Commentaire de citation sur Les Proverbes 20:17

עָרֵ֣ב לָ֭אִישׁ לֶ֣חֶם שָׁ֑קֶר וְ֝אַחַ֗ר יִמָּֽלֵא־פִ֥יהוּ חָצָֽץ׃

Le pain dû au mensonge peut être agréable à l’homme; finalement, sa bouche est pleine de gravier.

Rabbeinu Bahya

In this verse Solomon commands a Jewish person to be of “soft” heart and to be constantly concerned about the purpose and outcome of all his activities. He warns us not to he hard-hearted in order to avoid being punished for obstinacy.
The word אשרי, “happy is,” is applied here to an individual who excels in a single virtue rather than in a variety of virtues. This is the only instance instance where David or Solomon uses this word as applicable to the possession by a person of a single virtue. The reason that generally we do not find this word applied to individuals excelling in only one particular virtue alone is that the word presupposes the possession of a string of good characteristics in order for such people to be accorded this compliment.
Let us look at Psalms 65,5: “Happy is the man You choose and bring near to dwell in Your courts;” the person chosen by G’d is not chosen by Him on account of his excelling in a solitary virtue; surely it is presumed that he is virtuous in a number of ways. The same is undoubtedly true of Psalms 84,6: “happy is the man who finds refuge in You, whose mind is on the (pilgrim) highways.” The expression מסלות, “highways,” proves by its being in the plural that the author speaks of the heart commanding a number of different virtues, such as reverence for G’d, faith in the Lord, etc., etc. The same is true of verse 13 in the same Psalm: “O Lord of hosts, happy is the man who trusts in You.” The virtue of trusting in the Lord itself comprises a number of positive traits and a number of praiseworthy virtues. In Psalm 1,1 where David describes as “happy” the person “who has not followed the counsel of the wicked,” the psalmist himself subdivides this virtue into neither having “sat with them, walked with them, or even having stood near them.” Just as in that instance more than one virtue or the ramifications of such virtue in all its aspects is required, so here too Solomon in describing a person as “happy” because he is constantly concerned or even “afraid,” refers to something more than meets the eye at first glance. He refers to people who weigh each one of their actions carefully, considering possible harmful effects and if the beneficial effects of their actions outweigh any possible harm they could cause. All this they do prior to deciding on a course of action. There can be no question that people who display this kind of sense of responsibility are possessed of a whole string of virtues.
Seeing that the person who is described by Solomon as “happy” is motivated by his שכל, by his intellect, and cannot perform the virtues involved unless he employs his intellect he is called אדם rather than איש (as for instance in Psalms 1,1). The term אדם derives from אדמה, earth, soil. It is as if Solomon had said: “happy he who is cut off from the earth;” prior to cutting himself off from earth he was linked to material matters. Now, by employing the virtues mentioned by Solomon and employing his שכל, a disembodied phenomenon, he will remain conscious of the responsibilities he enters into with every one of his actions. Seeing that he worries about the result and wider impact of his actions, this alone will protect him against committing a sin.
When a person eats and drinks in order to indulge his appetite he thereby makes himself a partner to the animals. If however, he uses such an activity only in order to better perform service to the Lord, by maintaining his physical health at maximum level, then he has elevated the act of eating and drinking to an entirely new and spiritual level. The considerations which are valid for the manner and purpose of our food and drink intake apply in equal measure to the marital relations between husband and wife. Anyone who while indulging in sexual intercourse even with his wife is concerned simply with satisfying his biological urges and the gratification of his libido, is thereby making himself a partner to the animals. His main purpose when engaging in sexual activity must be to fulfill the commandment to be fruitful and to multiply and to raise children who will be G’d-fearing and, if possible, Torah scholars. Any other considerations are a desecration of the sex act. Similar considerations must guide people engaged in trade and commerce. Naturally, they must avoid being devious, and refrain from lies and cheating. If they were to use their business to cheat people they would lose their standing both in this world and in the world to come. But, even when they merely do not cheat or deceive, they have not yet performed these activities in a worthwhile manner. Unless their purpose is not the amassing of material wealth but to have the opportunity to acquire virtues such as to give liberally to charity, to endow brides who have no dowry, etc., etc., they have not performed what Solomon speaks of in our verse. The very money which is acquired by means of extortion, etc., becomes the instrument of the extortionist’s death sentence in the world to come. The desire to own money of this kind for the brief duration of life on earth is in itself a capital crime. It is comparable to the story of the bird which was so anxious to feed on the grain within the net that it found itself trapped within the net without hope of escape. Concerning this Solomon said (Proverbs 1,17-19) “in the eyes of every winged creature the outspread net means nothing. But they lie in wait for their own blood, they lie in wait for their own lives. So are the ways of all those who are greedy for gain; it takes the life of its owners.”
Solomon applied this parable to the people who are overly fond of money and are intent on amassing it. He said concerning such people (Proverbs 20,17) ”bread gained by deceit may taste sweet; but later his mouth will be filled with gravel.” The principles which must guide us in the examples listed apply to all of man’s activities. One must be worried constantly not to do something which runs counter to the teachings of the Torah and its outlook on life. Solomon views a person who is hard-hearted as the opposite of the one whom he describes as “constantly afraid.” The latter person obviously never considers the fact that he faces G’d every step of his life. The hard-hearted person does not think of what he does in terms of eventual reward of punishment. He who is constantly afraid does not have to worry about disaster facing him in the future as his lifestyle was his guarantee that no such disaster lurks in his future. He who is hard-hearted is always surprised when disaster strikes him and he is unprepared to cope with it. The reverse is true of the מפחד תמיד, the person who is constantly worried. His very worries are the reason that he will be spiritually uplifted. This is why Solomon applies to him the attribute אשרי, “happy.” Seeing that the proud and hard-hearted person elevated himself above others, Solomon chose the correct adjective when he described the result of such a person’s future as “he will fall into misfortune” We have a parallel verse in Proverbs 24,16: “for the righteous will rise even if he falls seven times; the wicked will be snared by evil.” Even a single stroke of misfortune will hit the hard-hearted so that he cannot recover from it. This is also the meaning of Psalms 34,22: “one misfortune is the deathblow of the wicked.” When Solomon wrote in Proverbs 16,4: “G’d has made everything for His purpose, even the wicked for the day of evil,” he meant that the evil which will strike the wicked has been prepared for him by G’d a long time in advance of it actually happening. It is part of what G’d does to enhance His Name, to be sanctified amongst those who observe His justice at work.
What happened to Pharaoh in our portion and previously had long been planned by G’d. Seeing that he had hardened his heart he was bound to experience the down side to his behavior. He had hardened his heart without G’d’s intervention already in 9,34. What applied to him also applied to most of his servants. In the end G’d hardened his heart even further in order to demonstrate His power to the world.

Bartenura

לאור הנר – In the Gemara ( Talmud Pesahim 2a), it derives that the search for Hametz must be by the light of a candle, since it is written here (Exodus 12:12: "שאר לא ימצא" / “no leaven shall be found” and it is written there (Genesis 44:12): “וימצא הגביע [באמתחת בנימן] / “and the goblet turned up in Benjamin’s bag,” Just as “something found” which is said there, is through searching, as it says, ‘And [the goblet] turned up,” so too, “something found” which is mentioned here, is through searching, and searching is done by a candle, as it is written (Proverbs 20:17)– "נר ה' נשמת אדם"/”The life-breath of man is the lamp (literally, “candle”) of God [revealing the innermost parts].” And they established, that the search is at night, since at night all the people are found in their homes, and the light of a candle is nicer for a search than during the day, for a lamp at noon – what good is it? But however, if he did not search [for Hametz] on the night of the fourteenth [of Nisan] and he searched on the fourteenth in the morning, he has to search also by the light of a candle.

Rabbeinu Bahya

In the course of the entire Book of Proverbs Solomon is at pains to demonstrate to us the superiority of intellect, wisdom, spirituality, etc. over the influence of man’s body.” He points out the ineffectiveness of the body demonstrating that it is lazy and inert by definition. Allowing it to dominate man would result in his having neither food, shelter nor clothing. Seeing that the acquisition of these things is necessary for man’s survival, unless he followed the dictates of his intellect he would perish as nature had not provided him with these necessities at birth. It is clear that the intellect should play a dominating role in man. The body does not know that clothing protects against cold, for instance. In order to know this one needs a brain, intelligence. It is because of such considerations that Solomon said: (Proverbs 12,27) “the lazy man does not roast his game; diligence is man’s precious possession.” The meaning of the verse is that a lazy man will not hold on to his wealth. Seeing that it is the custom of the hunter to burn the wings (feathers) of the birds to prevent them from escaping, Solomon says that that he who steals and expects to hang on to his stolen game will not get to roast it. The only wealth a person can expect to hang on to is that which was earned by diligent effort. If man were to rely on nature, he would become an opportunist or worse, a criminal. His intellect teaches him which activities are worthwhile and which even if successful in the short run will ultimately result in his being shamed. In Proverbs 20,17 Solomon elaborates further by writing “bread gained by deceit may taste sweet; but later his mouth will be filled with gravel.” Whereas “nature,” i.e. the body desires instant gratification, partying, sexual activity, etc., man’s intelligence warns him of the tenuous nature of all such joys. The reason that sexual activity is a physically gratifying experience is because G’d wants to encourage people to procreate and to ensure the continuity of the human species. [In order to show man that such joy may turn into the reverse, Solomon describes the temptress as dripping honey from her lips which eventually turns bitter as wormwood (Proverbs 5,3-4). [The author continues, illustrating his view of the parables employed by Solomon in his book of Proverbs. I have only quoted a brief selection of a long list of examples. Ed.]