וְאִם־אֱמֶ֣ת הָיָ֔ה הַדָּבָ֖ר הַזֶּ֑ה לֹא־נִמְצְא֥וּ בְתוּלִ֖ים לנער [לַֽנַּעֲרָֽה׃]
Tetapi jika tuduhan itu benar, bahwa tanda-tanda keperawanan tidak didapati pada gadis itu,
Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin
118his now refers to the adulterous definitively married woman. A closely related text is Ketubot 4:7, Notes 154–160. Rebbi Jehudah ben Pazi said. not only to the bridal chamber but also to a house containing the bridal chamber119Where the definitive marriage is contracted. This חוּפָּה is not the wedding canopy used today, but a room where the newlyweds will consummate the marriage and spend the following week.
From here to the end of Sanhedrin-Makkot (except Makkot 1:13–2:7) there exists a Genizah fragment (G) edited (with readings compared to the Krotoschin Yerushalmi) by S. Wieder, Tarbiz 17 (1946) 130–135.. The following is problematic: Dining room120Greek τρικλίνιον, τó, Latin triclinium. and bedroom121Cf. Chapter 7:19, Note 363., bridal chamber and bedroom; if she entered the dining room, for which consequence122Before the definitive marriage ceremony.? Rebbi Joḥanan said, to inherit from her123As definitive husband, if the woman died before entering the bridal chamber. Since this idea is not followed up, it does not represent practice. In Ketubot, the name is R. Eleazar. Therefore, the illegible name in G cannot be emended to “R. Johanan” as given in Tarbiz 17.. Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, to dissolve her vows124Nedarim, Chapters 10,11.. Rebbi Zeˋira said, even though Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, to dissolve her vows, he agrees that he cannot actually dissolve them before she enters the bridal chamber125If the time allotted to the husband to dissolve his wife’s vows elapses between the arrival of his bride at his home when she stated the fact of her vows and the definitive marriage ceremony, he lost his right of dissolution.. Rebbi Huna126In G, “Huna” is corrected to “Jonah”. said, a verse supports Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish: to whore in her father’s house127Deut. 22:21.. This excludes the case where the father’s agents handed her over to the husband’s agents, that she could not be stoned, but is strangled128A preliminarily married virgin who no longer is in her father's charge is treated in criminal law as if she already were definitively married. Babli Ketubot 49a ..
From here to the end of Sanhedrin-Makkot (except Makkot 1:13–2:7) there exists a Genizah fragment (G) edited (with readings compared to the Krotoschin Yerushalmi) by S. Wieder, Tarbiz 17 (1946) 130–135.. The following is problematic: Dining room120Greek τρικλίνιον, τó, Latin triclinium. and bedroom121Cf. Chapter 7:19, Note 363., bridal chamber and bedroom; if she entered the dining room, for which consequence122Before the definitive marriage ceremony.? Rebbi Joḥanan said, to inherit from her123As definitive husband, if the woman died before entering the bridal chamber. Since this idea is not followed up, it does not represent practice. In Ketubot, the name is R. Eleazar. Therefore, the illegible name in G cannot be emended to “R. Johanan” as given in Tarbiz 17.. Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, to dissolve her vows124Nedarim, Chapters 10,11.. Rebbi Zeˋira said, even though Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, to dissolve her vows, he agrees that he cannot actually dissolve them before she enters the bridal chamber125If the time allotted to the husband to dissolve his wife’s vows elapses between the arrival of his bride at his home when she stated the fact of her vows and the definitive marriage ceremony, he lost his right of dissolution.. Rebbi Huna126In G, “Huna” is corrected to “Jonah”. said, a verse supports Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish: to whore in her father’s house127Deut. 22:21.. This excludes the case where the father’s agents handed her over to the husband’s agents, that she could not be stoned, but is strangled128A preliminarily married virgin who no longer is in her father's charge is treated in criminal law as if she already were definitively married. Babli Ketubot 49a ..