Rujukan Talmud untuk Bilangan 9:2: Jerusalem Talmud Pesachim

HALAKHAH: “The following items about the Pesaḥ,” etc. ⁷Babli 66a; Tosephta 4:13–14. This question left the Elders of Bathyra at a loss. Once the Fourteenth fell on the Sabbath and they did not know whether Pesaḥ pushes aside the Sabbath or not. They said, we have here a Babylonian who served Shemaya and Avtalion⁸The heads of the Pharisaic establishment in the preceding generation. and knows whether Pesaḥ pushes aside the Sabbath or not. It is possible that there be hope from him. They sent and called him. The said to him, did you ever hear, if the Fourteenth falls on the Sabbath, whether Pesaḥ pushes aside the Sabbath or not? He told them, do we have only one Pesaḥ which pushes aside the Sabbath every year? Are there not many Pesaḥim which push aside the Sabbath every year? There are Tannaim who state: 100. There are Tannaim who state: 200. There are Tannaim who state: 300. He who says 100, the daily sacrifices of the Sabbath. He who says 200, the daily and additional sacrifices of the Sabbath. He who says 300, the daily and additional sacrifices of the Sabbath, and of holidays, and of New Moons, and of semi-holidays. They told him, already we said, there is hope from you. He started to explain to them by analogy, by an argument de minore ad majus, and by equal cut. By analogy: The daily sacrifice is a public offering and Pesaḥ is a public offering. Since the daily sacrifice as a public offering pushes aside the Sabbath, also Pesaḥ as a public offering pushes aside the Sabbath. By an argument de minore ad majus. Since the daily sacrifice, whose action is not subject to extirpation, pushes aside the Sabbath, it is only logical that Pesaḥ, whose action is subject to extirpation, push aside the Sabbath. By equal cut. It is said about the daily sacrifice, at its fixed time⁹Num. 28:2., and it is said about Pesaḥ, at its fixed time¹⁰Num. 9:2.. They said to him, we already said, is there hope from a Babylonian? The analogy which you proposed can be answered. No, if you said this about daily sacrifices which are fixed in number, what can you infer for Pesaḥ which is not fixed in number? The argument de minore ad majus which you proposed can be answered. No, if you said this about daily sacrifices which are most holy, what can you infer for Pesaḥ which is a simple sacrifice¹¹The relationship between daily sacrifice and Pesaḥ is not that of minor and major; the argument is intrinsically invalid.? Concerning the equal cut which you proposed, nobody can introduce an equal cut by himself¹²Equal expressions in the Pentateuch imply equal legal status only if there is a documented tradition that these words were written for this purpose. Babli 66a..

MISHNAH: Rebbi Aqiba answered, sprinkling⁶⁸Purifying a person impure by the impurity of the dead by sprinkling with water containing of the ashes of the Red Cow. In Second Temple times this was a public act (Mishnah Parah 11:4) not performed on the Sabbath. is a counter example, for it is a commandment and because of Sabbath rest does not push aside the Sabbath⁶⁹If the 14th of Nisan is a Sabbath and a person’s seventh day of impurity falls on that day, he may not be purified by sprinkling, but this is not biblically forbidden, and he has to celebrate his Pesaḥ on the 14th of Iyar. Cf. Mishnaiot 3,4.. So you should not wonder about these⁵⁵The Mishnah is a continuation of Mishnah 1, where R. Eliezer holds that all actions needed for the Pesaḥ push aside the Sabbath. The discussion in particular is about the list of rabbinically prohibited actions at the end of Mishnah 1, which are permitted by R. Eliezer but prohibited by the Sages (represented by R. Joshua.), even though they are commandments and because of Sabbath rest but shall not push aside the Sabbath.
Rebbi Eliezer said to him, about this I am arguing. Since slaughter, which is work, pushes the Sabbath aside, sprinkling, which is because of Sabbath rest, shall push aside the Sabbath. Rebbi Aqiba said to him, or the other way. Since sprinkling, which is because of Sabbath rest, does not push aside the Sabbath, slaughter, which is work, shall not push the Sabbath aside⁸⁶Since it is agreed that the obligation to slaughter the Pesaḥ on the Sabbath if it is the 14th of Nisan is a biblical decree (Halakhah 6:1), what R. Aqiba proves is that biblical and rabbinic decrees cannot be compared in formal or informal arguments de minore ad majus..
Rebbi Eliezer said to him, Aqiba! You uprooted what is written in the Torah, between the evenings, at its fixed time⁸⁷Num. 9:2., whether on weekdays or on the Sabbath. He answered him, Rabbi, bring me a fixed time for these similar to the fixed time for slaughter⁸⁸There is no biblical authorization for preparations of the Pesaḥ to be executed in violation of Sabbath rules.. Rebbi Aqiba formulated a principle: Anything which can be done on Friday does not push the Sabbath aside. Slaughter which cannot be done on Friday pushes the Sabbath aside.

There⁷⁷Mishnah 9:2., we have stated: “What is ‘far away’⁷⁸That a person at this place on the 14th of Nisan is not obligated to bring his Pesaḥ on the 14th of Nisan (Num. 9:13).? From Modiin and farther away, and in the same distance in every direction, the words of Rebbi Aqiba. Rebbi Eliezer says, from the doorstep⁷⁹Accadic askuppu. of the Temple courtyard and farther away.” Rebbi Joḥanan said, Rebbi Eliezer said this only not to make him liable for extirpation⁸⁰But he will agree that anybody within commuting distance to the Temple is obligated by a positive commandment (Num.9:2) to offer the Pesaḥ.. Rebbi Eleazar said, the Mishnah implies this: “Rebbi Aqiba answered him, sprinkling is a counter example, for it is a commandment.” Is it a commandment to sprinkle⁸¹The purification from the impurity of the dead is an obligation for anybody coming to the Sanctuary. If he is not going there, there is no obligation to be sprinkled on.? Explain it that his seventh day happened to be the Fourteenth which fell on a Sabbath. If it had been a weekday, one would have sprinkled on him, then he would have come, slaughtered his Pesaḥ⁸²This is an inexact statement. The person who was sprinkled with the water containing the ashes of the Red Cow on the 3^rd and 7^th days of his impurity and then immerses himself in a miqweh is able to enter the sanctuary and eat sancta after sundown (Num. 19:19). This means that another person has to slaughter the Pesaḥ for him; but he can then come and eat from the sacrifice in the night. Rav Hoshaia holds that one may not slaughter for a person who could not slaughter by himself; therefore he has to transfer the situation to the 13th., and entered and eaten it in the evening. Because it is a Sabbath and one does not sprinkle on him, it results that he his prevented from fulfilling the commandment. Rav Hoshaia said, explain it that his seventh day happened to be the Thirteenth which fell on a Sabbath. If it had been a weekday, one would have sprinkled on him, then the next day he would have come, slaughtered his Pesaḥ, and entered and eaten it in the evening. Because it is a Sabbath and one does not sprinkle on him, it results that he is prevented from fulfilling the commandment. It was found stated⁸³A baraita (not quoted) supports R. Eleazar against Rav Hoshaia. following the first [explanation].