Rujukan Talmud untuk Maleakhi 2:11: Jerusalem Talmud Sotah & Megillah

בָּגְדָ֣ה יְהוּדָ֔ה וְתוֹעֵבָ֛ה נֶעֶשְׂתָ֥ה בְיִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל וּבִירֽוּשָׁלִָ֑ם כִּ֣י ׀ חִלֵּ֣ל יְהוּדָ֗ה קֹ֤דֶשׁ יְהוָה֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר אָהֵ֔ב וּבָעַ֖ל בַּת־אֵ֥ל נֵכָֽר׃

Yehuda telah berkhianat, dan kekejian telah dilakukan di Israel dan di Yerusalem; sebab Yehuda telah mencemarkan kekudusan Yang Mahakekal, yang dikasihi-Nya, dan telah memperistri anak perempuan allah asing.

Jerusalem Talmud Sotah

281Num. rabba 9(24). It is written: “They came to the vineyards in direction of Timna.282Jud. 14:5.” Rav283The title has to be “Rebbi”. Samuel ben Rav Isaac said, this teaches you that his father and mother were showing him the vineyards in direction of Timna sown in several kinds and saying to him: My son, just as their vineyards are sown with several kinds so their daughters are sown with several kinds284They are children of adultery. Jud. 14:4.. “And his father and mother did not know that this was from the Eternal, that he was looking for a pretext from the Philistines.” Rebbi Eleazar said, In seven places it is written: “Do not contract marriage with them.285That verse is only in Deut. 7:3. But the prohibition of Canaanite women is also in Ex. 34:16. Outside the Pentateuch, the prohibition is mentioned Mal. 2:11, Ezra 9:2,12,14; Neh. 10:31.” Rebbi Abun said, to prohibit seven peoples286The seven Canaanite tribes enumerated in Gen. 15:20–21. Philistines are not mentioned in that list.. And here, it says so287It is not obvious what the remark means. According to R. David Fraenckel, since Simson’s relations with Philistine women were not forbidden, why was he punished? According to R. Moses Margalit, since all non-Jewish women are forbidden in the interpretation of pentateuchal law in Mal., Ezra, Neh., how can it be said that his first marriage was (Jud. 14:4) “from the Eternal”?? Rebbi Isaac said, “if he scoffs about the scoffers.288Prov. 3:34. According to R. David Fraenckel, since at least Simson’s relations with the Gazean prostitute and Dalilah were illegitimate, he deserved punishment.”
Tanya RabiBookmarkShareCopy

Megillah

It has been taught: R. Joshua b. Korha said: Malachi is Ezra, and the Sages say that Malachi was his proper name. R. Nahman said:Nahman said: It is reasonable to accept the view that Malachi was the same as Ezra. For it is written in the prophecy of Malachi, “Judah has dealt treacherously and an abomination is committed in Israel and in Jerusalem, for Judah has profaned the holiness of the Lord which he loves and has married the daughter of a strange God” (Malachi 2:11).
Tanya RabiBookmarkShareCopy