Bagian Terkait Bilangan 5:22

HALAKHAH: “The following are recited,” etc. It is written⁸Num. 5:21. The argument being that this clause is redundant. The full verse reads: “The Cohen shall make the woman swear by a curse-oath, the Cohen shall tell the woman: …”.: “The Cohen shall tell the woman,” in any language she understands, the words of Rebbi Joshia. Rebbi Jonathan said to him, if she does not understand, how could she answer “Amen, Amen”⁹In Sifry Num. 12, the objection is attributed to R. Ismael, R. Joshia’s teacher, not to R. Jonathan, R. Joshia’s student. R. Ismael’s interpretation is that the Cohen has to go into all details of the proceedings. The Babli, 32b, is the only source which accepts R. Joshia’s derivation. Then the Babli, without mentioning names, follows R. Ismael’s interpretation but treats it as purely rabbinic.? But that he should not talk to her through an interpreter.

¹⁶⁶This paragraph and the next are also in Qiddušin 1:5 (fol. 60d). In the Babli, the parallel is Qiddušin 27b. From where did they learn rollover of oaths¹⁶⁷If a person is required to swear, the opposing party can add to the contents of the oath any statement similar to the one which causes the oath to be forced. For example, if a person has a monetary claim on another person for which he has partial proof, enough to force the opposing party to swear, he can add to the text of the oath of disclaimer any other financial claim which he might have but for which the proofs in his hand are not sufficient to force the defendant to swear. This is the topic of Qiddušin 1:5. It is seen in Mishnah 7 that some connection of the additions to the original claim is required.? From the suspected wife: “The woman shall say, Amen, Amen”; Amen from this man, Amen from any other man. That refers to subjects he is able to make her swear about¹⁶⁸While the husband must specify the name of the man he suspects of an affair with his wife in order to declare his jealousy and bring her to the Temple, he could have named any other man. Therefore, he can add the names of other men to the formula of the oath.. What about subjects he is not able to make her swear about? Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun said, let us hear from the following: “Amen that I was not deviant preliminarily married¹⁵⁵Cf. Yebamot, Chapter 1, Note 63; Peah Chapter 6, Note 46. and married, waiting for the levir and taken in¹⁵⁶If the first husband had died childless and the levir brings her to the Temple as his wife. Only R. Aqiba considers sexual relations of the not-yet-married widow a crime. All other authorities will remove the mention of the widow “waiting to be married by the levir”..” Can he make her swear when she is preliminarily married or waiting for the levir¹⁶⁹Mishnah 4:1 states that there is no declaration of jealousy admitted in these two cases since the ceremony applies only to “a wife under her husband (Num. 5:19)”. Nevertheless, the husband can force her to swear about her behavior when she was his wife but not under him.? Nevertheless one rolls over.

Some Tannaïm state: Since this one is subject to curse and oath, so also all who have to swear are under curse and oath. Some Tannaïm state: This one is subject to curse and oath, but no others who have to swear are under curse and oath. They wanted to say, the one who said, since this one is subject to curse and oath, so also all who have to swear are under curse and oath, is understandable. The one who said, this one is subject to curse and oath, but no others who have to swear are under curse and oath, can you infer for rollover only but not for oath? Some Tannaïm state: Since this one is subject to Amen, Amen, so also all who have to swear are under Amen, Amen. Some Tannaïm state: This one is subject to Amen, Amen, but no others who have to swear are under Amen, Amen. They wanted to say, the one who said, since this one is subject to Amen, Amen, so also all who have to swear are under Amen, Amen, is understandable. The one who said, this one is subject to Amen, Amen, but no others who have to swear are under Amen, Amen, did one not infer rollover of oaths from the suspected wife? Can you infer for rollover only but not for Amen, Amen?