וְהָאִישׁ֩ אֲשֶׁר־ה֨וּא טָה֜וֹר וּבְדֶ֣רֶךְ לֹא־הָיָ֗ה וְחָדַל֙ לַעֲשׂ֣וֹת הַפֶּ֔סַח וְנִכְרְתָ֛ה הַנֶּ֥פֶשׁ הַהִ֖וא מֵֽעַמֶּ֑יהָ כִּ֣י ׀ קָרְבַּ֣ן יְהוָ֗ה לֹ֤א הִקְרִיב֙ בְּמֹ֣עֲד֔וֹ חֶטְא֥וֹ יִשָּׂ֖א הָאִ֥ישׁ הַהֽוּא׃
Tetapi orang yang tahir dan tidak sedang dalam perjalanan, namun lalai melaksanakan kurban Pesakh, orang itu harus dilenyapkan dari antara kaumnya, karena ia tidak mempersembahkan kurban Yang Mahakekal pada waktu yang telah ditetapkan untuknya; orang itu harus menanggung dosanya sendiri.
Jerusalem Talmud Pesachim
HALAKHAH: “He who was impure,” etc. Impure by a corpse5Num. 9:10., I not only have impure by a corpse, from where forced or in error? The verse says, every man, [it added]6Babli 93a.. So far following Rebbi Aqiba; following Rebbi Ismael? Rebbi Ismael stated, impure by a corpse is not equal to a far-away trip, nor is a far-away trip equal to impure by a corpse, what is common to them7This is the third hermeneutical principle of R. Ismael. Sifry Num. 69, Tosephta 8:2 (in the name of R. Aqiba); Targum Pseudo-Jonathan 9:10. is that he did not make the First and shall make the Second; also I am adding those forced or in error who did not make the First that they shall make the Second. Intentional from where? Rebbi Zeˋira said, but the man, to add the one acting intentionally8Num. 9:13: But the man who was pure.
This contradicts the position of R. Aqiba in the Tosephta, that both those impure by a corpse and those on a far trip are prevented from making the First Pesaḥ and therefore the third hermeneutical principle excludes the one who intentionally omitted the First even though he was pure and not far away. Cf. Babli 93a/b.. We have stated; “if in error or by force;” Rebbi Ḥiyya stated, “if in error, or by force, or intentional.9Tosephta 8:1.” Rebbi Yose said, the Mishnah implies this, “because these are not liable for extirpation but those are liable for extirpation;” who is subject to extirpation if not intentional?
This contradicts the position of R. Aqiba in the Tosephta, that both those impure by a corpse and those on a far trip are prevented from making the First Pesaḥ and therefore the third hermeneutical principle excludes the one who intentionally omitted the First even though he was pure and not far away. Cf. Babli 93a/b.. We have stated; “if in error or by force;” Rebbi Ḥiyya stated, “if in error, or by force, or intentional.9Tosephta 8:1.” Rebbi Yose said, the Mishnah implies this, “because these are not liable for extirpation but those are liable for extirpation;” who is subject to extirpation if not intentional?
Jerusalem Talmud Pesachim
31This paragraph also appears in Qiddušin 1:7, Notes 612–623. The origin probably is here. Rebbi Eleazar said: The Pesaḥ of women is voluntary32S. Liebermann has emphasized repeatedly that in the Yerushalmi רְשׁוּתmeans “meritorious act which is not obligatory.” The Babli disagrees in the name of R. Eliezer, 91a.
In the Babli and related texts, it is taken for granted that women present in Jerusalem on Passover eve are obligated to take part in the Passover meal, based on Ex. 12:4 which designates the participants as “persons”, not “men” (Mekhilta dR. Ismael, Pisḥa 3, Mekhilta dR. Simeon ben Yoḥai p. 10; cf. Mishnah 8:1,7 Tosephta 8:10; Babli 91a/b.) But it should be noted that missing the sacrificial meal is a deadly sin only for men (Num. 9:13); only men are required (and permitted) to make up the missed sacrifice on the 14th of Iyar (Num. 9:13; Tosephta 8:10).
The statement means that an unaffiliated female, living neither in her father’s nor a husband’s house, is not obligated to seek a group with which to celebrate Passover. It would be considered most inappropriate if a single woman would join a group of men unrelated to her. But since she is included in the circle of celebrants of Passover by biblical law, if she alone or a group of similarly situated women want to organize their own Pesaḥ and meal, they are authorized to do so.
Circumcised slaves are included in the group of Passover celebrants in Ex. 12:44. The owner of uncircumcised slaves is prohibited from bringing a Pesaḥ., but one pushes the Sabbath away for it33Since women are biblically empowered to celebrate Passover, the rule also applies to groups of women.. Rebbi Jacob bar Aḥa in the name of Rebbi Eleazar: The Passover sacrifice from women and slaves is voluntary; certainly one does push the Sabbath away for it. What is their mazzah? Rebbi Eleazar said, it is obligatory. Rebbi Zeˋira said, it is voluntary34In Qiddušin: This is in dispute.. Rebbi Hila said, it is everybody’s {opinion}. A baraita supports the one and a baraita supports the other. A baraita supports Rebbi Zeˋira: Lettuce, mazzah and Pesaḥ are obligatory the first night; on all other days they are voluntary. A baraita supports Rebbi Hila: It was said: Do not eat leavened matter with it, for seven days you shall eat with it mazzot, the bread of deprivation35Deut 17:3. Rules stated in the same verse must be of one and the same category.. Anybody under the prohibition of leavened matter is under the obligation to eat mazzah, and women, being under the prohibition of leavened matter, are under the obligation to eat mazzah36In the Babli, 91b, this is a statement by R. Eleazar, probably the Tanna. In Sifry Deut. 130, its contrapositive is a statement of R. Simeon.. But did we not state: “For any positive commandment triggered by time, men are obligated but women are free”37Mishnah Qiddušin 1:7.? Rebby Mana said, it is a powerful positive commandment since it is implied by a prohibition38And therefore follow the rules of prohibitions, obligatory for women..
In the Babli and related texts, it is taken for granted that women present in Jerusalem on Passover eve are obligated to take part in the Passover meal, based on Ex. 12:4 which designates the participants as “persons”, not “men” (Mekhilta dR. Ismael, Pisḥa 3, Mekhilta dR. Simeon ben Yoḥai p. 10; cf. Mishnah 8:1,7 Tosephta 8:10; Babli 91a/b.) But it should be noted that missing the sacrificial meal is a deadly sin only for men (Num. 9:13); only men are required (and permitted) to make up the missed sacrifice on the 14th of Iyar (Num. 9:13; Tosephta 8:10).
The statement means that an unaffiliated female, living neither in her father’s nor a husband’s house, is not obligated to seek a group with which to celebrate Passover. It would be considered most inappropriate if a single woman would join a group of men unrelated to her. But since she is included in the circle of celebrants of Passover by biblical law, if she alone or a group of similarly situated women want to organize their own Pesaḥ and meal, they are authorized to do so.
Circumcised slaves are included in the group of Passover celebrants in Ex. 12:44. The owner of uncircumcised slaves is prohibited from bringing a Pesaḥ., but one pushes the Sabbath away for it33Since women are biblically empowered to celebrate Passover, the rule also applies to groups of women.. Rebbi Jacob bar Aḥa in the name of Rebbi Eleazar: The Passover sacrifice from women and slaves is voluntary; certainly one does push the Sabbath away for it. What is their mazzah? Rebbi Eleazar said, it is obligatory. Rebbi Zeˋira said, it is voluntary34In Qiddušin: This is in dispute.. Rebbi Hila said, it is everybody’s {opinion}. A baraita supports the one and a baraita supports the other. A baraita supports Rebbi Zeˋira: Lettuce, mazzah and Pesaḥ are obligatory the first night; on all other days they are voluntary. A baraita supports Rebbi Hila: It was said: Do not eat leavened matter with it, for seven days you shall eat with it mazzot, the bread of deprivation35Deut 17:3. Rules stated in the same verse must be of one and the same category.. Anybody under the prohibition of leavened matter is under the obligation to eat mazzah, and women, being under the prohibition of leavened matter, are under the obligation to eat mazzah36In the Babli, 91b, this is a statement by R. Eleazar, probably the Tanna. In Sifry Deut. 130, its contrapositive is a statement of R. Simeon.. But did we not state: “For any positive commandment triggered by time, men are obligated but women are free”37Mishnah Qiddušin 1:7.? Rebby Mana said, it is a powerful positive commandment since it is implied by a prohibition38And therefore follow the rules of prohibitions, obligatory for women..
Jerusalem Talmud Pesachim
HALAKHAH: Rebbi Simeon said, the Great Rebbi Ḥiyya and bar Qappara disagreed. One said, that he could come and eat34A person is not ”far away” to be absolved from participating in the First Pesaḥ if he can reach the walled city of Jerusalem in time for the eating of the Pesaḥ, i. e., between nightfall and midnight.; the other one said that he could come and pour35He must be there at the time of pouring the blood at the altar walls, in the late afternoon.. And even following him who said, that he could come and eat; on condition that he be within the two thousand cubits of the [Sabbath] domain before nightfall36Since on the holiday he is not permitted to walk more than 2’000 cubits from the place at which he started the holiday, it is clear that nobody farther than 2’000 cubits from Jerusalem at sundown can participate.. Rebbi Zeˋira said, there37In Babylonia. In the text of the extracts from the Yerushalmi in Yalqut Šimony published by L. Ginzberg in his Genizah Fragments (p. 321): “Tannaim state.” they stated, if he happened to be closer than Modiˋin but his feet were bad, I could think that he be liable, the verse said, he refrained38Num. 9:13., this excludes one who did not refrain. If he happened to be farther than Modiˋin but had a horse at his disposal, I could think that he be liable, the verse said, and he was not on a trip, this excludes this one who was on a trip. If he happened to be closer than Modiˋin before noontime but left before noontime, I could think that he be liable, the verse said, he refrained from doing, he who refrains at the time of doing is liable, not at the time of doing is not liable.