Rujukan Talmud untuk Imamat 16:24: Jerusalem Talmud Yoma

If one slaughtered outside⁴⁶Outside the Temple domain, which is a deadly sin for sacrifices. the two he-goats⁴⁷There really are three he-goats on that day, the two mentioned in Lev. 16 and the holiday purification offering mentioned in Num. 29:11. The latter is referred to as “he-goat made outside” since its blood is poured onto the altar in the courtyard, where its inner parts are burned. The he-goat chosen as sacrifice by drawing lots is referred to as “he-goat made for inside” since its blood is sprinkled inside the sanctuary (and its body burned outside the sacred domain.) Since there is no reason to treat the holiday purification offering differently from all other holiday offerings, the question asked here must refer to the he-goats subject to drawing lots of which only one is going to be a sacrifice. of the Day of Atonement, there are Tannaim who state, he is liable; there are Tannaim who state, he is not liable. Rav Ḥisda said, he who said that he is liable, if the he-goat who is chosen for inside was sacrificed; he who said that he is not liable, if the he-goat who is chosen for outside was not sacrificed⁴⁸It is clear that for “inside” one has to read “outside” since the question is asked about the he-goat whose blood is to be brought inside, and if it was slaughtered in the Temple it cannot be slaughtered a second time outside. If the he-goat for outside was slaughtered, the main ceremony is concluded Lev. 16:24; the remaining he-goats cannot be sacrifices and their slaughter outside the sacred domain is no offense.. Rebbi Yose said, Rav Ḥisda wants to compare it to Pesaḥ but it is not comparable. Rebbi Mana bar Tanḥum said, Rebbi Eleazar and Rebbi Joḥanan both are saying, a Pesaḥ whose time passed is changed automatically⁴⁹A Pesaḥ sacrifice after the 14th of Nisan is a well-being sacrifice. Babli 63a., but here it changes by slaughter⁵⁰The he-goat chosen by the lot cannot be changed into the he-goat for outside.. How is it? He who said liable wanted to say that drawing lots is obstructive; he who said not liable wanted to say that drawing lots is not obstructive⁵¹Since the opinion of Rav Ḥisda is refuted, that the Tannaim refer to two different situations and do not disagree, one has to find the root of the disagreement. The text as it stands seems unintelligible; there seems to be unanimity that here also the mentions of “obstructive” and “not obstructive” have to be switched. If drawing is obstructive, neither of the two he-goats is a sacrifice before the drawing, and slaughter outside cannot be sinful. But if it is not obstructive, each one of the he-goats is a potential dedicated sacrifice and outside slaughter is sinful.. There is only one here for Hashem⁵²Since only one of the he-goats can become a sacrifice, the argument last given is invalid (unless both he-goats are simultaneously slaughtered outside.). Rebbi Samuel the brother of Rebbi Berekhiah said, either one of them, after he drew lots is liable for the Eternal’s and is not liable for Azazel’s⁵³Since the latter he-goat is not a sacrifice.. Rebbi Abba said, only if he gave the bull’s gift⁵⁴As described in Mishnah 3, the blood of the bull has to be brought inside. This is called “the gift of the bull’s blood.”. But if he did not give the bull’s gift he is not liable since the slaughter of the he-goat obstructs giving the bull’s blood⁵⁵The he-goat chosen to be the Eternal’s is slaughtered after the bull, but the bull cannot be slaughtered before the he-goat is chosen and ready to be slaughtered..

MISHNAH: If he read in his byssus garments, he sanctified hands and legs,³⁶But if he read in his own stole he already had to wash hands and feet when he took off his white garments (Chapter 3, Note 98). Dressing and undressing profane garments does not necessitate washing hands and feet. and undressed, stepped down, and immersed himself, came up, and dried himself with a towel. They brought him the golden garments³⁷The High Priest’s garments for service all year long. These are worn for all parts of all year long. These are worn for all parts of the service of the Day of Atonement which do not involve entering the Holiest of Holies., he dressed and sanctified hands and legs.
He went out and sacrificed his ram, and the people’s ram³⁸As prescribed by Lev. 16:24. The biblical expression “did” is read to imply that the entire work involved, slaughter, dismembering, cleaning, transporting to the altar, and burning the elevation sacrifices, had to be performed by the unaided High Priest., and the seven unblemished sheep³⁹As prescribed by Num. 29:8., the words of Rebbi Eliezer. Rebbi Aqiba says, they⁴⁰The animals enumerated by R. Eliezer were brought before the High Priest wore the white garments for the first time. had been brought with the daily morning offering; the bull of elevation offering and the he-goat offered outside were brought with the daily afternoon sacrifice⁴¹This statement is the common opinion of R. Eliezer and R. Aqiba. These sacrifices are musaf sacrifices prescribed in Num. 29:8. He sanctified hands and legs and undressed, stepped down, and immersed himself, came up and dried himself with a towel. They brought him the white garments⁴². To re-enter the Holiest of Holies., he dressed and sanctified hands and legs.
He entered to remove the cup and the pan⁴³Which were left in the Holiest of Holies. Chapter 3, Mishnah 1.. He sanctified hands and legs and undressed, stepped down, and immersed himself, came up and dried himself with a towel. They brought him the golden garments, he dressed and sanctified hands and legs.
He entered, burned the incense, and prepared the lights. He sanctified hands and legs, and undressed, stepped down, and immersed himself, came up and dried himself with a towel. They brought him his own garments in which he dressed. One accompanies him to his house. He made a festivity for his friends when he exited in peace⁴⁴He exited the Holiest of Holies, which is most dangerous; cf. Chapter 1, Notes 220–222..

The bull, the ram, and the seven unblemished sheep were brought with the daily morning offering; the remainder were brought with the daily afternoon offering⁴⁷This is the rule of R. Aqiba.. Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, the reason of this Tanna is to join purification sacrifice to purification sacrifice and elevation sacrifice to elevation sacrifice⁴⁸Even though the he-goat as purification sacrifice is prescribed for all holidays and therefore is most frequent, as noted later in Num. 29:11 it is required that this sacrifice follow that of the he-goat whose blood was brought into the Temple, and be followed by the elevation sacrifice which is the evening daily offering. Therefore it makes sense to require the elevation offerings required by Lev. 16:3,24 to be brought after the atonement service and before the daily evening service.. But some want to say, the bull, the ram, the people’s ram, and the seven unblemished sheep were brought with the daily morning offering; the remainder were brought with the daily afternoon offering. This Tanna distributes the services. What is the reason? He leaves and brings hiselevation sacrifice and the people’s elevation sacrifice⁴⁹Lev. 16:24.. As mentioned in the matter. What is mentioned in the matter? His ram and the people’s ram⁵⁰16:3,5.. Rebbi Abun bar Ḥiyya said, what is the reason for the he-goat? Of the blood of the atoning purification sacrifice⁵¹This is misquoting Ex. 30:10 when it should be Num. 29:11 : A he-goat as purification offering in addition to the atoning purification offering. Babli 70b.. The atoning purification sacrifice already preceded.