Talmud sur L’Exode 26:30

Those of Bar Pazi and (Bar) [Rebbi]³²⁸The text of L is in parentheses, the one from B in bracketrs. Since the second family is also called “R. Hoshaia’s” later in L, and the entire story makes sense only if this family was distinguished in learning, the reading from B has to be accepted. Hoshaia went and greeted the Patriarch every day. Those of Rebbi Hoshaia went in first [and left first]³²⁹Ex. 26:30. This argument is a legal argument of R. Immi’s in Šabbat 12:3 (13c l. 60). The Mishnah states that it is a prosecutable sin to write two letters on the Sabbath. Since the Sabbath prohibition is repeated after the instructions for building the Tabernacle (Ex. 31:12–17; 35:1–3) it is concluded that the forbidden actions on the Sabbath are exactly those which were necessary for the construction of the Tabernacle. R. Immi explains that all logs which formed the walls of the Tabernacle carried two letters and that sides bearing the same letters were put together when the Tabernacle was re-assembled after being transported. This is taken here as a sign that nothing should be changed; marrying into the family of the patriarch cannot erase the advantage conferred by learning.. Those of Bar Pazi went and became related by marriage to the patriarchate. They came and wanted to enter first. They went and asked Rebbi Immi. You shall erect the tabernacle according to its ruling³³⁰Ex. 26:30.. Does there exist a ruling for wood? But the log which merited to be put in the North should be put in the North, in the South should be put in the South.