וַיֹּאמֶר֮ הָֽאָדָם֒ זֹ֣את הַפַּ֗עַם עֶ֚צֶם מֵֽעֲצָמַ֔י וּבָשָׂ֖ר מִבְּשָׂרִ֑י לְזֹאת֙ יִקָּרֵ֣א אִשָּׁ֔ה כִּ֥י מֵאִ֖ישׁ לֻֽקֳחָה־זֹּֽאת׃
Lalu manusia itu berkata, “Kali ini, inilah tulang dari tulangku dan daging dari dagingku; ia akan dinamai perempuan, sebab ia diambil dari laki-laki.”
Allegorical Interpretation of Genesis
[44] “To this one shall be given the title ‘woman’ ” (Gen. 2:23), as much as to say, for this cause shall perception be called “woman” because out of man that sets it in motion “this one is taken.” Why, then is “this one” put in? Because there is another perception, not taken from the mind, but brought into being together with it. For there are, as I have said already, two perceptions, one existing as quiescent condition, the other as activity. The one, then, that exists as quiescent condition, is not taken out of the man, that is to say the mind, but comes into being with it.
The Midrash of Philo
Why, when the man saw the woman who had been formed in this manner, he proceeded to say: "She" (for "this," touto) "is now bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called woman, because she has been taken out of man?" (Genesis 2:23).