Midras Ulangan 5:19: Midrash Tehillim, Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Midrash Tanchuma & Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael

Another interpretation of “But his delight is in the Torah of God” (Psalms 1:2): This is what Scripture said, “Oh! Let all who are thirsty come for water, [and he who has no money, let him acquire [food] and eat it, and come and acquire without money, and without cost, wine and milk]” (Isaiah 55:1). Just as water comes from the heavens, as it is said, “When [God] bellows, there is a rumbling of water in the heavens” (Jeremiah 10:13); so too, words of Torah were given from the heavens, as it is said “You have seen for yourselves that I spoke with you from the heavens” (Exodus 20:19). Just as water is free to all, so too are words of Torah free for all, as it is said, “[let him who has no money] acquire [food] and eat it, and come and acquire without money, and without cost, wine and milk.” Just as water descends into the world with thunder and lightning, as it is said, “The voice of God is upon the waters” (Psalms 29:3), so too [regarding] words of Torah, “On the third day, as morning dawned, there was thunder, and lightning, [and a dense cloud upon the mountain, and a very loud blast of the horn; and all the people who were in the camp trembled]” (Exodus 19:16). Just as water [gives] life to all; so too, words of Torah [give] life to all, as it is said, “For they are [a source of] life to those who find them” (Proverbs 4:22). And it is written, “For this is not a trifling thing for you: [it is your very life]” (Deuteronomy 32:47). Just as water descends drop by drop only to form [great] rivers, so too [regarding] words of Torah. A person learns a single halakha one day, and a single halakha on the next day, until he becomes a flowing stream. Rabbi Oniya said, “What is water made for? To [water] gardens and orchards [irrespective of their quality]. Could it be that the same is true regarding words of Torah [that they enter the hearts of a person irrespective of their spiritual or ethical standing]? The verse states [otherwise, as it says,] “For the paths of God are upright; [the righteous can walk on them, while sinners stumble on them]” (Hosea 14:10). [As this teaching appears in Shir HaShirim Rabba 1:2:8, it says: “Rabbi Ḥanina of Caesarea said: Just as water is drawn to gardens, orchards, lavatories, and bathhouses, could it be that the same is true regarding words of Torah? The verse states [otherwise, as it says]: “For the ways of the Lord are upright; [the righteous can walk on them, while sinners stumble on them]” (Hosea 14:10).”] Rabbi [Yehuda Ha-Nassi] said, just as water covers the nakedness of the sea, so too words of Torah cover the nakedness of Israel, as it is said, “love covers up all faults” (Proverbs 10:12). Just as with water, an adult isn’t ashamed to ask a child to give him water to drink, so too with words of Torah, an adult isn’t embarrassed to ask a child to teach him a chapter or a halakha. Just as with water, if a person is thirsty for it, he won’t be too lazy to drink, so too with Torah, a student is not too lazy to go to his Rabbi to learn from him. There was a story of Rabbi Yossi who went to learn from his Rabbi, etc. [This is the Midrash alluding to a story that appears in Eruvin 47b – It teaches that a person, and even a priest, is allowed to leave the land of Israel in order to learn Torah from the teacher that is most suited to them. This Yossi (who is called Yosef in the Talmudic version of the story), was a priest based in Israel who travelled all the way to Tzidon, outside of Israel, to learn Torah from the teacher who was most suited to his style of learning, even though the greatest sage of that generation lived in Israel. Since the greatest sage didn’t suit Yossi’s style of learning, Yossi wasn’t too lazy to walk all the way to Tzidon, and to leave the holiness of the land of Israel]. Regarding that which is written “[Moses charged us with [observing] the Torah;] it is a heritage of the congregation of Jacob” (Deuteronomy 33:4): [it is a heritage] to all those that congregate with Jacob. [This entails that] even the convert that toils in the Torah is equal to a high priest, as it is said, “[You shall keep My laws and My rules,] which a person shall observe and live by them: [I am God]” (Leviticus 18:5). [The word “person,” in this context, is understood as applying to any human being, and thus:] Priests, Levites, and Israelites are not mentioned [in this context] but rather [any] person [including a convert]. See what is written, “The families of the scribes that dwelt at Jabez: [the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, the Sucathites; these are the Kenites who came from Hammath, father of the house of Rechab]” (I Chronicles 2:55). [The Talmud identifies these “Kenites” as the descendants of Jethro, the father-in-law of Moses, some of whom merited to sit as members of the Sanhedrin (Sotah 11a) – their status, as converts, did not get in the way of their becoming leading Torah sages]. And Shamaya and Avtalyion were descendants of Sisera [the Canaanite general], and they [nevertheless] taught Torah to the masses as members of the Great Assembly. Therefore it is written, “God spoke these words to your entire congregation” (Deuteronomy 5:19) [paying no heed to matters of status or pedigree].

The master said above: "All the seventy had prophesied once, and ceased; but these two did not cease to prophecy." Whence do we infer this? Shall we assume it from the following passage (Num. 11, 25) They prophesied V'lo yassoff, which means they never prophesied again. If so, then how will you explain the passage (Deut. 5, 19) "With a great voice V'lo yassoff?" Does this also mean that it was never heard again? [The Shechina was surely heard in later times]. We must therefore say Yassoff means "not ceased;" if so, then the above inference is gone! We infer it from this passage: "And they prophesied [in the past] while concerning Eldad and Medad it is written, "are prophesying" [present tense]. In regard to the statement that their prophecy was "Moses shall die," it is readily understood, for it is written (Num. 11, 28) My Lord Moses, forbid them. But according to him who said they prophesied about other things, why, then, should they be forbidden? Because it was not seemly for them thus to prophesy in the presence of Moses, which appears as if a scholar decides a question in the presence of his teacher. What is meant by the words, forbid them? He said to Moses: "Throw upon them the care for the public, and they will cease [to prophesy] by themselves."

Because she had covered her face did he think her a harlot? [Is it not the contrary?] R. Elazar said that this means: She had covered her face when she had been in his house, hence he did not know her." Therefore she was rewarded that from her descended kings and prophets — kings from David; and prophets, as R. Levi said: "A bride who is chaste in the house of her father-in-law, will be rewarded that kings and prophets will descend from her." Whence do we infer this? From Tamar When she was lead forth she sent to her father-in-law. The text should have the word Meutzeas, in the passive voice [instead of Motzes in the active voice]. R. Elazar said: This means that after she produced the signs [of the signet, scarf and staff], the Angel Samael came and removed them, then the Angel Gabriel came and brought them again and this is the meaning of the passage (Ps. 56 1) To the chief musician upon Joneth elem-re-chokin." Said R. Jochanan: "This means that after the signs were removed she became numb like a dove." (Ib., ib., ib.) Unto David a Michtam, i.e., of whom David went forth, who kept himself humble and plain to everyone. Could Michtam be explained in another way that he was born circumsized? Can Michtam be explained in another way that just when in his youth he humbled himself before a superior in order to study the Torah from him, so also when he was elevated, he kept himself meek before one who was greater than he in order to study the Torah? (Ib., ib.) And she sent to her father-in-law, saying, 'By the man who owns these,' etc., why did she not call him by his name? Said Mar Zutra b. Tubia in the name of Rab; others say R. Chana b. Bizna said in the name of R. Simon, the pious; still others say R. Jochanan said it in the name of R. Simon b. Jochai: "It is better for a man to be thrown into a fiery furnace than be the means of bringing another to shame in public. We infer this from Tamar." (Gen. 38, 25) (Ib., ib., ib.) Acknowledge I pray thee. Said R. Chama b. Chanina: "With the word Haker (acknowledged) did Juda inform his father [concerning Joseph's disappearance] and with the word Haker (acknowledge) was Juda informed of the bad tidings [concerning the affair of Tamar]; i.e., with the word Haker did Juda inform his father, (Ib. 37. 32) Hakerna (acknowledge), we pray thee, whether it be thy son's coat or not, and with the word Haker was Juda informed Haker (acknowledge) I pray thee to whom belong the signet, scarf, and staff!" Acknowledge, I pray thee, the word Nah means nothing else but pray. She thus said unto Juda: "I pray thee acknowledge thy Creator and do not avert thy eyes from me." And Juda acknowledged them. And this is meant by R. Chama b. Bizna, who said in the name of R. Simon the pious: "Joseph, who sanctified Heaven's name in secret was rewarded with only one additional letter of the name of the Holy One, praised be He, as it is written (Ps. 81) but Juda, who sanctified Heaven's name publicly was rewarded so that his entire name was equal to that of the Holy One, praised be He." As soon as he confessed and said, a Divine voice went forth and said: "Thou hast saved Tamar with her two children from being burnt in fire, I swear by thy life that I shall save through thy merits thy three sons from being burnt in fire." Who are they? Chanania, Mishael and Azaria. She it righteous, it is from me. How did he know it? A Divine voice went forth and said: "From me went forth the secret things." (Ib., ib., ib.) Said Samuel the senior, the father-in-law of R. Samuel b. Ama: "This means that since he knew her he never forsook her, for it is written (Deut. 5, 19) A great voice v'lo yassph. [Just as in the latter case it means for ever, so also does it mean in the former case] ."