Halakha Ulangan 22:3: Mishneh Torah, Robbery and Lost Property, Mishneh Torah, Negative Mitzvot & Sefer HaChinukh

וְכֵ֧ן תַּעֲשֶׂ֣ה לַחֲמֹר֗וֹ וְכֵ֣ן תַּעֲשֶׂה֮ לְשִׂמְלָתוֹ֒ וְכֵ֣ן תַּעֲשֶׂ֜ה לְכָל־אֲבֵדַ֥ת אָחִ֛יךָ אֲשֶׁר־תֹּאבַ֥ד מִמֶּ֖נּוּ וּמְצָאתָ֑הּ לֹ֥א תוּכַ֖ל לְהִתְעַלֵּֽם׃ (ס)

Demikian pula harus kaulakukan terhadap keledainya, demikian pula harus kaulakukan terhadap pakaiannya, dan demikian pula harus kaulakukan terhadap setiap barang saudaramu yang hilang darinya dan kautemukan; engkau tidak boleh berpura-pura tidak melihatnya.

Mishneh Torah, Robbery and Lost Property

Since a person's domain can acquire property on his behalf without his knowledge, as will be explained, why does the owner of this courtyard not acquire the treasure buried within the old wall even if it originally belonged to the Amorites, and thus he would become its legal owner?
Tanya RabiBookmarkShareCopy

Mishneh Torah, Robbery and Lost Property

Our Sages derived this concept as follows: With regard to a lost object, the Torah Deuteronomy 22:3 states: "That is lost by him and found." This refers to an article that the owner lost, but others can find, thus excluding an article that fell into the sea and is "lost to him and all others." Surely, this applies to an ancient treasure that the person never owned. It is certainly "lost to him and all others." Therefore, it belongs to the finder.
Tanya RabiBookmarkShareCopy

Mishneh Torah, Negative Mitzvot

Not to pretend not to have seen lost property, so as to save oneself the trouble of recovering it and restoring it to the owner, as it is said, “… thou mayest not hide thyself….” (Deut. 22:3).
Tanya RabiBookmarkShareCopy

Mishneh Torah, Negative Mitzvot

Hanya tersedia untuk anggota Premium