Bagian Terkait Imamat 27:8

“In matters of real estate⁹⁷To determine the value of real estate dedicated to the Temple. Lev. 27:14–25; Tractate Arakhin. nine and a Cohen.” Corresponding to the ten times “Cohen” is mentioned in the paragraph¹⁰⁹The word “Cohen” is mentioned 3 times in Lev. 27:8, 2 times each in vv. 14,14, and once in vv. 11,21,23, for a total of 10.. Then should they not all be Cohanim? An inclusion after an inclusion is an exclusion¹¹⁰Therefore nconsecutive inclusions are an inclusion for nodd, an exclusion for neven. Babli 23b, Yoma43a.. Then could they all be Israel? The paragraph has no result without a Cohen. That is, if one dedicated the body of a field. But if he said, I am vowing the value of my field for the Temple, ¹¹¹This text is from Sanhedrin1:4, discussing Mishnah 1:4 quoted in this sentence. let us hear from the following: “Appraisal of movables by three {appraisers}.” Do there exist appraisals not of movables¹¹²By definition, “appraisals” refers to the sums of money detailed in Lev.27:1–8. Money always is movable.? Rebbi Jacob bar Aḥa, Rebbi Simeon bar Abba in the name of Rebbi Ḥanina: If somebody says, I am vowing my appraisal, and comes to settle his debt by real estate, one appraises it by ten {persons}, by movables by three¹¹³Real estate by the rules of Mishnah Megillah4:4, movables by Sanhedrin1:4.. Is one who says, I am vowing my appraisal not like one who says, I am vowing my field’s value¹¹⁴Since the rules of appraisal are the same in both categories.? But if he said, I am vowing a hundred mina for the Temple, one appraises him by three. Should he become rich, he will be judged by what he can afford¹¹⁵This is difficult to understand; since the text is confirmed by two copies, it cannot be emended. By biblical law, a reduction of payments for the poor is mandated only for appraisals (Lev.27:8), not for dedications of specified sums. The reduction, based on what he can afford, is determined by a committee of three which must include a Cohen. If the poor person paid only part of the reduced sum and then becomes rich, the original sum is reinstated as soon as he can afford it. If the poor person made his vow (in the Megillah version for 100 minas) in order to induce God to make him rich so he may fulfill his vow, it might be in the interest of the Temple to wait with the collection of the debt until the person became affluent..