Rujukan Talmud untuk Bilangan 32:29: Jerusalem Talmud Nedarim, Jerusalem Talmud Kiddushin, Jerusalem Talmud Eruvin & Jerusalem Talmud Demai

MISHNAH: These are the vows which he may dissolve: Matters connected with mortification¹In addition, he can dissolve vows impinging on their marital relations, as explained later.. [E. g.], “if I wash, if I do not wash; if I wear jewels, if I do not wear jewels.²These examples refer to conditional vows. One derives from the contract of the tribes of Gad and Reuben with Moses (Num. 32:29–30) that a legally valid conditional contract must spell out the conditions both positively and negatively: If I do certain things, there is a stipulated consequence; if I do not, then the consequence is stipulated not to happen (Mishnah Qiddušin 3:3). The vow is understood to be: A qônām should be a certain thing for me if I ever wash; if I do not wash, the thing shall not be qônām. Since not washing is mortification, the husband has the right to void the vow. If the vow had been unconditional, the husband would have no jurisdiction over it.” Rebbi Yose said, these are not vows of mortification³His position is explained in Mishnah 2..

MISHNAH: “On condition¹⁰⁶He gives the woman a peruṭah as marriage gift and specifies that he preliminarily marries her as owner of a bet kor, 30 bet se‘ah or 75’000 square cubits of agricultural land. If he actually is the owner of the land, she is married immediately; he can show her the title to his land later. that I possess a bet kor of arable land,” she is preliminarily married if he owns it. “On condition that I possess it at place X”, she is preliminarily married if he owns it at place X, otherwise she is not preliminarily married. “On condition that I shall show you a bet kor of arable land,” she is preliminarily married and he has to show her¹⁰⁷Since he said “to show”, it means that she has to see it with her own eyes; it is not enough for him to prove his ownership to her., but if he showed it in the valley¹⁰⁸בִּקְעָא everywhere means open agricultural land not easily accessible. In all these conditions, a claim of ownership is understood. she is not preliminarily married. ¹⁰⁹In the independent Mishnah mss. and later in the Halakhah here starts a new Mishnah 4. Rebbi Meïr says, any condition which is not formulated in the manner of the condition imposed on the tribes of Gad and Reuben is invalid¹⁰⁹In the independent Mishnah mss. and later in the Halakhah here starts a new Mishnah 4., as it is said¹¹¹Num. 32:29–30.: “Moses said to them, if the tribes of Gad and Reuben cross over … but if they will not in arms cross over with you, etc.” Rebbi Ḥananiah ben Gamliel said, that formulation was necessary¹¹²The involved formulation of the deed of Transjordan to the tribes of Gad and Reuben was necessary under the circumstances. A simple condition is valid; it is not necessary for a man to say: “Be preliminarily married to me on condition that I possess a bet kor of arable land, but be not preliminarily married to me if I do not possess a bet kor of arable land.” for otherwise one would have understood that even in the Land of Canaan they should not inherit.

MISHNAH: “On condition¹⁰⁶He gives the woman a peruṭah as marriage gift and specifies that he preliminarily marries her as owner of a bet kor, 30 bet se‘ah or 75’000 square cubits of agricultural land. If he actually is the owner of the land, she is married immediately; he can show her the title to his land later. that I possess a bet kor of arable land,” she is preliminarily married if he owns it. “On condition that I possess it at place X”, she is preliminarily married if he owns it at place X, otherwise she is not preliminarily married. “On condition that I shall show you a bet kor of arable land,” she is preliminarily married and he has to show her¹⁰⁷Since he said “to show”, it means that she has to see it with her own eyes; it is not enough for him to prove his ownership to her., but if he showed it in the valley¹⁰⁸בִּקְעָא everywhere means open agricultural land not easily accessible. In all these conditions, a claim of ownership is understood. she is not preliminarily married. ¹⁰⁹In the independent Mishnah mss. and later in the Halakhah here starts a new Mishnah 4. Rebbi Meïr says, any condition which is not formulated in the manner of the condition imposed on the tribes of Gad and Reuben is invalid¹⁰⁹In the independent Mishnah mss. and later in the Halakhah here starts a new Mishnah 4., as it is said¹¹¹Num. 32:29–30.: “Moses said to them, if the tribes of Gad and Reuben cross over … but if they will not in arms cross over with you, etc.” Rebbi Ḥananiah ben Gamliel said, that formulation was necessary¹¹²The involved formulation of the deed of Transjordan to the tribes of Gad and Reuben was necessary under the circumstances. A simple condition is valid; it is not necessary for a man to say: “Be preliminarily married to me on condition that I possess a bet kor of arable land, but be not preliminarily married to me if I do not possess a bet kor of arable land.” for otherwise one would have understood that even in the Land of Canaan they should not inherit.