Le Lévitique 5:15 Passages liés

Rebbi Yose in the name of Rebbi Pedaiah: Intentionally desecrated Temple property becomes profane without redemption¹⁹⁷This explains why for R. Meïr a marriage effected by intentional misuse of Temple property is valid.. But did we not state¹⁹⁸Sifra Wayyiqra Parašah 11(8), (Babli Pesaḥim 32b) referring to Lev. 5:15 dealing with larceny committed with sacrifices or Temple property, explicitly restricted to unintentional sin.: “In error,” that excludes intention? That you say for the additional fifth¹⁷⁷He extends the rules of Lev. 5:14–16 to all Temple property. The inadvertent use of Temple property constitutes larceny which requires a reparation offering and restitution in the amount of 125%, but the object taken becomes profane and, therefore, can be used as marriage gift. and the sacrifice, but profaned it is¹⁹⁹Since intentional sin is excluded from expiation by sacrifice, the rules of Lev. 5:14–16 do not apply.. Rebbi Ḥama bar Uqba in the name of Rebbi Yose ben Ḥanina: The excluded well-being offerings²⁰⁰Well-being offerings, which remain the property of the donor and of which only a small part is given to the altar and the priests, is excluded from the rules of Lev. 5:14–16, as will be explained immediately following. become profane without redemption. But did we not state²⁰¹Sifra Wayyiqra Pereq 20(1), referring to Lev. 5:15, speaking of larceny committed “from the Eternal’s sancta”. In rabbinic interpretation, prefix מ or מִן always implies “some, not all”. In this case, the verse is taken to refer to “the Eternal’s sancta”, no part of which is private property. This excludes well-being and other simple sacrifices but includes sacrifices given to the priests since these offerings always remain Heaven’s property (cf. Note 169).: “From the sancta,” not all sancta? That you say for the additional fifth and the sacrifice, but profaned it is¹⁹⁹Since intentional sin is excluded from expiation by sacrifice, the rules of Lev. 5:14–16 do not apply..