Bagian Terkait Ulangan 12:9

Rebbi Phineas in the name of Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Ila`y. One verse says, he abandoned the dwelling at Shilo<sup>558</sup>Ps. 78:60. The argument is based on the second part of the verse, a Tent He made dwell among mankind., but an other verse says, she brought him to the Eternal’s House at Shilo<sup>559</sup>1Sam. 1:25.. How is this? A stone house below and the gobelins on top<sup>560</sup>The three layers of covers of the Tent of Meeting were drawn over a stone wall. Babli Zevaḥim 118a., and this was “rest.<sup>561</sup>Private altars are prohibited in Deut. 12:9 when Israel comes to the rest and the inheritance. “Rest” is defined as Shilo, “inheritance” as Jerusalem. Babli 10a.” Rebbi Ze`ira said, a minimum of ten hand-breadths, as in building a house. But was it not stated, just as the Tent of Meeting was erected so was the Tent at Shilo erected? Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun said, its poles, its planks, its latches, its bases, and its columns⁵⁶²Ex. 39:33.. Its poles were visible inside like stars in the sky.

I could think that they may fulfill their obligation with flat cakes for a thanksgiving offering and wafers of a nazir. The verse says, seven days you shall eat mazzot⁵⁸⁸Ex. 12:15.; mazzah which may be eaten all seven days. This excludes thanksgiving offering and wafers of a nazir which may not be eaten all seven days. Rebbi Jonah in the name of Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish: since flat cakes for a thanksgiving offering and (goats) [wafers]⁵⁸⁹The scribe’s text clearly is in error. of a nazir may be eaten in the entire domain of the Land of Israel, the presenter could not exclude because of “dwelling place”. Rebbi Yose in the name of Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish: this implies that wafers of a nazir may be eaten in the entire domain of the Land of Israel, the presenter could not exclude because of “dwelling place”. One understands about flat cakes for a thanksgiving offering. But it is not so for wafers of a nazir. Rebbi Joḥanan said, there is no nazir here; nezirut is an obligation⁵²⁷May be brought on a private altar. Babli Temurah 14b.. Rebbi Abun bar Cahana said, explain it if his purification offering was presented in Shiloh but his elevation and well-being offerings in Nob or Gibeon. Rebbi Ḥananiah, Rebbi Ezrah asked before Rebbi Mana: Did not the teacher say in the name of Rebbi Yose: Holiday well-being offerings brought at an elevated place are qualified but they are not counted against an obligation of the owner? But it must be for Rebbi Jehudah, as Rebbi Jehudah said, purification and Passover offerings of individuals at a principal elevated place, but no purification and Passover offerings of individuals at a private altar. It only follows Rebbi Simeon, since “Rebbi Simeon said, when one of the bloods was sprinkled, the nazir is permitted to drink wine and to defile himself for the dead.⁵⁹⁰Mishnah Nazir 6:11. Therefore only the first sacrifice of the nazir is obligatory, the others together with the bread may be offered locally.”