Commentaire de citation sur La Genèse 22:7

הנה נא ידעתי כי אשה יפת מראה את, “here now, I am well aware that you are a woman of beautiful appearance, etc.” The word הנה usually appears as an introduction to something new as in Genesis 19,20 where Lot introduces his request to spare the town of Tzoar by saying הנה נא העיר הזאת קרובה “here, after all, is this city which is nearby.” Another example of a new subject being introduced with the word הנה appears in Genesis 22,6 when Yitzchak prefaces his inquiry about where the lamb for the sacrifice is with the word הנה.

וקרבנו, “and his offering, etc.” At this point the Torah wrote an apparently superfluous letter ו at the beginning of the word וקרבנו, seeing Nachshon was the first one of the princes to offer his קרבן, so that a prefix connecting it to something previous appears totally uncalled for. Similarly, we find an uncharacteristic letter ו in the word עתודים, rams, in verse 17. [On the other 13 occasions when that word occurs in the Torah it is always spelled defective, i.e. without the letter ו. Ed.] The reason for these exceptions is to draw our attention to 6=ו new developments which occurred on that day. 1) It was the first day on which priests performed their functions. 2) It was the first day that the priests began the daily routine of blessing the people. 3) It was the first day on which the publicly financed sacrificial offerings in the Tabernacle were presented on the Altar. 4) It was the first day of the first month of the year. 5) It was the first anniversary of the calendar reform introduced in honour of the Exodus from Egypt. 6) On that day the first red heifer was burned and its ashes preserved to enable the Israelites to purify themselves. Ibn Ezra writes that the meaning of the additional letter ו at the beginning of the word וקרבנו is grammatically completely justified in view of the Torah having written previously in verse 12 that Nachshon was the first of the princes to offer this particular offering. The Torah continues therefore by listing the details of his offering. Of the princes who offered the parallel offering on the second day, (verse 18) the Torah writes: הקריב קרבנו, although at first glance these words appear superfluous, because so much verbiage had been written since verse 12. We have similar examples of such apparently superfluous verbiage when the Torah writes (Genesis 22,7) ויאמר יצחק אל אברהם אביו ויאמר אבי!, “Yitzchok said to his father Avraham, saying: “My father!” You will note that the Torah does not bother to write the word הקריב, ”he presented the offering,” in connection with any of the other 10 princes. This was in order to be as brief as possible without becoming misleading.

“Isaac said to his father Abraham, Father” [22:7]. Here one asks a question. Why does the verse have to say, “to his father Abraham”? We know very well that Abraham is his father. Then, he says again, “my father.” Why does it have to say that he is his father? Bahya writes. He called him father, father. That is to say, he should have compassion on him, like a father for his son.¹⁴⁶Bahya, Genesis, 22:7.