וְהַגּוֹרָל֨וֹת הִפַּ֜לְנוּ עַל־קֻרְבַּ֣ן הָעֵצִ֗ים הַכֹּהֲנִ֣ים הַלְוִיִּם֮ וְהָעָם֒ לְ֠הָבִיא לְבֵ֨ית אֱלֹהֵ֧ינוּ לְבֵית־אֲבֹתֵ֛ינוּ לְעִתִּ֥ים מְזֻמָּנִ֖ים שָׁנָ֣ה בְשָׁנָ֑ה לְבַעֵ֗ר עַל־מִזְבַּח֙ יְהוָ֣ה אֱלֹהֵ֔ינוּ כַּכָּת֖וּב בַּתּוֹרָֽה׃
Kami juga membuang undi, yaitu para imam, orang-orang Lewi, dan rakyat, mengenai persembahan kayu, untuk membawanya ke Bait Allah kami menurut kaum keluarga kami, pada waktu-waktu yang telah ditetapkan, setiap tahun, untuk dibakar di atas mezbah Yang Mahakekal, Allah kami, seperti yang tertulis dalam Taurat;
Jerusalem Talmud Bikkurim
HALAKHAH: So far if he robbed the real estate. If he robbed a vine and planted it, does he not owe money22If the owners gave up hope to recover the robbed object, the robber becomes the legal owner. The transfer of ownership imposes on the robber the obligation to pay for it. Before giving up hope, the owners could have sued for the return of the stolen object; after they gave up hope but the circumstances changed and made a suit possible, they can only sue for damages. The next paragraph will make clear that this is the situation here.? But the rabbis have a problem: do commandments follow the rules of Temple sacrifices23These rules are stricter than those governing other obligations. or not? If you say they are like Temple sacrifices he may not bring24Sifra Wayiqra Paršata 5(2), Babli Baba Qama 67b: Lev. 1:10, “If his sacrifice is from the flock” implies that robbed animals cannot become sacrifices.; if you say they are not like Temple sacrifices he may bring. Everybody agrees that from a worshipped tree which was damaged25If one of the prior worshippers of the tree damages it in a manner inadmissible in pagan worship, the tree loses is idolatrous status and becomes profanely usable. But if at any time it was forbidden for the Jewish altar it remains forbidden since in Neh. 10:35 the supply of firewood for the altar is called a “sacrifice.” one cannot bring logs for the altar fire. Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish asked, may he take a lulav26The palm frond used on the Holiday of Tabernacles. In the Babli, Avodah Zarah 47a, this is R. Simeon ben Laqish’s question in the interpretation of Rav Dimi. In his interpretation, the rules of sacrifices require that anything inadmissible at some time is always inadmissible; clearly this is not the case for any non-sacrificial use. from it? Do commandments follow the rules of Temple sacrifices or not? If you say they are like Temple sacrifices he may not take; if you say they are not like Temple sacrifices he may take. It is obvious that he may take a lulav from it27The Babli (Mo‘ed Qaṭan 26b) makes a difference between things used for commandments (such as a lulav) and holy things (such as a Torah scroll). Things used for commandments may be discarded after use; holy things which can no longer be used must be buried just as damaged Temple stones must be buried. It is possible that the Yerushalmi agrees with this distinction. and commandments are not like Temple sacrifices. May he bring First Fruits? According to Rebbi Jehudah28The disagreement between R. Jehudah and the Sages is in Mishnah 3:10. who compares them to country sacred food29Sacred food to be consumed by the Cohen in purity anywhere in the Land, i. e., heave, heave of the tithe, and ḥallah. he may bring; according to the rabbis who compare them to Temple sacrifices he may not bring.
Jerusalem Talmud Shekalim
153A copy of this text, except for the last sentence, is in Shevi`it9:7, Notes 95–97. Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun said, Rebbi Abba bar Mamal asked: If he said, I am obligated [to offer] a log, does he bring one log? Rebbi Eleazar said, a Mishnah says that each one is a separate sacrifice, as we have stated154Mishnah Yoma 2:5., “two, holding in their hands two wooden logs.” This adds single logs.