reuben heard and rescued him from their hand” (Genesis 37:21), and ultimately, it is written: “In order to rescue him from their hand” (Genesis 37:22). “One gold ladle [kaf], ten shekels…” (Numbers 7:32), kaf,74Kaf also means palm or hand. corresponding to what he said to his brothers: “Do not lay a hand on him” (Genesis 37:22). “Gold…ten shekels,” because he saved himself by admonishing them, and he saved nine brothers from bloodshed. That is why “gold” is written, as there is one type of gold that resembles blood, and that is parvayim gold. “Full of incense” (Numbers 7:32), although it happened to the tribes that Joseph’s sale befell them, you presume that this act would not have befallen them unless they had been wicked in performing other acts. No, but rather they were full-fledged righteous men, and no sin had ever befallen them other than this one: That is what is written: “They said one to another: But we are guilty [regarding our brother]” (Genesis 42:21). They were engaged in self-reflection as to why their detention in Egypt befell them, but found only this. From their disgrace, the verse relates their praise, that they had only this iniquity alone attributable to them. And because Joseph’s sale was fortuitous for him, as it led him to rule, and it was fortuitous for his brothers and his father’s entire household, as he provided them with food during the famine years, that is why he was sold by them, because merit is engendered by means of the meritorious. That is “full of incense.”
Another matter, “full of incense,” as, at that time, Reuben was a penitent, donning sackcloth, fasting, and praying before the Holy One blessed be He, that He grant him atonement for the iniquity of the act with Bilha.75See Genesis 35:22. Prayer is likened to incense, just as it says: “Let my prayer stand as incense before You…” (Psalms 141:2). That is, “full of incense.”
“One young bull, one ram, one lamb in its first year, as a burnt offering” (Numbers 7:33).
“One goat as a sin offering” (Numbers 7:34).
“And for the peace offering, two cattle, five rams, five goats, five sheep in their first year. This was the offering of Elitzur son of Shedeur” (Numbers 7:35).
“One young bull…” (Numbers 7:33), these are the offerings that he sacrificed, corresponding to the penitence in which he was engaged when Joseph was sold. Penitence is likened to all the offerings of a sinner, as it is written: “Offerings to God are a broken spirit” (Psalms 51:19). Just as the sinner brings a burnt offering and a sin offering for his sin, that is why he brought here a burnt offering and a sin offering, corresponding to them. And because the burnt offering is more cherished76By the Holy One blessed be He. than the sin offering, that is why he sacrificed a burnt offering from all the species with the exception of the goat, as we do not find the goat as a burnt offering throughout the Torah.
“One goat as a sin offering” (Numbers 7:34), this is to atone for the act with Bilha. “And for the peace offering, two cattle” (Numbers 7:35), because he was [going to be] excluded from being enumerated with his brothers because of the act with Bilha, as it is written: “Reuben went and lay with Bilha, his father's concubine, and Israel heard” (Genesis 35:22), the matter was interrupted,77Genesis 35:22 is written in the Torah with an empty space in the middle of the verse following the phrase "and Israel heard," before the continuation “the sons of Jacob were twelve.” as it placed the end of the portion there, alluding that he was banished. This is why that portion is an open portion, as even though he was banished, the arms of the Holy One blessed be He are open to receive penitents. Because he sought to perform two good deeds, Joseph’s rescue and repentance, he was restored to be part of them, and was included in their tally. That is what is written: “The sons of Jacob were twelve” (Genesis 35:22). Due to these two acts that Reuben performed, Moses found an opportunity to pray on behalf of Reuben so that he would not be excluded from his brothers. That is what is written: “May Reuben live [and not die, and may his people be counted]” (Deuteronomy 33:6). “May Reuben live,” because he gave life to Joseph; “and not die,” due to the act of Bilha, because he repented; “and may his people be counted,” may his descendants be included in the tally of the other tribes in every sense. That is why it is stated: “And for the peace offering, two cattle [bakar]” (Numbers 7:35), corresponding to the two good deeds that he sought out [shebiker], Joseph’s rescue and the repentance, he was restored and was enumerated with his brothers.
“Five rams, five goats, five sheep in their first year” (Numbers 7:35), why three species? It is corresponding to the three times Reuben is mentioned in the portion of Joseph’s rescue and corresponding to the three “vayomer” that are written there.78Genesis 37:21, 22, 30. Why were there five of each? They correspond to the five words through which Reuben was drawn near. That is what is written: “The sons of Jacob were twelve.”79There are five words in the Hebrew phrase.
“This was the offering of Elitzur…” (Numbers 7:35), when the Holy One blessed be He saw that he presented his offering in this order, He began lauding his offering; “this was the offering…”
“On the fourth day, prince of the children of Reuben…” – once the banner of Judah70See Numbers 2:1–9. finished, the prince of Reuben began presenting his offering, because he was the firstborn, and he presented the offering regarding his tribe of Reuben.
“His offering was one silver dish, its weight one hundred and thirty; one silver basin of seventy shekels, in the sacred shekel; both of them full of high quality flour mixed with oil as a meal offering” (Numbers 7:31).
“One gold ladle, ten shekels, full of incense” (Numbers 7:32).
“His offering was one silver dish [ke’arat]” (Numbers 7:31), do not read it as ke’arat, but rather, as akeret; this is Reuben, who played the main [ikar] role in the rescue [of Joseph]. It was he who first initiated the rescue. That is what is written: “Reuben heard and rescued him from their hand” (Genesis 37:21). Alternatively, that he uprooted [akar] the thought of his brothers, who wanted to kill him, just as it says: “Now let us go and kill him…” (Genesis 37:20). “Silver,” in the sense of: “The tongue of the righteous is choice silver” (Proverbs 10:20). ”Its weight one hundred and thirty,” this is because the first three letters of the first three words that he said to them, their numerical value totals one hundred and thirty. “Let us not smite him mortally [lo nakenu nafesh]” (Genesis 37:21); take lamed from lo, nun from nakenu, and nun from nafesh; that is one hundred and thirty.71Lamed is thirty and nun is fifty, so 30 + 50 + 50 = 130.
“One silver basin [mizrak],” (Numbers 7:31), corresponding to the counsel he gave them that they should cast [sheyizreku] him into the pit, just as it says: “Reuben said to them: Do not shed blood; cast him into [this] pit…” (Genesis 37:22). “Silver,” in the sense of: “The tongue of the righteous is choice silver” (Proverbs 10:20). “Of seventy shekels, in the sacred shekel” (Numbers 7:31), corresponding to the secret [sod] that was in his heart to save him [Joseph]. The numerical value of sod is seventy.72Samekh is sixty, vav is 6 and dalet is 4 = 70. “Both of them full of high quality flour…” (Numbers 7:31), as what he said to them: “Let us not smite him mortally” and “cast him,” he intended only to rescue him, as in both matters,73His statement not to kill Joseph, and his proposal to throw Joseph into the pit. rescue is written: Initially, it is written: “Reuben heard and rescued him from their hand” (Genesis 37:21), and ultimately, it is written: “In order to rescue him from their hand” (Genesis 37:22). “One gold ladle [kaf], ten shekels…” (Numbers 7:32), kaf,74Kaf also means palm or hand. corresponding to what he said to his brothers: “Do not lay a hand on him” (Genesis 37:22). “Gold…ten shekels,” because he saved himself by admonishing them, and he saved nine brothers from bloodshed. That is why “gold” is written, as there is one type of gold that resembles blood, and that is parvayim gold. “Full of incense” (Numbers 7:32), although it happened to the tribes that Joseph’s sale befell them, you presume that this act would not have befallen them unless they had been wicked in performing other acts. No, but rather they were full-fledged righteous men, and no sin had ever befallen them other than this one: That is what is written: “They said one to another: But we are guilty [regarding our brother]” (Genesis 42:21). They were engaged in self-reflection as to why their detention in Egypt befell them, but found only this. From their disgrace, the verse relates their praise, that they had only this iniquity alone attributable to them. And because Joseph’s sale was fortuitous for him, as it led him to rule, and it was fortuitous for his brothers and his father’s entire household, as he provided them with food during the famine years, that is why he was sold by them, because merit is engendered by means of the meritorious. That is “full of incense.”
Another matter, “full of incense,” as, at that time, Reuben was a penitent, donning sackcloth, fasting, and praying before the Holy One blessed be He, that He grant him atonement for the iniquity of the act with Bilha.75See Genesis 35:22. Prayer is likened to incense, just as it says: “Let my prayer stand as incense before You…” (Psalms 141:2). That is, “full of incense.”
“One young bull, one ram, one lamb in its first year, as a burnt offering” (Numbers 7:33).
“One goat as a sin offering” (Numbers 7:34).
“And for the peace offering, two cattle, five rams, five goats, five sheep in their first year. This was the offering of Elitzur son of Shedeur” (Numbers 7:35).
“One young bull…” (Numbers 7:33), these are the offerings that he sacrificed, corresponding to the penitence in which he was engaged when Joseph was sold. Penitence is likened to all the offerings of a sinner, as it is written: “Offerings to God are a broken spirit” (Psalms 51:19). Just as the sinner brings a burnt offering and a sin offering for his sin, that is why he brought here a burnt offering and a sin offering, corresponding to them. And because the burnt offering is more cherished76By the Holy One blessed be He. than the sin offering, that is why he sacrificed a burnt offering from all the species with the exception of the goat, as we do not find the goat as a burnt offering throughout the Torah.
“One goat as a sin offering” (Numbers 7:34), this is to atone for the act with Bilha. “And for the peace offering, two cattle” (Numbers 7:35), because he was [going to be] excluded from being enumerated with his brothers because of the act with Bilha, as it is written: “Reuben went and lay with Bilha, his father's concubine, and Israel heard” (Genesis 35:22), the matter was interrupted,77Genesis 35:22 is written in the Torah with an empty space in the middle of the verse following the phrase "and Israel heard," before the continuation “the sons of Jacob were twelve.” as it placed the end of the portion there, alluding that he was banished. This is why that portion is an open portion, as even though he was banished, the arms of the Holy One blessed be He are open to receive penitents. Because he sought to perform two good deeds, Joseph’s rescue and repentance, he was restored to be part of them, and was included in their tally. That is what is written: “The sons of Jacob were twelve” (Genesis 35:22). Due to these two acts that Reuben performed, Moses found an opportunity to pray on behalf of Reuben so that he would not be excluded from his brothers. That is what is written: “May Reuben live [and not die, and may his people be counted]” (Deuteronomy 33:6). “May Reuben live,” because he gave life to Joseph; “and not die,” due to the act of Bilha, because he repented; “and may his people be counted,” may his descendants be included in the tally of the other tribes in every sense. That is why it is stated: “And for the peace offering, two cattle [bakar]” (Numbers 7:35), corresponding to the two good deeds that he sought out [shebiker], Joseph’s rescue and the repentance, he was restored and was enumerated with his brothers.
“Five rams, five goats, five sheep in their first year” (Numbers 7:35), why three species? It is corresponding to the three times Reuben is mentioned in the portion of Joseph’s rescue and corresponding to the three “vayomer” that are written there.78Genesis 37:21, 22, 30. Why were there five of each? They correspond to the five words through which Reuben was drawn near. That is what is written: “The sons of Jacob were twelve.”79There are five words in the Hebrew phrase.
“This was the offering of Elitzur…” (Numbers 7:35), when the Holy One blessed be He saw that he presented his offering in this order, He began lauding his offering; “this was the offering…”