Rujukan Talmud untuk Bilangan 15:4: Jerusalem Talmud Shekalim & Jerusalem Talmud Sukkah

HALAKHAH: And following Ben Azzai, why the [poor]⁷⁶Corrector’s addition from B. sinner? He brought his log with him, and following the rabbis he brings a lamb⁷⁷As explained in Note 75.. What are the libations for a mother sheep⁷⁸Since there is a difference between the libations needed for a young male sheep and those for an adult male, why does one not make the same distinction for females?? Since we stated, “ ‘lamb’ serves for the libations of sheep and goats, large or small, male or female,” this implies that the libations of a mother sheep are like the libations of a lamb. It is written⁷⁹Num. 15:11., so you shall do for one bull, or for one ram, or an animal from sheep or goats.⁸⁰Sifry Num.107. This tells that He did not differentiate between libations for a calf and libations for a bull. Since one could argue, an animal from the flock needs libations, a bovine animal needs libations. Since we find that He distinguished between the libations for a sheep and the libations for a ram, so we should differentiate between libations for a calf and libations for a bull. The verse says, so you shall do for one bull; this implies that He did not distinguish between libations for a calf and libations for a bull. Why was it said, or for a ram? Since one could argue, if we find that He differentiated between libations for a yearling and libations for a two-year old, so we should differentiate between libations for a two-years old and a three-years old. The verse says, or for one ram. Why was it said, or for an animal from sheep? Since one could argue, if we find that He differentiated between libations for a sheep and libations for a ram, so we should differentiate between libations for a young female sheep and libations for a mother sheep. The verse says, or for an animal from sheep. Why was it said, or a goat? Since one could argue, if we find that He differentiated between libations for a sheep and libations for a ram, so we should differentiate between libations for a kid goat and libations for a bellwether. The verse says, or for a goat, it compared the smallest kid goat to the largest bellwether⁸¹The distinction by age applicable to sheep is not applicable to goats.. Since one needs three log, so the other needs three log.

Rebbi Yose⁹⁴With B read: Yasa (Assi). said, Rebbi Joḥanan asked: Entire in the morning and entire in the evening, or half in the morning and half in the evening, [or entire in the morning and nothing in the evening]⁹⁵The High Priest has to bring a fIour offering mornings and evenings (Lev. 6:13). If the High Priest is dead or disabled and according to the Mishnah his flour offering has to be brought entire, does that mean two offerings per day, or only one in the morning? It is clear that the sentence about bringing two halves has to be deleted and the corrector’s addition from B accepted.? Then it should be obvious to him, what about three log⁹⁶The text about the High Priest’s offering only mentions oil but does not specify its quantity. It is deduced either from the libations required in general for a sheep (Num. 15:4) or from the specifics indicated for the daily sacrifice (Num. 28:5) that a tenth of an ephah of flour requires a quarter of a hin, 3 log, of olive oil. This therefore is the quantity of oil required here, even though it is used for frying, not for mixing as in the cases where the quantities are specified. Sifra Ṣaw Pereq4:1–5; cf. Babli Menaḥot52b.? Three log in the morning and three log in the afternoon, or a log and a half in the morning and a log and a half in the afternoon? Rebbi Ḥizqiah said, also the following was a problem for him: Two handful⁹⁷In the Babli, Menaḥot52a, R. Joḥanan reports that the Tenth of the High Priest also requires addition of a handful of incense like other flour offerings. He also reports that there is a dispute whether the living High Priest has to bring one handful, which is split into two, or two separate handfuls for morning and evening services. But since here the question is about the Tenth for the absent or incapacitated High Priest, one infers that the Yerushalmi holds that the living High Priest only brings one handful. in the morning and two handful in the evening or one handful in the morning and one handful in the evening? Rebbi Yose said, did they not the two handful infer from the sinner’s flour offering⁹⁸This reading is impossible since the sinner’s flour offering (Lev. 5:11) is brought without oil and incense. The commentators conjecture an emendation “from the shew bread” which is put onto the table in two rows, each one with a cup of incense.? Just as there two handful, also here two handful. Just as there it was problematic for him, so here it is problematic for him⁹⁹Missing in B and M, probably correctly.. Rebbi Ḥizqiah said, did one not infer the three log from the daily afternoon sacrifice⁹⁶The text about the High Priest’s offering only mentions oil but does not specify its quantity. It is deduced either from the libations required in general for a sheep (Num. 15:4) or from the specifics indicated for the daily sacrifice (Num. 28:5) that a tenth of an ephah of flour requires a quarter of a hin, 3 log, of olive oil. This therefore is the quantity of oil required here, even though it is used for frying, not for mixing as in the cases where the quantities are specified. Sifra Ṣaw Pereq4:1–5; cf. Babli Menaḥot52b.? Since there {are} three log, so also here three log. [Just as] there it was problematic for him, [so] here it is (obvious) [problematic] for him1⁰⁰.

There, we have stated⁹⁹Mishnah Zevaḥim 13:6.: “Rebbi Eleazar¹⁰⁰The Tanna, ben Shamua. says, also one who pours a libation of water on Tabernacles outside of the Temple is liable¹⁰¹As a matter of principle, any sacrifice outside the Temple conducted in the way it is biblically prescribed for the Temple is a deadly sin and if performed inadvertently makes the person liable for a purification sacrifice. To state that making a water libation outside the Temple creates such a liability for the performer is stating that the libation in the Temple is biblically prescribed..” Rebbi Joḥanan said¹⁰²Babli Zevaḥim 110b., the entire system of Rebbi Eleazar is the system of his teacher Rebbi Aqiba. Just as Rebbi Aqiba said, the water libation is a word from the Torah, so Rebbi Eleazar is saying, the water libation is a word from the Torah. There are Tannaim who state in the name of Rebbi Eleazar, it is necessary that the filling be for the holiday; there are Tannaim who state in the name of Rebbi Eleazar, it is not necessary that the filling be for the holiday¹⁰³Since anything sacrificed on the altar needs a dedication, and using Temple vessels for not dedicated contents is sinful, if the water libation is a biblical requirement it needs a Temple vessel and dedication of the water at the moment of filling for the holiday. If the water libation is tradition, it does not have to be drawn for its purpose from the start.. He who said, it is necessary that the filling be for the holiday, Rebbi Eleazar following Rebbi Aqiba; he who said, it is not necessary that the filling be for the holiday, Rebbi Eleazar following the rabbis. This you cannot say since Rebbi Joḥanan said, the entire system of Rebbi Eleazar is the system of his teacher Rebbi Aqiba. Just as Rebbi Aqiba said, the water libation is a word from the Torah, so Rebbi Eleazar is saying, the water libation is a word from the Torah. What is the difference between them? Rebbi Ze`ira said, only if he poured three log inside and three log outside¹⁰⁴This statement is elliptic. It can be read parallel to a statement of R. Simeon ben Laqish in the Babli Zevaḥim 110b as stating that since in the Temple the libation is only valid if it is of exactly three log (a quarter of a hin, the smallest admissible libation of wine, Num. 15:4), also outside it creates liability only if it is exactly 3 log.. There are Tannaim who state, there is prescribed measure; there are Tannaim who state, there is no prescribed measure. He who said that there is prescribed measure, not liable¹⁰⁵If the measure is not exactly 3 log, since inside the Temple this is a biblical obligation.; he who said there is no prescribed measure, liable¹⁰⁶In any amount, since inside the ceremony is tradition, not Scripture..