Rujukan Talmud untuk Bilangan 15:17: Jerusalem Talmud Challah

HALAKHAH: “Foreign produce,” etc. It is written (Num. 15:17) “To the Land into which I am bringing you.¹“When you come into the Land into which I am bringing you, (v. 18) it shall be that on the occasion of your eating from the bread of the Land you shall lift a heave for the Eternal.”” There you are obligated, you are not obligated outside the Land. It was stated: These are the words of Rebbi Meïr. But the words of Rebbi Jehudah²Who is a better authority than R. Meïr. The same statement in Sifry Num. 110. In Ma‘serot 5:4 (Note 83), R. Jehudah’s interpretation of the position of R. Aqiba is presented as genuine. are: Foreign produce imported into the Land, Rebbi Eliezer declares it free but Rebbi Aqiba declares it obligated. What is the reason of Rebbi Eliezer? (Num. 15:18) “From the Land’s bread,” not foreign bread. What is the reason of Rebbi Aqiba? (Num. 15:17) “To the Land into which I am bringing you.” There you are obligated, both for produce of the Land and foreign produce.”

How does Rebbi Eliezer explain the reason of Rebbi Aqiba, (Num. 15:17) “To the Land into which I am bringing you?” The colleagues in the name of Rebbi Eleazar, Rebbi Abba in the name of Rebbi Eleazar, Rebbi Hila in the name of Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish: So did Rebbi Aqiba object to Rebbi Eliezer: Do you not agree that when Israel entered the Land and found there coarse and fine flour³R. Simson and R. Solomon ben Adrat read: “(coarse) flour and doughs”. This is from a textual tradition different from our mss.; it is very likely a late change since (a) in talmudic Hebrew, קמח means only “coarse flour”; the re-emergence of the biblical meaning “flour” (irrespective of quality) is definitely Medieval rabbinic; (b) only R. Aqiba (later in this Halakhah and in Mishnah 3:5) moves the obligation of ḥallah from kneading the dough to baking it. It is unreasonable to expect R. Eliezer to accept this position. that this was subject to ḥallah? Did it not grow while exempt? He accepted that⁴As seen later, without giving up his interpretation of the verses for current practice.. Rebbi Yose said, I am wondering how could Rebbi Aqiba object to Rebbi Eliezer and how could the latter accept it? There, before they entered they had inherited it retroactively, as Rebbi Huna said in the name of Rebbi Samuel ben Naḥman: It is not written “to your posterity I shall give” but (Gen. 15:18): “to your posterity I gave”, I already gave it.

“If it was exported¹⁴Outside the Land of Israel., Rebbi Eliezer declares it obligated but Rebbi Aqiba declares it free.” They said, Rebbi Eliezer [is explained] from his quote, Rebbi Aqiba from his quote. Rebbi Eliezer from his quote; what is the reason of Rebbi Eliezer? (Num. 15:18) “From the Land’s bread,” wherever it may be. Rebbi Aqiba from his quote; What is the reason of Rebbi Aqiba? (Num. 15:17) “To the Land into which I am bringing you;” there you are obligated; you are not obligated outside the Land.